SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(MP) 550

SUJOY PAUL, ANIL VERMA
Jagdish Chouhan (Baret) – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
L.C. Patne for appellant; Ms. Vinita Phaye, Government Advocate for respondents/State.

ORDER

Paul J. -- 1. This intra Court appeal filed under section 2 (1) of the Madhya Pradesh Uchcha Nyayalaya (Khand Nyayapeeth Ko Appeal) Adhiniyam, 2005 takes exception to the order of learned Single Judge dated 11.2.2020 passed in WP No.12730/2019 whereby the challenge to the disciplinary proceedings, punishment order and appellate order was turned down.

2. Draped in brevity, the relevant facts necessary for adjudication of this matter are that the appellant, an Assistant Sub-Inspector was served with a show cause notice dated 28.4.2015 (Annexure P/2). In turn, he filed his reply denied the charges and gave his factual explanation on 4.5.2015 (Annexure P/3). Thereafter, indisputably without conducting any departmental inquiry, the disciplinary authority/Superintendent of Police (SP), Neemuch imposed a punishment of stoppage of one annual increment without cumulative effect which will have no adverse impact on future increments/pension. Aggrieved, appellant preferred an appeal which was rejected by order dated 1.4.2016. Assailing the disciplinary proceedings, punishment and appellate orders, the appellant filed aforesaid writ petition. Contending inter alia i) the show cause notice

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top