Keshar Bai vs Lakhanlal - 2022 Supreme(MP) 183

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2022 Supreme(MP) 183

PRANAY VERMA
Keshar Bai – Appellant
Versus
Lakhanlal – Respondent

Advocates:
Harish Joshi for appellants.

JUDGMENT

1. The learned counsel for the appellants is heard on the question of admission.

This appeal under section 100 of the CPC has been preferred by the appellants/plaintiffs against the judgment and decree dated 20.12.2019 passed in Regular Civil Appeal 20-A/2017 and 21-A/2017 by the IInd Additional District Judge, Shujalpur, District Shujalpur arising out of the judgment and decree dated 10.8.2017 passed in Civil Suit No.136- A/2017 by the Ist Civil Judge, Class-II, District Shujalpur whereby their claim for specific performance of contract dated 18.4.1989 and for permanent injunction has been dismissed and the counter claim of defendant No.1/appellants has been decreed.

2. As per plaintiffs, Lakhanlal Nai, defendant No.1, was the owner of the suit land bearing survey No.454/3 area 0.418 hectare Gram Pipliya Nagar, Tehsil Kalapipal, District Shajapur. On 18.04.1989 he entered into an agreement with Chhotelal, husband of plaintiff No.1 and father of plaintiffs 2 to 7 for sale of the suit land in his favour at the rate of 2000/- per bigha. An agreement was also executed between them in that regard on 18.4.1989 upon payment of an amount of Rs.4000/- by Chhotelal to defendant No.1 f

Click Here to Read the rest of this document