Back
MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
BHOPAL CO-OPERATIVE CENTRAL BANK MARYADIT, BHOPAL – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF M. P. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. reference to conflicting judgments. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments by petitioners about removal. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 3. analysis of conflicting judgments. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. no conflict between earlier judgments. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 5. different application scenarios for statutes. (Para 16 , 17) |
| 6. implication of natural justice principles. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 7. natural justice in administrative decisions. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 8. assessment of disqualification provisions. (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, C. J. : – All these matters have been laid before the Full Bench upon a reference from a learned Single Bench of this Court vide order dated 25-4-2019, assuming conflict between the ratio of two judgments rendered by Division Benches of this Court, one in Writ Petition No. 6913/2017- Brij Kumar Chanpuriya vs. State of M. P. and others decided on 15-5-2017 and another in Writ Appeal No. 551/2019, Anter Singh and others vs. State of M. P. and others decided on 17-5-2019, for answering the following three questions of law : –
“1. Whether the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in W. P. No. 6913/2017 on 15-
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
