MOHAMMAD RAFIQ, RAJEEV KUMAR DUBEY, VIJAY KUMAR SHUKLA
Bhopal Cooperative Central Bank Maryadit, Bhopal – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Rafiq, C.J:- 1. All these matters have been laid before the Full Bench upon a reference from a learned Single Bench of this Court vide order dated 25.4.2019, assuming conflict between the ratio of two judgments rendered by Division Benches of this Court, one in Writ Petition No.6913/2917-Brij Kumar Chanpuriya v. State of M.P. & others decided on 15.5.2017 and another in Writ Appeal No.551/2019-Anter Singh & others v. State of M.P. & others decided on 17.5.2019, for answering the following three questions of law:-
“1. Whether the order passed by the Division Bench of this Court in WP No.6913/2017 on 15.5.2017 lays down the correct law in regard to section 48-AA and section 50-A of the Act of 1960 or the order passed in Writ Appeal No.551/2019 affirming the order passed by the Single Bench of this Court in WP No.5033/2019?
2. Whether the provisions of section 48-AA and section 50-A of the Act of 1960 operates in a different sphere i.e. pre and post election of the Director?
3. Whether section 50-A of the Act of 1960 is a deeming provision for holding a Director of a society as disqualified or an opportunity of hearing is still required to be given as held by this Cour
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.