IN THE HIGH COURT OF GUJARAT AT AHMEDABAD
Bhargav D. Karia, J.
Bharat Sudambhai Patel – Petitioner
Versus
State Of Gujarat – Respondent
R/Special Civil Application No. 6143 of 2022
Decided On : 14-10-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's observations leading to the quashing of the impugned order. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT :
Heard learned Senior Advocate Mr.Prakash Jani assisted by learned advocate Mr.Archit P. Jani for the petitioner, learned Advocate General Mr.Kamal Trivedi assisted by learned Assistant Government Pleader Mr.Vinay Vishen for the respondent Nos.1,2 and 3 and learned advocate Mr.Dipen Desai for the respondent No.4.
1. By order dated 22nd April, 2022, this petition was fixed for final disposal with the consent of the learned advocates for the respective parties and thereafter, the petition was finally heard on 2nd May, 2022. Therefore, issue Rule, returnable forthwith. Learned advocates for the respondents waive service of notice of rule.
2. By this petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner has challenged the order dated 15th March, 2022 passed by the respondent No.2-Registrar, Co-operative Societies, State of Gujarat under Section 76 (B) (1) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 (for short ‘the Act’) read with Rule 32 of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Rule, 1965 (for short ‘the Rules’) whereby the petitioner is ordered to be removed from the post of Director of the Surat District Co-operative Mill Producers’ Union Limited (SUMUL Dairy) (for short ‘the Union’).
3. The brief facts of the case are as under :
3.1. The petitioner was an elected member of the Managing Committee of the Union from 2012 to 2015 and thereafter from 2015 to 2020. The petitioner was again elected in the year 2020 for the term 2020 to 2025.
3.2. The father of the petitioner was the founding member of the Union and the petitioner has also worked in the co-operative sector for many years. The petitioner is Vice-President of Surat District Sahakari Sangh which runs NESU Seva Sanchalit Ashram Shala and President of Primary Milk Producing Co-operative Society. Petitioner was also elected as Director earlier in APMC, Nizar.
3.3. It is the case of the petitioner that the son of the petitioner namely, Mr.Hemant Patel who is an Engineer by profession having degree of Bachelor of Engineering was initially appointed on 29.07.2010 at Mother Dairy which is unit of Gujarat Co-operative Milk Marketing Federation.
3.4. Son of the petitioner - Mr.Hemant Patel was appointed as a Trainee on 16.08.2010 and was confirmed as Engineer with effect from 16.08.2012 in Process and Automation Department. He was thereafter promoted as Senior Technical Officer with effect from 01.01.2016. Son of the petitioner left the job from Federation on 05.07.2016. Thereafter the Union issued a service contract dated 07.07.2016 to Mr.Hemant Patel for the period from 16.07.2016 to 15.10.2016. The Union also issued an advertisement on 22.03.2016 for the post of B.E. (Instrumentation) having five years of experience for 100 Metric Ton per day milk powder plant capacity and 10 Lakh liter processing dairy products.
3.5. The Union thereafter issued an appointment letter dated 18.10.2016 to Mr.Hemant Patel selecting him for service in the Union after personal interview with effect from 21.10.2016. By letter dated 01.11.2017, the services of Mr.Hemant Patel was confirmed by the Union. Thereafter by letter dated 30th August, 2018 of the Union, Mr.Hemant Patel was transferred from Engineering Department to Purchase Section (Material Management) with effect from 1st September, 2018.
3.6. According to the petitioner, term of the Managing Committee of the Union came to an end in the year 2020 and election programme was published as per the provisions of the Act and Rules. The respondent No.4-Mr.Yogesh Chunilal Rajput filed the nomination in his capacity as representative of Devada Dudh Utpadak Sahakari Mandali Limited. The petitioner filed an objection against the nomination filed by the respondent No.4 on the ground that the said Society did not provide 80 Lakh Liters of Milk to the Union and th
Malvikaben Bhikhabhai Patel Versus State of Gujarat
Amar Chandra Chakraborty Versus The Collector of Excise, Government of Tripura and Others
Association of Unified Tele Services Providers Versus Union of India
B. Lakshmikantha Rao vs. P Chinna Mallaiah
Bhadresh Ramanial Pate vs. State of Gujarat
Bhadreshkumar Ramanlal Patel and Others Versus Stat of Gujarat and Others
Bhikhubhai V. Patel versus State of Gujarat
Chandigarh Administration and another v. Jagjit Singh and another
Dr.Indramani Pyarelal Gupta Versus W.R.Nathu
E.P.Royappa Versus State of T.N.
Election Commissioner, India Versus Saka Venkata Rao
Faridabad CT Scan Centre v. D.G. Health Services and others
Gursharan Singh v. New Delhi Municipal Committee
Hundraj Kanyalal Sajnani v. Union of India
Kartar Singh Bhadana vs. Hari Singh Nalwa
Keshaorao Narayanrao Patil v. District Deputy Registrar
Maharashtra State Board of Secondary and Higher Secondary Educationv. Paritosh Bhupesh Kumar Sheth
Maharashtra Versus Dr.Budhikota Subbarao
Narayan Govind Gavate Versus The State of Maharashtra
Pioneer Urban Land and Infrasturcture Limited Versus Union of India
Pundalik Versus District Deputy Registrar, Cooperative Societies
Ram Padarath Mahto v. Mishri Sinha
Ranjeet Singh vs. Harmohinder Singh Pradhan
Secretary, Jaipur Development Authority, Jaipur v. Daulat Mal Jain and others
Shrikant Versus Vasantrao and Others
State of Bihar and others v. Kameshwar Prasad Singh and another
State of Bihar Versus Upendra Narayansingh
State of Haryana v. Ram Kumar Mann
State of Maharashtra vs Babulal Kriparam Takkamore and others
Style (Dress Land) v. Union Territory, Chandigarh and another
Union of India, Railway Board and others v. J.V. Subhaiah and others
Union of India and another v. International Trading Co. and another
Union of India Versus International Trading Company
Union of India versus Praveen Gupta
The main legal point established in the judgment is that an order under Section 76B(2) of the Gujarat Co-operative Societies Act, 1961 cannot be passed without first issuing a notice for breach of Se....
If in opinion of Registrar, any officer makes persistent default or is negligent in performance of duties imposed on him by this Act or rules or byelaws or does anything which is prejudicial to inter....
In some very rare and exceptional cases, the High Court may quash a show-cause notice if it is found to be wholly without jurisdiction or for some other reason, if it is wholly illegal. However, ordi....
The court established that disqualification under Section 76(B) requires clear evidence of misconduct, and the inquiry process must be thorough and fair.
Provisions of Section 76(B(2) would stand somewhat on different footing. This Court when is taking a view that action could be initiated under subsection (2) only after passing order of removal, issu....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement to adhere to principles of natural justice, including providing detailed reasons for decisions and ensuring proper notice and consu....
Disqualification under the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act requires clear evidence of holding dual designated officer positions, failing which challenges under subsequent provisions may lead to....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the Registrar, acting on behalf of the State Government, has the power to issue advertisement for filling up posts in Cooperative Banks, and t....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.