SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(MP) 656

PRANAY VERMA
UMESH S/o HARGOVIND KHANDELWAL – Appellant
Versus
JAGDISH S/o TEJA DEVDA – Respondent


ORDER : – Heard finally with the consent of parties.

    This petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India has been preferred by plaintiff/petitioner against order dated 23-3-2021 passed in Civil Suit No. 18-A/2018 by the Ist Civil Judge, Class-I, Manawar, District Dhar, whereby his application under Order 6, Rule 17 of the CPC seeking leave of the Court to amend his plaint has been rejected.

2. The plaintiff has instituted an action on 25-4-2018 for specific performance of contract dated 23-1-2015. The written statement to plaintiff’s claim has been filed by defendant No. 1 on 3-8-2018. On 13-3-2020 the plaintiff filed an application under Order 6, Rule 17 of the CPC for amendment of the plaint to plead that cause of action has always been accruing to him. He further prayed for amendment of relief clause of the plaint to add the relief that in case specific performance cannot be granted in his favour then compensation in lieu thereof be granted. He also sought to add the heading in the list of documents filed by him. The application was contested by defendant No. 1 by filing his reply. By the impugned order plaintiff’s amendment application has been rejected by the trial Co

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top