RAVI MALIMATH, PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
BHARAT LAL S/o SUNDERLAL DUBEY – Appellant
Versus
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, DAMOH – Respondent
ORDER PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J. : – This intra Court appeal takes an exception to order dated 5-5-2006, passed by the learned Single Judge in Writ Petition No. 126 of 2000, whereby, petition preferred by the appellant has been dismissed upholding an order of compulsory retirement passed against the appellant.
2. The facts of the case are that the appellant was appointed as Process Writer on 5-7-1994 and thereafter, vide order dated 11-9-1972 he was promoted on the post of L.D.C. Since then the appellant was working under the Establishment of District and Sessions Judge, Damoh. The appellant was also holding the position of Divisional President of Madhya Pradesh Judicial Employee Association, Sagar Branch, District Damoh. Vide order dated 11-11-1997 (Annexure-A/9), the appellant has been compulsorily retired in public interest in exercise of power vested under Rule 42(1)(b) of the Madhya Pradesh Civil Services (Pension) Rules, 1976 (hereinafter referred to “Rule of 1976”). The appellant preferred appeal against the said order which has also been dismissed, vide order dated 11-5-199
State of U. P. vs. Madan Mohan Nagar
Union of India vs. J. N. Sinha and another
Shambhudayal Sharma vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and others
Ram Ekbal Sharma vs. State of Bihar and another
Union of India and others vs. Dulal Dutt
Punjab State Power Corporation Limited vs. Hari Kishan Verma
Ram Murti Yadav vs. State of U. P. and another
Chandra Prakash Sahi vs. State of U. P. and others
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.