SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 412

RAVI MALIMATH, VISHAL MISHRA
Kanchan Shukla – Appellant
Versus
State of M. P. – Respondent


Advocates:
Aniruddh K. Mishra for petitioner;
B. D. Singh, Deputy Advocate General for respondents/State.

ORDER

1. The present petition has been filed by the wife of detenu namely Pravesh Shukla S/o Ramakant Shukla aged about 30 years, challenging the order of preventive detention dated 5.7.2023 passed by respondent No.2-District Magistrate Sidhi (M.P.) under sub-section (2) of section 3 of the National Security Act, 1980.

2. When the matter was listed on 22.9.2023, the learned Deputy Advocate General sought time to counter the rejoinder filed by the petitioner. When the Court was inclined to grant time, the same was strongly objected to by the learned counsel for the petitioner. He submitted that the petition must be heard today itself. In spite of intimating to him that the reply to the rejoinder may be necessary for the determination of the case, he insisted time and again that irrespective of the same, the matter has to be heard today. It is for this reason that we have proceeded to hear the matter finally.

3. It is the case of the petitioner that on 5.7.2023, a video got viral on social media with respect to an incident of urination that took place in Sidhi district in which th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top