Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH BENCH AT INDORE
Rajendra Kumar Verma, J.
Mohammad Shahid – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent
Miscellaneous Criminal Case No. 58050 of 2022
Decided On : 07-12-2022
Modification/Correction - Typographical Error - The court allowed the modification/correction in the order to rectify a typographical error in the vehicle number mentioned in the original order.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner filed an application seeking modification/correction in the order passed by the Court due to a typographical error in the vehicle number.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the mistake in the order appeared to be a typographical error and directed the correction to rectify the error.
Issues: Typographical error in the order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court has the authority to modify/correct orders to rectify typographical errors.
Final Decision: The court directed the correction in the order to rectify the typographical error.
JUDGMENT
Rajendra Kumar (Verma), J. - This application has been filed by the petitioner under section 482 of the Cr.P.C.,1973 seeking modification/correction in the order passed by the Court vide order dated 11.11.2022, passed in CRR No.3240/2022.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the order dated 11.11.2022, passed in CRR No.3240/2022. due to oversight/typographical error, the Vehicle number has been wrongly mentioned as RJ09GB7557 instead of RJ09GC1757. Hence prayer has been made for correction in the aforesaid order dated 11.11.2022.
3. On perusal of the order dated 11.11.2022 and the record, this Court finds that the said mistake appears to be a typographical error which is required to be modified/corrected.
4. In view of the same, it is directed that in the order dated 11.11.2022, passed in CRR No.3240/2022., the Vehicle No. "RJ09GB7557" be read as "RJ09GC1757".
5. This order be read conjointly with order dated 11.11.2022, passed in CRR No.3240/2022.
6. With the aforesaid the petition stands disposed of.
AI
Courts have the authority to modify/correct orders to rectify typographical errors.
Courts may allow correction/modification in orders to rectify inadvertent clerical errors.
The court has the authority to correct typographical errors in orders to rectify mistakes.
Errors in judgments, including typographical mistakes in policy numbers, qualify for correction under Section 152 of the CPC to ensure the enforcement of just compensation.
Clerical errors in court orders must be corrected to maintain the accuracy and integrity of judicial records.
The court has the discretion to allow modification to correct typographical errors in orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
