Back
MADAN GOPAL VYAS
Gurdeep Singh – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. clerical error in judgment header identified. (Para 1 , 3) |
| 2. procedures acknowledged for correcting clerical errors. (Para 2) |
| 3. find and replace command led to erroneous header. (Para 4) |
| 4. order to correct judgment header and notify publishers. (Para 5 , 6) |
ORDER :
Madan Gopal Vyas, J.
On 27.9.2023, it was brought to my notice that in the order dated 04.08.2023 passed by me in SB Cr. Misc. Petition No.767/2022 ( Gurdeep Singh v. State of Rajasthan ), after the words "High Court Of Judicature For Rajasthan At" appearing in the header of judgment, "Bikaner" has been mentioned instead of "JODHPUR" by the Junior Personal Assistant concerned.
2. Today, the matter has been ordered to be listed in the category of "To Be Mentioned".
3. After summoning the original record of aforesaid case and perusing the order dated 4.8.2023, I directed my Private Secretary to seek explanation from the concerned Junior Personal Assistant. Upon serving the notice seeking explanation, the Junior Personal Assistant gave the explanation that by the order dated 4.8.2023, the Hon'ble Court allowed the criminal misc. petition and while quashing and setting aside the order passed by the learned Sp
Clerical errors in court orders must be corrected to maintain the accuracy and integrity of judicial records.
The court has the authority to correct typographical errors in orders to rectify mistakes.
The court established that clerical errors in judicial orders can be corrected to uphold the accuracy and integrity of legal documents.
The court has the discretion to allow modification to correct typographical errors in orders.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
