IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN
Farjand Ali, J.
Dilip Kumar – Appellant
Versus
State of Rajasthan – Respondent
S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Application No. 463 of 2022 in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No. 727 of 2022
Decided On : 22-12-2022
Mistake - Correction in Order - The court allowed the application for correction/modification in the order to rectify a clerical error in the vehicle number mentioned in the petition filed by the petitioner.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought correction/modification in the order due to a mistake in the vehicle number mentioned in the petition.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the error was due to inadvertence and a clerical error, thus allowing the application for modification/correction.
Issues: Correction of clerical error in the order.
Ratio Decidendi: The court took a lenient view considering the inadvertent mistake and allowed the correction/modification in the order.
Final Decision: The application for modification/correction in the order was allowed, and it was ordered to rectify the mistake in the vehicle number mentioned in the petition.
JUDGMENT
Farjand Ali, J. - The matter comes upon an application for correction/modification in the order dated 13.12.2022 passed in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.727/2022.
2. It is submitted that a mistake has been committed in the petition filed by the petitioner wherein instead of actual vehicle No.RJ-09-GA-3683 the same has wrongly been mentioned as RJ-19-GA-3683, therefore, the order dated 13.12.2022 has been passed in this regard. It is further submitted the said mistake occurred due to inadvertence and is a clerical error, therefore, the rectification is sought.
Heard.
3. Considering the submissions, the error seems to be committed due to inadvertence thus, a lenient view is taken. The application for modification/correction in the order dated 13.12.022 passed in S.B. Criminal Revision Petition No.727/2022 is allowed and it is ordered that in the said order Vehicle No. RJ-09-GA-3683 be read instead of RJ-19-GA-3683.
This order shall also be treated as part and parcel of order dated 13.12.2022.
AI
Courts may allow correction/modification in orders to rectify inadvertent clerical errors.
Courts have the authority to modify/correct orders to rectify typographical errors.
The court has the discretion to allow modification to correct typographical errors in orders.
The court established that typographical errors in legal documents can be corrected to ensure the accuracy of court records.
Clerical errors in court orders must be corrected to maintain the accuracy and integrity of judicial records.
The court emphasized the necessity for accuracy in judicial orders to prevent irreparable loss due to clerical errors.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.