SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 591

PRANAY VERMA
Manoj – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Somesh Gobhuj, Advocate, Ranjeet Sen, Advocate

JUDGMENT

Pranay Verma, J. - Heard on the question of admission and interim relief.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that before the Sub Divisional Officer an application under Section 129 (5) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 (Annexure P/8) had been filed on 08.07.2022 raising in detail the objections to the demarcation proceeding. However without even adverting to the said application the impugned final order has been passed by the Sub Divisional Officer.

3. Considering the aforesaid, issue notice to the respondent No.4 only on payment of process fee by RAD within a period of 7 working days.

4. Notices be made returnable within six weeks.

5. Till next date of hearing the operation of the impugned order dated 08.12.2022 (Annexure P/10) and 14.06.2022 (Annexure P/7) shall remain stayed.

C.c. as per rules.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top