Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J.
Jatan Singh - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of N.C.T. of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 4676 of 2021
Decided On : 08-07-2021
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner seeks demarcation direction. (Para 2) |
| 2. petitioner has repeatedly applied for demarcation. (Para 3) |
| 3. court directed timely consideration of demarcation application. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. petition disposed of with order instructions. (Para 8 , 9) |
JUDGMENT
Sanjeev Sachdeva, J. (Oral)--The hearing was conducted through video conferencing.
2. Petitioner seeks a direction to the respondents to conduct the demarcation as per the representations given by the petitioner.
3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been making repeated applications seeking demarcation of the subject land and has also deposited the requisite fee. He submits that if any further fee is payable, petitioner shall also pay the same.
4. Issue notice. Notice is accepted by learned counsel appearing for the respondents.
5. Since petitioner has been making several applications as is evident from Annexure P-2 to P-5, this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents to consider the application of the petitioner seeking demarcation of his land in accordance with law.
6. Respondents shall dispose of the application of the petitioner expeditiously preferably within a period of four weeks from today.
7. In case the request for demarcation is refused, petitioner shall be duly communicated the order of refusal and in case the application is allowed then respondents shall carry out the demarcation exercise expeditiously. In case there is any further requirement for the petitioner to pay any charges/fee, the same shall be paid by the petitioner on being intimated by the respondents.
8. Petition is disposed of in the above terms.
9. Copy of the Order be uploaded on the High Court website and be also forwarded to learned counsels through email.
The court established the necessity for timely handling of land demarcation requests and the requirement for proper communication regarding decisions related to those requests.
The court emphasized the importance of considering the petitioner's application for demarcation in accordance with the law and disposing of it expeditiously, with clear procedures for communication a....
The court has the authority to direct demarcation of land and determine the method and costs of demarcation.
Failure to consider objections raised under Section 129 (5) of the M.P. Land Revenue Code, 1959 before passing the impugned final order.
The court affirms the necessity for a petitioner to submit a fresh application before the government officials can proceed with property boundary surveys.
Court directs survey and demarcation of property after notice to objectors and within time frame.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
