IN THE HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH AT JABALPUR
AMAR NATH (KESHARWANI)
Yogesh Kumar Tamrakar S/O Shankar Prasad Tamrakar – Appellant
Versus
State Of M.P. Through Collector – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Amar Nath (Kesharwani), J.
This Second Appeal has been preferred by the appellant/plaintiff under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure of 1908 being aggrieved by the judgment and decree dated 16/02/2009 passed by Ist Additional District Judge, Satna, District Satna (M.P.) in Civil Appeal No.59-A/2003, whereby learned Additional District Judge dismissed the appeal and affirmed the judgment and decree dated 18/02/2003 passed by IVth Civil Judge, Class-II, Satna, District Satna (M.P.) in Civil Suit No.228-A/1999, whereby the suit filed by appellant/plaintiff for declaration of title and permanent injunction was dismissed.
2. Brief facts of the case are that the appellant/plaintiff has filed a suit for declaration of title, possession holder and to declare that the order dated 15/07/1994 passed by Collector, Satna in Revenue Case No.5A- 19/93-94 and order dated 18/07/1994 passed by Tehsildar Raghurajnagar in Revenue Case No.246A/6A/93-94 are illegal and void against the interest of the appellant/plaintiff and permanent injunction against respondent that neither he do any kind of interference in possession of the appellant/plaintiff himself, nor do it through any of his
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.