SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2021 Supreme(Tri) 144

S. TALAPATRA
Neermahal Gas Agency – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent


Advocates appeared:
Mr. Somik Deb, Sr. Advocate, for the Petitioner; Mr. D. Bhattacharya, G.A., Mr. S. Saha, Advocate, for the Respondent

JUDGMENT

The petitioner is a sole proprietorship firm. The petitioner was holding a license for dealing in cooking gas under Tripura Cooking Gas [Licensing, Control and Maintenances of Supplies] Order 1985. According to the petitioner, on 04.06.2020, the petitioner was served a showcause [Annexure-3 to the writ petition] whereby the petitioner was asked to showcause as to why lawful action shall not be taken against her [the sole proprietor] for violation of provisions of the Tripura Cooking Gas [Licensing, Control and Maintenances of Supplies] Order 1985 and liquefied Petroleum Gas [Regulation of Supply and Distribution] Order 2000 including suspension/cancellation of the license.

2. For issuing the showcause notice, the licensing authority who issued the said showcause dated 04.06.2020 has laid down the background facts, which are in brief as follows:

1) The petitioner failed to maintain adequate stock of cooking gas at the business place for sale to the bonafide customer(s) whose names are registered with the agency for getting supply of cooking gas and to make home delivery of LPG cylinders at the address of registered customers.

2) During the visit of the Chief Minister in differe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top