Back
INDRAJIT MAHANTY, S. G. CHATTOPADHYAY
Sudipa Nath – Appellant
Versus
Sriram Tarani Kanti – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Indrajit Mahanty; CJ. - The petitioner seeks initiation of contempt proceedings against the respondents for willfully disobeying/disregarding the directions of this Court issued vide order dated 21.12.2021 in WP(C)(PIL) No.30 of 2021, titled as Smt. Sudipa Nath v. Union of India & Ors.
2. PIL was filed by the petitioner herein, inter alia, stating that the Central Government of India, through its various Ministries and Departments has recognized the need to shift to electric vehicles and away from carbon based fuels to ensure protection of the environment. In this regard the Central Government, has taken various initiatives, including but not limited to framing of policies, grant of incentives, and carrying out amendments to the Motor Vehicles Act and Rules framed thereunder. Department of Heavy Industry, had launched schemes, namely Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of (Hybrid &) Electric Vehicles in India (FAME India), for promotion of electric and hybrid vehicles. Another Scheme for Faster Adoption and Manufacturing of Electric Vehicles in India Phase II (FAME India Phase II) was issued with the approval of Union Cabinet for setting up of charging infrastructure, and crea
Failure to classify a vehicle as a Battery Operated Vehicle contrary to statutory definitions constitutes non-compliance with court directives, requiring prompt corrective action.
Point of law: prescription of standards relating to testing and approval for body building of buses/sleeper coaches, as provided under Rule 125C of the Rules, 1989 are applicable to all buses/sleeper....
The provisions of the IBC have an overriding effect over other laws, including the MMVT Act, and that the claims against a corporate debtor in liquidation must be submitted to and decided by the Reso....
The imposition of eligibility conditions for auto rickshaw permits must be backed by statutory authority; the State's requirement for knowledge of Marathi is illegal as it lacks foundation in law.
The Supreme Court upheld the validity of the Madhya Pradesh Motor Vehicles (Taxation of Passengers) Amendment and Validation Act, confirming the imposition of the tax on passengers while allowing ope....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
