Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Tri) 26

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Dr. Sujit Chakma - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) 693 of 2022
Decided On : 03-02-2023

Advocates appeared:
Somik Deb, Advocate, K. Debnath, Advocate, D. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, B. Majumder, Advocate, S. Saha, Advocate

The court affirmed that upon parties entering appearance in writ petitions, the rule is waived, allowing the matter to proceed to hearing.

Headnote:(A) No specific laws or sections cited.

(B) Writ petitions require a thorough examination of the issues presented and rules of procedure.

(C) Petitioner is represented by senior and junior counsel, and respondents are represented by government legal representatives.

(D) Court addressed procedural aspects of the hearing process, indicating that all parties have appeared and pleadings are complete. (E) The court found that the matter is ready for hearing as all procedural requirements have been satisfied. (F) Rule is waived as all parties have entered their appearance, with the case listed for hearing. (G) Parties involved: Petitioner and State of Tripura & Ors. (H) No dissenting opinions present.

Table of Content
1. heard arguments from both parties. (Para 1)
2. procedural aspects and scheduling. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Debnath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned GA assisted by Mr. S. Saha, learned counsel for the respondents-State and Mr. B. Majumder, learned Deputy SGI appearing for the respondents-Union of India.

2. Admit.

3. Issue Rule.

4. Rule is waived since all the parties have already entered their appearance.

5. Exchange of pleadings is complete.

6. List the matter for hearing in its usual course.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document