Back
Next 
2023 Supreme(Tri) 41
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Krishnaika Debbarma - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) 596 of 2022
Decided On : 09-01-2023
Important Points
Admission of a writ petition in appellate matters can proceed without formal rule issuance when all parties appear and pleadings are complete.
Subject
Civil Law - Writ Petition
Headnote
(A) Writ Petition - Issues involving legal representation and procedural adherence in appellate matters - The court admitted the application, waived the issuance of a formal rule as all parties appeared, and noted the completion of pleadings. (Paras 2-6)
Facts of the case:
The petitioner represented by senior counsel contested the actions of the State concerning procedural matters.
Findings of Court:
The matter was listed for hearing in the usual procedural manner, indicating readiness for discussion.
Issues: The core issue addressed was the legal representation and procedural requirements in this court context.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the sufficiency of the appearances of all parties to advance the matter, recognizing the completion of pleadings as a basis for further proceedings.
Result: The writ petition was admitted and set for hearing.
Facts of the case:
The petitioner represented by senior counsel contested the actions of the State concerning procedural matters.
Findings of Court:
The matter was listed for hearing in the usual procedural manner, indicating readiness for discussion.
Issues: The core issue addressed was the legal representation and procedural requirements in this court context.
Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the sufficiency of the appearances of all parties to advance the matter, recognizing the completion of pleadings as a basis for further proceedings.
Result: The writ petition was admitted and set for hearing.
Advocates appeared:
P. Roy Barman, Advocate, K. Nath, Advocate, P. Gautam, Advocate
P. Roy Barman, Advocate, K. Nath, Advocate, P. Gautam, Advocate
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of parties in the case. (Para 1) |
| 2. procedural steps taken in the hearing. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. P. Roy Barman, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. K. Nath, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. P. Gautam, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. Admit.
3. Issue Rule.
4. Rule is waived since all the parties have already entered their appearance.
5. Exchange of pleadings is complete.
6. List the matter for hearing in its usual course.
