Back
ARINDAM LODH
Subhas Chandra Dhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Admit.
3. Issue Rule.
4. Rule is waived since all the parties have already entered their appearance.
5. Exchange of pleadings is complete.
6. List the matter for hearing in its usual course.
Procedural requirements for admitting a writ petition can be waived when all parties have appeared and exchanged pleadings.
The court affirmed that upon parties entering appearance in writ petitions, the rule is waived, allowing the matter to proceed to hearing.
The court ruled on expediting proceedings due to all parties present, emphasizing efficient case management and the need for timely justice.
The court recognized the necessity of adjournment due to the petitioner's death, emphasizing procedural integrity in ongoing legal matters.
The court allowed for the procedural scheduling of a case while providing an opportunity for respondents to file a counter affidavit.
Settlement agreements extinguish the need for judicial review in related matters.
A representative's acceptance of notice nullifies the need for formal notice issuance in a writ petition.
The court allowed the closure of the matter due to the petitioner's demise.
Court allows joint hearing of connected writ petitions for efficiency when parties have appeared.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
