Back
ARINDAM LODH
Subhas Chandra Dhar – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of the counsel for the parties. (Para 1) |
| 2. procedural steps taken in the case. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties.
2. Admit.
3. Issue Rule.
4. Rule is waived since all the parties have already entered their appearance.
5. Exchange of pleadings is complete.
6. List the matter for hearing in its usual course.
Procedural requirements for admitting a writ petition can be waived when all parties have appeared and exchanged pleadings.
Admission of a writ petition in appellate matters can proceed without formal rule issuance when all parties appear and pleadings are complete.
The court affirmed that upon parties entering appearance in writ petitions, the rule is waived, allowing the matter to proceed to hearing.
The court ruled on expediting proceedings due to all parties present, emphasizing efficient case management and the need for timely justice.
The court recognized the necessity of adjournment due to the petitioner's death, emphasizing procedural integrity in ongoing legal matters.
The court allowed for the procedural scheduling of a case while providing an opportunity for respondents to file a counter affidavit.
A court may dismiss a transfer petition as withdrawn if parties report an out-of-court settlement, while granting liberty to approach the court again if necessary.
Writ petition closed upon parties' settlement, no costs imposed.
A petitioner has the right to withdraw a writ petition with the liberty to institute fresh proceedings if the necessity arises later.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
