Back
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Arindam Lodh, J.
Panna Lal & Ors.. - Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura & Ors. - Respondents
Writ Petition (C) No. 805 of 2022
Decided On : 12-01-2023
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. hearing of connected writ petitions. (Para 1) |
| 2. request to hear associated cases. (Para 2) |
| 3. admittance and procedure for notice. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 4. scheduling the matter. (Para 6) |
JUDGMENT
Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. Abir Baran, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned G.A. appearing for the respondents-State.
2. Mr. Deb, learned senior counsel for the petitioners has submitted that other WP(C) No.868 of 2021 and other connected writ petitions similar to this writ petitions have been listed today in the hearing column and he prays for hearing this matter along with those connected writ petitions.
3. Prayer stands allowed.
4. Admit.
5. Issue usual notice.
6. Since all respondents have already entered appearance, no formal notice is called for.
List the matter on 16.01.2023 along with WP(C) No.868 of 2021 and other connected writ petitions
Court allows joint hearing of connected writ petitions for efficiency when parties have appeared.
The court affirmed that upon parties entering appearance in writ petitions, the rule is waived, allowing the matter to proceed to hearing.
The court upheld prior rulings, allowing withdrawal of a similar writ petition while preserving the petitioner's right to challenge future selections if aggrieved.
A representative's acceptance of notice nullifies the need for formal notice issuance in a writ petition.
Pending issues in writ petitions require resolution by the Supreme Court before further proceedings can continue.
Court orders must be clearly interpreted to prevent misconstruction, ensuring compliance is dependent on the outcome of related proceedings.
The court emphasized the necessity for timely completion of administrative inquiries to ensure due process.
Court recognizes the necessity for fair hearing by issuing notice to respondents in a writ petition.
The High Court's power under Article 226 allows judicial intervention when state actions exceed legal bounds and impact fundamental rights.
The court emphasizes the necessity for public authorities to provide timely instructions regarding promotions, ensuring transparency and accountability in administrative procedures.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
