Swapna Debnath vs State of Tripura.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2023 Supreme(Tri) 10

ARINDAM LODH
Swapna Debnath – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura. – Respondent

Advocates appeared:
Somik Deb, Advocate, T. Debbarma, Advocate, D. Bhattacharjee, Advocate, S. Saha, Advocate

Table of Content
1. recourse to past decision on similar matter. (Para 1 , 2)
2. withdrawal of petition provides for future recourse. (Para 3 , 4)

JUDGMENT

Arindam Lodh, J. - Heard Mr. Somik Deb, learned senior counsel assisted by Mr. T. Debbarma, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner. Also heard Mr. D. Bhattacharjee, learned G.A. assisted by Mr. S. Saha, learned counsel appearing for the respondents-State.

2. The subject matter of the instant writ petition is squarely covered by a decision of this court passed in WP(C) No.21 of 2023, where the court directed the respondents to recast/rearrange the select list as regards to Bengali subject. The instant writ petition also relates to Bengali subject and similar prayer has been made in this writ petition.

3. In view of the direction passed in WP(C) No.21 of 2023, Mr. Deb learned senior counsel has not pressed this petition.

4. Accordingly, the instant writ petition stands disposed as withdrawn with liberty to the petitioner to approach the court, if he is aggrieved of the selection process.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document