SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Tri) 6

HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
Biswajit Palit, J.
Sri Tapan Debnath @ Badal - Appellant
Versus
The State of Tripura - Respondent
Crl. Rev. P. No.18 of 2024
Decided On : 12-04-2024

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Alik Das, Adv., for the Petitioner; Mr. Raju Datta, P.P., for the Respondent

The court established that the determination of age and the validity of evidence must be assessed during the trial, not at the discharge stage.

Headnote:

Criminal - POCSO Act - Sections 4, 227 of Cr.P.C., 94 of Juvenile Justice Act - The court emphasized the importance of prima facie evidence in framing charges and the proper procedure for age determination of minors, ultimately rejecting the discharge application due to insufficient grounds.

Fact of the Case:

The accused-petitioner sought discharge from charges under the POCSO Act, claiming the victim was of legal age based on a birth certificate. The trial court rejected this application, leading to a revision petition.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the trial court correctly applied the law regarding discharge under Section 227 of Cr.P.C. and that the evidence presented did not warrant discharge at this stage.

Issues: Whether the trial court erred in rejecting the discharge application based on the alleged age of the victim and the validity of the birth certificate submitted by the accused.

Ratio Decidendi: The court reiterated that at the stage of framing charges, the prosecution's evidence must be assumed true, and the accused's evidence cannot be considered until the trial.

Result: The revision petition was rejected, allowing the trial to proceed.

JUDGMENT & ORDER (ORAL)

Biswajit Palit, J. - Heard Mr. Alik Das, Learned Counsel representing the petitioner and also heard Learned P.P. Mr. Raju Datta representing the State.

2. This revision petition under Section 397 read with Section 401 of Cr.P.C. is filed for setting aside the order dated 13.03.2024 passed by Learned Special Judge, Gomati District, Udaipur in connection with case no.Special no.22 of 2023(POCSO).

3. At the time of hearing, Learned Counsel for the petitioner submitted that the aforesaid case is pending before the Court of Learned Special Judge, Gomati District, Udaipur and before the said Court, the accused-petitioner filed an application for discharging the accused under Section 227 of Cr.P.C on the ground that the victim of this case although has been projected as a minor but from the copy of birth certificate, it appears that she was major on the day of the alleged occurrence of offence. So, no charge can be framed against the accused-petitioner under Section 4 of the POCSO Act. But the Learned Trial Court did not consider the petition and rejected the application of the petitioner-accused and fixed the case for framing of charge.

4. Learned P.P. Mr. Raju Datta representing the prosecution strongly countered the submissions made by Learned Counsel for the petitioner and submitted that there are sufficient materials against the accused-petitioner to frame charge under Section 4 of the POCSO Act in addition to the other charges levelled under IPC and at the stage of framing of charge, there is no scope to consider the application of the accused-petitioner legally. Learned P.P further submitted that during investigation, no such document was submitted stating that the victim of the case was a major one at the time of alleged occurrence of offence. Learned P.P further submitted that it was the duty of the victim to rely upon that document and to submit application to the Court rather the accused petitioner has come forward with the prayer and moreso, the victim is a Bangladeshi national. So, without verification, there is no scope to rely upon the birth certificate submitted by the accused-petitioner and further submitted that to ascertain the actual age of the victim, the I.O. during investigation arranged for conducting ossification test of the victim from which it appears that she was a minor. So, Learned P.P. prayed for dismissal of the petition filed by the accused-petitioner.

5. I have heard detailed argument of both the sides and gone through the record of the Learned Court below which is called for.

6. In the instant matter, on the basis of suo moto complaint laid by one SI Sandipan Deb of Natunbazar P.S. Amarpur under Gomati District to O/C NTB P.S. under Amarpur Sub-division. The O/C, NTB P.S. registered NTB P.S. case no.40/2023 under Section 366(B)/370/120-B/201/376(3) of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act and after completion of investigation, the I.O. has laid charge-sheet against the accused-petitioner vide NTB P.S. C.S. no.38/2023 under Section 366(B)/370/120-B/201/376(3) of IPC and Section 4 of POCSO Act. Accordingly, cognizance was taken by the Special Judge and the case is pending for disposal before the Learned Special Judge, Gomati District, Udaipur.

7. In course of hearing of argument, Learned Counsel for the accused-petitioner submitted that during investigation, the accused-petitioner was released on bail by this Court vide order dated 18.10.2023 in connection with BA/48/2023 and at the time of hearing of bail application, the accused-petitioner submitted the birth certificate of the victim from which it appeared that her date of birth was 12.01.2004 and the birth certificate was issued by the authority of the Government of Bangladesh. However, the I.O. during investigation without relying upon the same proceeded for conducting ossification test of the victim and submitted that the victim was a minor and accordingly, laid charge-sheet under the relevant provisions of law including the POCSO Act.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top