Back
HIGH COURT OF TRIPURA AGARTALA
BISWAJIT PALIT
Partha Pratim Das, S/o. Late Kusum Kr. Das – Appellant
Versus
State of Tripura, Represented by its Secretary, PWD (R & B), Government of Tripura, New Secretariat Complex – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
BISWAJIT PALIT, J.
The present petitioners have filed this writ petition seeking the following reliefs :
i) Issue notice upon the Respondents.
ii) Call for the records.
iii) Issue rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the Petitioners shall not be granted the benefit of ACP-II from the date of completion of 17 years of service upon upgradation to the Post of Junior engineer (Electrical) (Grade-I) along with all arrears of financial benefit.
AND
Issue rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why the Petitioners shall not be granted the benefit of MACP-III from the date of completion of another 8 years of service upon grant of ACP-II benefit in terms of the prayer above alongwith all arrears of financial benefit.
AND
Issue rule calling upon the Respondents to show cause as to why appropriate direction shall not be issued for fixation of pay of the Petitioners upon grant of ACP-II and MACP- III benefits and further issue appropriate Writ to grant the Petitioners arrears of such financial benefit.
iv) And after hearing the parties, be pleased to make the rule absolute.
AND/OR
Pass any other Order/Orders as deemed fit and proper.
AND
For this act of kindness
The court ruled that employees who have not received promotions are entitled to ACP-II and MACP-III benefits, despite clarifications suggesting otherwise.
Eligibility for ACP/MACP benefits is determined based on the conditions of the schemes and the promotions earned by the employees.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that pay scale rationalization should be ignored for the purpose of the first financial upgradation under the ACP Scheme, based on the application ....
The applicant is entitled to ACP and MACP benefits despite prior promotions since non-beneficial promotions do not negate financial upgradation under the schemes.
Employment financial upgradation under MACP is distinct from promotion; it's based on immediate grade pay hierarchy, not promotional hierarchy.
Financial upgradation under the Revised Assured Career Progression Scheme is warranted upon completion of 30 years of service, irrespective of subsequent promotions.
The Court clarified the difference between the replacement scale and upgradation in pay scale under the Assured Career Progression Scheme, emphasizing that the revision in pay scale is distinct from ....
Retrospective application of the MACP Scheme does not infringe upon the vested rights of employees under the ACP Scheme, as eligibility does not equate to entitlement.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
