SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HARISH CHANDER, V.RAJAMANICKAM
Calcutta Steel Industries – Appellant
Versus
Collector of Central Excise – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
P.S. Bedi, K.K. Patel,L.P. Asthana, Vijay Zutshi

ORDER

V. Rajamanickam, Member (T)

1. Out of above 164 Appeals, 10 Appeals from S.No. 154 to 163 have been filed by the Department and the issues involved in respect of 106 Appeals pertain to the period from 01-08-1983 to 29-02-1988 and the remaining 56 Appeals pertain to the period from 01-03-l988 onwards. On an identical issue, M/s. Ajanta Steel Corporation have filed an Appeal in E/Appeal No. 2784/89-B1 and the Department has also filed an Appeal against the Order of the C.C.E.(Appeals) in E/Appeal No. 2792/89-B1. All the Appeals pertain to the orders passed by the Collector of Central Excise (Appeals) in respect of classification of the products of Iron and Steel as per the Tariff prevailing during the relevant periods. The issues involved in all the appeals being common are taken up for issue of a consolidated common order.

2. During the period from 01-08-1983 to 27-02-1986, the Tariff Item 25 covered Iron and Steel, and products thereof, definitions of the various products among others, viz. Hoops, Strips, Flats and Bars were incorporated.

For the period from 01-08-1983 to 27-02-1986, under the revised Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, Chapter 72 was introduced, and the definitions

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top