SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI, SANJAY KUMAR DWIVEDI
Pushpa Dave @ Devi – Appellant
Versus
Udai Kumar Rajgarhia – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Heard Mr. Sanjay Kumar Tiwari, learned counsel for the appellants and A.K. Sahani, learned counsel for the respondents.
2. This second appeal has been filed being aggrieved and dissatisfied with order dated 10.07.2002 passed by the learned District Judge, Dhanbad in Title Appeal No. 72 of 2001 which was preferred against the judgment and decree dated 31.07.1997 passed in Title Suit No. 17 of 1988.
3. The Title Suit No. 17 of 1988 was instituted by the respondents/plaintiffs against the appellants for declaration of their right over the suit property and for confirmation of possession of finding that deed of cancellation dated 02.06.1988 made by the defendants nos. 1 to 6 is illegal and inoperative and is not binding on the plaintiffs and for permanent injunction on the ground that on the basis of deed of gift dated 07.01.1985 executed by defendant no.1 the plaintiffs have acquired a valid right, title and possession. The said suit was decreed in favour of the respondents/plaintiffs. Aggrieved with that first appeal was filed which was dismissed by the learned appellate court vide judgment dated 10.07.2002.
4. The case of the plaintiffs/respondents in plaint is that the sui
Bhivchandra Shankar More vs. Balu Gangaram More and Ors.
J. Kumardasan Nair and Anr. vs. Iric Sohan and Ors.
Brijesh Kumar and Ors. vs. State of Haryana and Ors.
Esha Bhattacharjee vs. Raghunathpur Nafar Academy
Ramlal, Motilal and Chhotelal Vrs. Rewa Coalfields Ltd.
Basawaraj and Anr. vs. Spl. Land Acquisition Officer
Manindra Land and Building Corporation Ltd. vs. Bhutnath Banerjee and Ors.
Maniben Devraj Shah vs. Municipal Corporation of Brihan Mumbai
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.