PATNA HIGH COURT
Purnendu Singh, J.
Surendra Prasad Sharma and Ors. – Petitioners
versus
State of Bihar through the Principal Secretary and Ors. – Respondents
Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16140 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16145 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16189 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16192 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16369 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16500 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16563 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16640 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16672 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16677 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16683 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16684 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16686 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16687 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16688 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16713 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16719 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16720 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16740 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.16995 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17149 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17210 of 2022 with Civil Writ Jurisdiction Case No.17289 of 2022
Decided on 30.1.2023
(A) Registration Act, 1908 – Section 68-A – Prohibition on unlicensed person – Registration law governs documents rather than transactions – No violation of any terms of license was found in case of petitioners or other similarly situated licensees, who were in majority – A citizen has right to carry on profession, any occupation, trade or business subject to limitations – State cannot make discrimination between citizens who are qualified to carry on profession, trade or business – Power of State to raise revenue by levying taxes and fees should not be confused with power of State to prohibit or regulate trade or business in question. [Bihar Deed Writers Licensing Rules, 1996 – Rules 6, 9(e), 13, 15 and 21]. (Paras 29, 32 and 42)
(B) Registration Act, 1908 – Section 68-A – Prohibition on unlicensed person – High Court in exercise of its powers of judicial review cannot interfere with policy decisions of State unless same can be faulted on grounds of mala fide, unreasonableness, arbitrariness or unfairness – Policy to allow modal based registration in present case can be an aspect of reasonable restriction in interest of general public – Until State comes with specific Rule for registration based on modal deed and change terms and conditions of license, right of hundreds of deed writers cannot be defeated by rendering them redundant by not accepting hand written deed even there being no violation of any terms and conditions of license must not be further prohibited in any manner in presenting deed documents drawn in their handwriting for registration. [Bihar Deed Writers Licensing Rules, 1996 – Rules 6, 9(e), 13, 15 and 21]. (Paras 47, 52, 55, 58 and 59)
Result: Writ Petition allowed.
JUDGMENT (ORAL)
Heard Mr. Ranjeet Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and Mr. Vikash Kumar, learned SC-11 for the State.
2. The petitioner has filed the present writ petition inter alia filed for following reliefs:—
“(i) For setting aside Clause 17 of Minutes of the Meeting Dated 21.10.2022 passed under the Chairmanship of the Additional Chief Secretary, Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, whereby General Slot of Registration through Deed Writters has been closed, in teeth of Section 68A & 68B of the Registration Act r/w The Bihar Deed Writers License Rule 1996 as also in gross violation and disregard of the Judgment Dated 17.09.2016 passed by this Hon’ble Court in CWJC No.10973/2016, C.W.J.C. No.11384/2016 and analogous cases whereby the Hon’ble Court observed that so long as The Deed Writers License Rule 1996 is in force, the Deed Writers who have valid license cannot be restrained from writing documents for registration. (No formal order has been issued in the light of the said minutes of the meeting, but same has already been implemented throughout Bihar).
(ii) For that the respondents authorities be directed to stop the slot system (25 Deed for each Slot) created during Pendemic COVID 19, for the reason that all issued by the Department of Home, Government of Bihar, Patna has been withdrawn, but the authorities of the Registration Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna is following the Slot system arbitrarily and with a view to frustrate the interest of Licensee (Deed Writers) in teeth of the Judgment Dated 17.09.2016 passed in CWJC No. 10973/ 2016, C.W.J.C. No.11384/2016 and analogous cases.
(iii) For that the petitioners further prays that the Quota System for Online Registration and Registration through Deed Writers be withdrawn, as it is being used to remove the Deeds from discharging their right to work as Deed Writers, which is; indirectly if not directly, in teeth of the Judgment Dated 17.09.2016 passed in CWJC No. 10973/2016, C.W.J.C. No.11384/2016 and analogous cases, and further the quota system for online registration and registration through Deed Writers is unknown to the Registration Act, 1908 and Rule framed there.
(iv) For taking strict punitive action against the authorities of the Registration, Excise and Prohibition Department, Government of Bihar, Patna, who by hooks and crooks trying to frustrate the outcome of the Judgment Dated 17.09.2016 passed in CWJC No. 10973/2016, C.W.J.C. No.11384/2016 and analogous cases and even cheated and ditch this Hon’ble Court in M.J.C. No.1355/2022.
(v) For issuance of Direction to the Respondents authorities to allow the petitioners to work as Deed Writer and his hand written documents as well as his Drafted and computerized Documents with his signature be accepted for registration in the light of the Judgment 17.09.2016 passed in CWJC No.10973/2016, C.W.J.C. No.11384/2016 and analogous cases.
(vi) For any other relief/reliefs for which the petitioners may be deemed entitled to.”
3. Brief facts of the case are that an amendment was brought in The Registration Act, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’) vide Registration (Bihar Amendment) Act, 1991 (Act 6 of 1991). Following sections were inserted after Section 68:—
“68-A Prohibition of unlicensed person—(1) No person who is not licensed as provided under Section 68-B, shall engage himself in the profession of document writer and document drawn up and signed by a person who does not hold a license shall not be accepted for registration by the Registring Officers;
Provided that no advocate, pleader or mukhtar shall be required to have a license under 68-B.
(2) Nothing in this section shall prohibit an executant of document to draw up a document to be presented for registration or to do any other act for himself for which a licensed document writer could have been otherwise engaged.
(3) Nothing in this section sha
Manohar Lal vs. Ugrasen and Ors.
Khoday Distilleries Ltd. and Ors. vs. State of Karnataka and Ors.
Akshay N. Patel vs. Reserve Bank of India
Ugar Sugar Works Ltd. vs. Delhi Administration and Ors.
Registration law governs documents rather than transactions – Until State comes with specific Rule for registration based on modal deed and change terms and conditions of license, right of hundreds o....
The impugned circular and Rule 44(1)(i) were found to be contrary to sections 34 and 35 of the Registration act, 1908 and beyond the legislative competence of the respondents.
Section 77-A of the Registration Act is unconstitutional for excessive delegation of powers to cancel registered documents, violating principles of judicial independence and due process.
The constitutionality of Section 22A of the Registration Act, 1908 was upheld, establishing that legislative provisions to prevent fraudulent transfers are valid and necessary for public policy prote....
The limitation of four months under Section 23 of the Registration Act should not prevent the registration of court decrees, as they are eternal unless varied, modified, or set aside by a higher judi....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the duty of the registering authority to register a document complying with statutory requirements and the lack of legal force of workshop guidelin....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.