IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
P. NAVEEN RAO, J.
Prem Singh Rathore, S/o. Manohar Singh Rathore - Petitioner
Versus
T. Raia Sinoh, S/o. Late T. Naval Singh and others - Respondents
Election Petition No. 15 of 2019
Decided On : 11-03-2022
The Court held that the non-disclosure of criminal cases in the affidavit filed by the elected candidate amounts to corrupt practice and declared his election as void.
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner challenged the election of the first respondent alleging that he committed several omissions and commission of Model Code of Conduct, violated various provisions of the Act, 1951 and his actions/conduct would amount to indulging in corrupt practices. The first respondent denied the allegations and asserted that he had complied with all the required formalities including filing of affidavit in Form No.26.
Finding of the Court:
The Court found that the first respondent had not disclosed eight criminal cases pending against him in the affidavit filed in Form No. 26, which amounts to suppression of true information and corrupt practice.
Issues: Whether the first respondent suppressed material information about the pending criminal cases in the affidavit in Form-26 filed along with the nomination to contest election to the State Legislative Assembly from Goshamahal Assembly Constituency Number 65, thereby incurring disqualification and declaration of his selection as void.
Ratio Decidendi: The Court held that the purpose and objective of dissemination of information about background of the candidate more particularly the criminal background of the candidate is necessary for the electorate to make conscious decision/ choice from any one of the contestants, therefore all the information concerning the candidate must be disclosed. Section 33-A vests right in the electorate and non-disclosure of the information offends the right of the electorate, therefore non-dissemination of information by a candidate has to be viewed as amounting to deliberate and willful suppression and misleading the electorate from taking an informed decision. Nondisclosure of relevant information is also a corrupt practice and as per Section 100 (1) (b) the Election Tribunal can declare the election of an elected candidate as void, if the corrupt practice is proved.
Final Decision: The Court declared the election of the first respondent as void.
ORDER :
Heard Sri V. Ravinder Rao, learned senior counsel appearing for petitioner and Sri V. Hari Haran, learned senior counsel appearing for respondent no.1.
2. On 6.10.2018 schedule for conducting elections for the States of Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan, Mizoram and Telangana were announced by the Election Commission of India. The election schedule is as under :
| Date of issue of Gazette Notification | 12.11.2018 (Monday) |
| Last date of Nomination | 19.11.2018 (Monday) |
| Date for Scrutiny of Nomination | 20.11.2018 (Tuesday) |
| Date for withdrawal of candidates | 22.11.2018 (Thursday) |
| Date of Polling | 07.12.2018 (Friday) |
| Date of Counting | 11.12.2018 (Tuesday) |
| Date of completion of the election | 13.12.2018 (Thursday) |
3. Accordingly, Gazettee notification was published on 12.11.2018 calling for elections to the Telangana State Assembly. Petitioner was nominated by the Telangana Rastra Samithi party to contest the election to the Member of Legislative Assembly from Goshamahal Assembly Constituency Number 65. Petitioner submitted his nomination paper No.36/65/2018 on 19.11.2018. He has complied with all the required formalities including filing of affidavit in Form No.26. The first respondent was sitting Member of Legislative Assembly from Goshamahal Constituency representing Bharatiya Janata Party. He was again nominated to contest on behalf of Bharatiya Janata Party from Goshamahal Assembly Constituency. The first respondent filed nomination papers on 12.11.2018 and again on 19.11.2018.
4. Respondents 2 to 24 have also submitted their nomination papers. On scrutiny of nomination papers, the Returning Officer of the Goshamahal Assembly Constituency, declared the petitioner and respondents 1 to 24 as validly nominated to contest the Assembly elections 2018 for Goshamahal Assembly Constituency. Petitioner further submits that on filing of nomination papers, the Returning Officer supplied books which deal with ‘Dos and Don’ts’ ‘Hand Book for Candidates’ ‘Polling Agents Manual’ and other election regulatory books and material to all the nominated candidates.
5. In the elections conducted on 07.12.2018 first respondent secured 61,806 votes, whereas petitioner secured 44,902 votes and as first respondent secured more votes than any other candidate contesting the elections, he was declared as elected on 13.12.2018. After the first respondent, petitioner secured more votes than other candidates who contested in the election.
6. In this Election Petition, petitioner challenges the election of first respondent alleging that he committed several omissions and commission of Model Code of Conduct, violated various provisions of the Act, 1951 and his actions/conduct would amount to indulging in corrupt practices. He prays to declare the election of first respondent as null and void and consequently to declare the petitioner as duly elected to the Legislative Assembly Goshamahal Constituency No.65.
6.1. Petitioner avers that being sitting Member of Legislative Assembly, the first respondent was expected to know all aspects of contesting elections including ‘Model Code of Conduct’ which was in force from 6.10.2018. Petitioner contends that from the date of issuance of press note dated 6.10.2018, first respondent committed innumerable corrupt practices such as calling the voters by way of appeasing the electors/voters on the ground of religion and cow, cow slaughter, provocation and inducement to the electors/voters, appealed to the voters using National flag, photos and idols of religious Gods, promoting the feelings of enmity between the classes of the citizens on the ground of religion and made statements touching the personal character and conduct of the petitioner which prejudicially affected the election of the petitioner and other contestants.
6.2. It is further contended that first respondent incurred expe
Vishwanath Reddy Vs. Konappa Rudrappa Nadgouda
Thiru John v. Returning Officer
Muniraju Gowda P.M. v. Munirathna
Resurgence India vs. Election Commission of India and another
Abhiram Singh vs. C.D. Commachen (dead) by LRs and others
M. Manohar Reddy v. Union of India
Union of India v. Assn. for Democratic Reforms and another
Public Interest Foundation v. Union of India
Kisan Shankar Kathore v. Arun Dattatray Sawant
Manohar Joshi v. Damodar Tatyaba
Jeet Mohinder Singh v. Harminder Singh Jassi
Gajanan Krishnaji Bapat v. Dattaji Raghobaji Meghe
Baldev Singh Mann v. Surjit Singh Dhiman
Laxmi Narayan Nayak v. Ramratan Chaturvedi
Kona Prabhakara Rao v. M. Seshagiri Rao
Manphul Singh v. Surinder Singh
Jumuna Prasad Mukhariya v. Lachhi Ram
Ram Sharan Yadav v. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh
M. Narayana Rao v. G. Venkata Reddy [(1977) 1 SCC 771 : (1977) 1 SCR 490
Lakshmi Raman Acharya v. Chandan Singh
Ramji Prasad Singh v. Ram Bilas Jha
Pratap Singh v. Rajinder Singh
Ram Sharan Yadav v. Thakur Muneshwar Nath Singh
Daulat Ram Chauhan v. Anand Sharma
The failure to disclose the details of the pending criminal case is a corrupt practice, and the court directed the Secretary of the Legislative Council of Andhra Pradesh to make a reference to the Pr....
Candidates must fully disclose criminal cases and asset details during elections, as failure constitutes corrupt practice under the Representation of People Act, impacting informed voting.
Election - Qualification/Disqualification - Non-disclosure of offence/criminal cases - Election of petitioner is liable to be set aside on account of nondisclosure of Criminal Case which amounts to u....
The election petition was dismissed due to failure to prove that the alleged non-compliance with election affidavit laws materially affected the election outcome.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.