SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 128

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K. LAKSHMAN, J.
Nandu Lal Agarwal - Appellant
Versus
Kunamneni Sambasiva Rao - Respondent
Election Petition No.3 Of 2024
Decided On : 09-06-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : RAMESH KUTHUMBAKA
For the Respondent: SAI PRASEN GUNDAVARAM

The election petition was dismissed due to failure to prove that the alleged non-compliance with election affidavit laws materially affected the election outcome.

Headnote:(A) Representation of the People Act, 1951 - Sections 81, 100, 101, 125A - Election petition challenging the election of respondent No.1 due to non-compliance with affidavit Form-26 and other alleged irregularities - Petitioner claims that the affidavit was not validly notarized and failed to disclose the spouse's name. (Paras 2-3)

(B) Election Process - Purity of elections should not be compromised lightly; an election petitioner must show that alleged irregularities materially affected the election outcome. (Paras 19, 26)

(C) Notarization Validity - The notarization of the affidavit was contested on the grounds of the notary's qualifications, but due to subsequent renewal, the court found no fault. (Paras 20, 36)

(D) Disclosure of Information - Court held that the election petitioner did not prove that non-disclosure of the spouse's name materially affected the election outcome as required under Section 100. (Paras 10, 12, 44) (E) Result - The court, after reviewing the evidence, upheld the election of respondent No.1, dismissing the petitioner's claims and emphasizing that proper compliance with election laws is crucial but should not negate valid elections without substantial proof. (Result) Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. factual background of the election petition. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. arguments of the election petitioner regarding violations. (Para 4 , 5)
3. court's determination of issues framed for trial. (Para 6 , 8)
4. defenses presented by respondent no.1 and their implications. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. legal standards regarding election petition outcomes. (Para 12 , 24 , 25)
6. issue of evidence and compliance with statutory requirements. (Para 17)
7. conclusion about the election's validity and its implications. (Para 19 , 20)
8. election outcomes are protected unless substantial grounds for interference exist. (Para 22 , 23)

ORDER :

K. LAKSHMAN, J.

Heard Mr. Ramesh Kuthumbaka, learned counsel for Election Petitioner, Mr. G. Vidya Sagar, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. Sai Prasen Gundavaram, learned counsel for respondent No.1, Mr. K. Durga Prasad, learned counsel representing Mr. Ramesh Katikineni, learned counsel for respondent Nos.2 & 16, Mr. Ravi Chandra Sekhar, learned counsel for respondent No.4. None appears for respondent No.15.

2. The Election Petitioner filed the present Election Petition under Section - 81 read with 100, 101 and 125A of the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 and Rule - 3 of the Rules to Regulate the trial of Election Petitions under the Representation of Peoples Act, 1951, seeking the following reliefs:

i. to declare the election of Respondent No.1 as Returned Candidate for 117- Kothagudem Assembly Constituency, Telangana State as null and void under Section - 100(1)(d)(iv) of Representation of Peoples Act, 1951 as respondent No.1 failed to comply Form-26 Affidavit prescribed by Rule - 4A of the CONDUCT OF ELECTION RULES 1961.

ii. to declare respondent No.2 as Returned Candidate for 117 -Kothagudem Assembly Constituency, Bhadhradri - Kothagudem District, Telangana State, under Section - 101 read with 98 (c) and 84 of R.P. Act, 1951 with effect from 04.12.2023.

iii. to impose imprisonment and penalty under Section - 125 A (iii) of the RP Act, 1951 against respondent No.1 under Section - 99 of RP Act, 1951 for his failure to furnish the required information, concealing the material information and for giving false Form-26 affidavit dated 08.11.2023, which is prescribed by Rule - 4A of the CONDUCT OF ELECTION RULES 1961.

iv. to communicate the decision of this Court in this matter to the Election Commission of India and the Speaker of the Telangana Legislative Assembly in terms of Section - 103 of the RP Act, 1951.

v. to Grant costs of the petition.

3. The election petitioner has filed this election petition contending as follows:

i) He is the resident of Kothagudem Town which comes under 117-Kothagudem Assembly Constituency. His Aadhar Card Number is 7175 6675 8671 and Voter ID Number is KYT 1505502.

ii) Vide Memo No.4004/Elecs.D/A1/2023-1, dated 09.10.2023 and Gazette Notification No.37, dated 03.11.2023 issued by the Election Commission of India (for short ‘ECI’), the following schedule of elections was declared to elect the Members to the Telangana State Legislative Assembly-2023 for total 119 Assembly Constituencies in Single Phase including 117-Kothagudem Assembly Constituency.

a) Date to file the nominations : 03.11.2023 to 10.11.2023

b) Scrutiny of nomination papers : 13.11.2023

c) Polling Date : 30.11.2023

d) Counting and declaration of result : 03.12.2023

iii) Respondent No.1 contested in the said election as a candidate set up by the Communist Party of India (CPI), while respondent No.2 contested as a candidate set up by the All India Forward Bloc Party’. Apart from them, 28 other candidates also contested in the said election for the Post of MLA to 117-Kothagudem Assembly Constituency (hereinafter referred to as ‘Subject Constituency’).

iv) The petitioner cast his vote in the said election conducted on 03.12.2023 for the subject constituency. Results were declared and respondent No.1 was declared as ‘Returned Candidate’ for the subject constituency, and Gazette Notification No.44, dated 04.12.202
























































Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top