Back
P.NAVEEN RAO, G.RADHA RANI
Indian Immunologicals Limited, Rep. by its Managing Director – Appellant
Versus
Narendra Agrawal, S/o. Late Shri Nathulal Agrawal – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
P. Naveen Rao, J.
Heard learned senior Counsel Sri C.R. Sridharan for learned counsel for appellants Sri G.V.S. Ganesh, first respondent in person, Sri Namavarapu Rajeshwar Rao, learned Assistant Solicitor General for second respondent and Mrs. Anjali Agarwal, learned counsel for third respondent.
2. Before recording rival contentions, the litigative history leading to the filing of this writ appeal is noted hereunder:
2.1. First respondent herein was appointed as Manager Grade-III by proceedings dated 2.3.3007 in the Indian Immunological Limited (for short IIL); he was promoted as Manager Grade-II with effect from 1.4.2013 and by circular orders dated 20.3.2014 he was given full charge of Marketing, HR, Training and Development of entire marketing work force. It appears, problems mounted on first respondent some time from November, 2014. On 25.11.2014, first respondent was asked to vacate his cabin and to share office space with a far junior to him. His application for casual leave on 26.11.2014 was rejected. He has escalated his grievances in the form of a representation dated 25.11.2014 and mail dated 22.12.2014. Instead of attending to his grievances, an office order was
A writ petition under Article 226 is not maintainable against a private employer for contractual termination unless it involves a public law element.
Probationary employees have limited protections under Article 311, permitting non-stigmatic terminations based on suitability assessments without the full rigor of disciplinary proceedings.
A writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution is not maintainable against a private company, even if it discharges a public function, unless the contract of service is governed or regulated b....
![Director, CSIR-CIMFR [Central Institute of Mining and Fuel Research] VS Mayuresh Dash, S/o. Sri Rabindra Kumar Dash - 2024 Supreme(Jhk) 43](https://supremetoday-s3.b-cdn.net/Jharkhand_3.png)
Probationers in permanent posts are entitled to protections under the Central Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1965, and terminations based on stigmatic allegations must fol....
Termination of a probationary employee for unsatisfactory performance is lawful and non-stigmatic, requiring no formal inquiry or prior warning.
Termination under CCS (Temporary Service) Rules Rule 5(1) is punitive if founded on specific misconduct without formal enquiry, even if order appears simpliciter; requires reinstatement with liberty ....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
