Back
M. NAGAPRASANNA
SHARADHA L. DODMANI W/O SHANKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KARNATAKA – Respondent
ORDER :
1. The petitioner is before this Court calling in question an order dated 27-07-2018 by which the services of the petitioner were terminated and as a consequential relief seeks a direction by issuance of a writ in the nature of mandamus to reinstate her into service as an Accountant in the 3rd respondent/District Town Municipal Cell, Bagalkot.
2. The facts, in brief, are as follows:
3. After the said direction being issued, a show
Once the learned Single Judge having seen the records and come to the conclusion that the industry was not functioning after January, 1995, there is no justification in entering a different finding w....
The court affirmed that reinstatement is essential for resuming disciplinary proceedings, clarifying that an employee not suspended cannot be deemed suspended following a remit to reconsider a prior ....
If misconduct is the foundation to pass the order, then an enquiry into misconduct should be conducted and an action according to law should follow. But if it is (sic) notice, it is not incumbent upo....
A termination order based on allegations of misconduct without conducting a departmental inquiry is stigmatic and punitive in nature, requiring compliance with principles of natural justice.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
