SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 67

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
SUREPALLI NANDA, J.
Sunil G. Manghanani – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, represented by its & others - Respondents
W.P. No. 16107 of 2018
Decided on : 05-06-2023

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr E. Madan Mohan Rao
For the Respondents:G.P for General Admn. Advocate General

Headnote:

Right To Information Act, 2005 - Section 19 (6), 8(1), (a)(e)(h), 22, 2(f), (i), (h) - Indian Evidence Act, 1872 - Section 74, 123 - Land - Furnish information regarding evacuee property allotted - Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent no.2 and 3 to furnish information pertaining to information of Evacuee Property allotted in favor of late Smt. Radhibai Manghanani in respect of land - Held, Court opines that contention as per letter that information cannot be provided to petitioner under Section 8(1)(a)(e)(h) of RTI Act, 2005 cannot be sustained - By reason of Section 22 of RTI Act, provisions of RTI Act 2005 shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law - It only means that even if there is a question of privilege involved, RTI Act compels furnishing of information unless and until furnishing of information is barred, under Section 8(1) of RTI Act - Even if Muntakah is considered as privileged document under Section 74 read with 123 of Evidence Act still public authority as defined under Section 2(h) of RTI Act cannot refuse to furnish same to applicant - Respondents 2 and 3 are directed to furnish information to petitioner as sought for by petitioner vide application, filed under provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005, which was received by 3rd respondent - Writ petition is allowed.

ORDER :

Heard the Learned Counsel for the Petitioner, learned Government Pleader for General Administration and Learned Advocate General appearing for Respondents.

2. This Writ Petition is filed praying to issue a Writ of Mandamus directing Respondent no.2 and 3 to furnish information pertaining to information of Evacuee Property allotted in favor of late Smt. Radhibai Manghanani in respect of land admeasuring Ac.11.23 guntas in Survey Nos. 181, 212, 234, 292, 488 and 489 of Machirevula Village of Rajendranagar Mandal in Rangareddy District through allotment order No. Hyd-59, dated 07.03.1969 and sanadNo.RSC(b)/LAND/HYD-59, dated 25.11.1970 in favour of Smt. Radhibhai and request to furnish all the papers in current file and note file of the above said allotment order No.HYD-59 dated 07.03.1969 in the file No.SEP3/212/1982 issued by Settlement Commissioner, Bombay and direct the respondent No.2 & 3 to furnish basic property register (BPR), SEP3 P.Rs. (personal register) for the year 1982 and record register for the years 1982, 1983, 2017, 2022 and 2023 under Right To Information Act, 2005.

3. The case of the petitioner, in brief, is as follows:

a) Petitioner on 27.04.2017 had made an application by paying requisite fee, to respondent no. 4 under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 requesting to furnish information regarding the evacuee property allotted in favour of late Smt. Radhibai Manghnani in respect of land admeasuring Ac.11.23 guntas in Survey Nos. 181, 212, 234, 292, 488 and 489 of Machirevula Village of Rajendranagar Mandal in Rangareddy District through allotment order No. Hyd-59, dated 07.03.1969 and sanadNo.RSC(b)/LAND/HYD59, dated 25.11.1970 and to furnish all papers issued by the Settlement Commissioner, Bombay.

b) In response to the application of the petitioner, respondent no.4 addressed a letter vide CCLA U.O. Note RTI/475/2017, dated 29.04.2017 to the Assistant Secretary (Settlements), office of respondent no.2 to furnish information as sought in the petitioner’s application.

c) The Assistant Secretary (Settlements), O/o respondent no. 2 vide letter U.O.NoteSettleII/250/2017 dated 26.05.2017 stated that the personal registers are maintained in chronological order and that personal register of 1982 of SEP3 is not available and that the record section was once again requested to trace the personal record and that soon after the same would be supplied to the petitioner.

d) Aggrieved by the orders, petitioner preferred an Appeal dated 01.06.2017 before Appellate Authority i.e., 3rd respondent, under the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 and the 3rd respondent till date had not disposed off the petitioner’s appeal.

e) Moreover, under Section 19 (6) of Right to Information Act, 2005, respondent no.3 is bound to dispose of the appeal within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of the same. Even though, the petitioner’s appeal was on 01.06.2017, which had been received by the respondent no.3 office on 05.06.2017, no orders have been passed by the rd respondent till as on date.

f) Delay in furnishing the requisite information to the petitioner, not only amounts to the contravening the provisions of Right to Information Act, 2005 but is also causing hardships to the petitioner. Hence the Writ Petition.

4. The case of the respondents, in brief, is as follows:

a) Against the appeal preferred by the petitioner, the then Public Information Officer (PIO)issued Note vide No.RTI/475/17 dated 21.06.2017 to the Assistant Secretary (Settlement) & Deemed Public Information Officer informing Personal Registers of SEP3 Seat only has been traced by the Record Section and had been forwarded to the Settlement Section along with the copy of the petitioner’s 1st appeal and requesting to furnish the information to the petitioner and the same had been informed to the petitioner. b) In response, the Assistant Secre

                Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                1
                2
                3
                4
                5
                6
                7
                8
                9
                10
                11
                SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                supreme today icon
                logo-black

                An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                Please visit our Training & Support
                Center or Contact Us for assistance

                qr

                Scan Me!

                India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
                whatsapp-icon Back to top