Back
ALOK ARADHE, N. V. SHRAVAN KUMAR
K. Madhava Reddy – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, J.
1. Heard Mr. D. Prakash Reddy, learned Senior Counsel representing Ms. Divya Adepu, learned counsel for the appellants in W.A. Nos. 43, 120, 121, 181, 182 and 183 of 2009 and respondent Nos. 2 and 3 in W.A. No. 131 of 2009.
2. Mr. V. Narasimha Goud, learned Standing Counsel for Hyderabad Metropolitan Development Authority.
3. Mr. Harender Pershad, learned Special Government Pleader appearing for the appellants for the State of Telangana in W.A. Nos. 131, 139, 367 and 372 of 2009 and for the respondents-State in all the appeals.
4. Mr. L. Ravi Chander, learned Senior Counsel representing Mr. K.R. Prabhakar, learned counsel for the appellants in W.A. No. 474 of 2009 and for the respondents in W.A. No. 139 of 2009.
5. Mr. O. Manoher Reddy, learned Senior Counsel appearing for the appellant/Housing Board Employees IV-Phase Plot Allottees Welfare Association in W.A. No. 525 of 2009 and appearing for the respondent No. 1 in W.A. Nos. 367 and 372 of 2009.
6. All these intra Court appeals have arisen out of the common order dated 30.12.2008 passed in W.P. Nos. 8048 of 2001, 19790, 19795 and 22657 of 2006 by the learned Single Judge.
7. Since the issues involved in
The court upheld the doctrine of legitimate expectation, ruling that failure to honor governmental commitments can render actions arbitrary and justifiable under Article 14, necessitating relief for ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the doctrine of legitimate expectation does not apply when the allotment was made in 1994 and the subsequent disposal of plots had to be condu....
If an announcement is made by the Government of a policy conferring benefit on a large number of people, but subsequently, due to overriding public interest, the benefits that were announced earlier ....
The cancellation of allotments of public premises to eminent artists under a discretionary quota was not arbitrary or violative of legitimate expectations, where the artists did not have an indefeasi....
Public authorities cannot cite internal policy limitations to deny alternative plots when the initial failure to deliver possession arises from their own lack of due diligence, as such conduct consti....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the lease-cum-sale agreement and the determination of the Panchayat's right over the property.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
