SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Telangana) 463

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
ALOK ARADHE, N.V. SHRAVAN KUMAR, JJ.

The Government of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by Secretary, Revenue Department and Others - Appellants
Versus
V. Tulasiram and Others - Respondents
Writ Appeal No.1875 Of 2013
Decided On : 26-09-2023

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellants : Mr. B.S. Prasad.
For the Respondents: Dr. Adithya Sondhi, Learned Senior Counsel representing M/s. Bharadwaj Associates.

Headnote:

Jagir Land - Land Ownership Dispute - Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulation, 1358 Fasli, Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli, Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 - The court discussed the validity of the Jagir Regulation and the power of the State Government to determine land ownership. It highlighted the need for civil court adjudication and the limitations of the State Government's authority in land ownership disputes.

Fact of the Case:

The land owners purchased land claimed to be in possession since 1982. The State of Andhra Pradesh claimed the land as jagir land. The land owners challenged a notice issued by the Joint Collector, which was allowed by the Single Judge. The State Government filed an appeal.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the State Government's notice was issued without jurisdiction and after an unreasonable delay. It held that the question of title cannot be examined in a writ petition and emphasized the need for civil court adjudication in land ownership disputes.

Issues: Validity of the State Government's notice, jurisdiction of the State Government to determine land ownership, and the need for civil court adjudication in land ownership disputes.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized that the State Government cannot determine land ownership and that the question of title cannot be examined in a writ petition. It highlighted the need for civil court adjudication in land ownership disputes.

Final Decision: The writ appeal was dismissed, and the court concurred with the view taken by the learned Single Judge. The State Government's notice was held to be without jurisdiction and after an unreasonable delay.

JUDGMENT :

(Alok Aradhe, J.)

This intra court appeal emanates from an order dated 05.06.2009 by which the writ petition preferred by respondents No.1 to 6 (hereinafter referred to as, “the land owners”) has been allowed and the memo dated 21.06.2005 issued by the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District, has been quashed. In order to appreciate the challenge of the appellants to the impugned order passed by the learned Single Judge, relevant facts need mention which are stated infra.

2. The land owners had purchased the land bearing Survey Nos.122 to 126, 143 to 150, 152/A, 152/B, 153 and 154 admeasuring Acs.185.18 guntas situated at Sultanpally Village, Shamshabad Mandal, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as, “the subject land”) vide registered sale deeds in the year 1982 from the original pattadars, namely Syed Shabuddin and Syed Karar Hyder Hussain. The land owners claim to be in possession of the subject land and have been issued pattadar pass books and title deeds.

3. After abolition of the jagir and announcement of survey and settlement of the village, the kancha land was auctioned by the Tahsildar in the year 1950-51 for Rs.1000.00 in favour of one Sri Prabhu Lingam. An appeal was filed by the jagirdar before the Additional Collector which was allowed by an order dated 12.08.1950 and the auction was set aside. It was directed that the subject lands be recorded as patta lands in the name of the jagirdar. Against the aforesaid order, said Sri Prabhu Lingam preferred an appeal before the Board of Revenue. The Board of Revenue by an order dated 19.07.1951 allowed the appeal. The jagirdar filed a revision before the Minister for Revenue who by an order dated 18.11.1952 dismissed the revision and upheld the order passed by the Board of Revenue.

4. The commutation award was passed by the Jagir Administrator in the name of jagirdar Syed Shabuddin Hussain in Khata No.737 for an amount of Rs.60,000.00. A House Committee was constituted by the Legislative Assembly on 17.08.1987, to implement directions of the Board of Revenue.

5. The State of Andhra Pradesh claimed the subject land as jagir land as per the provisions of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) (Abolition of Jagirs) Regulation, 1358 Fasli (hereinafter referred to as, “the Jagir Regulation”). The Revenue Divisional Officer issued a memo on 21.06.1993 and held that the subject land is a jagir land and not a patta land.

6. The land owners challenged the validity of the aforesaid memo dated 21.06.1993 in a writ petition, namely W.P.No.12631 of 1993. The said writ petition was allowed by a learned Single Judge by an order dated 24.03.2000 primarily on the ground that the State Government could not have unilaterally decided the question of title of the subject land. Against the aforesaid order, the State Government filed an intra court appeal, namely W.A.No.732 of 2000.

7. A Division Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 11.11.2002 dismissed the aforesaid appeal preferred by the State Government and granted the liberty to it to approach the civil court or statutory forum for adjudication of the issue whether the subject land is a jagir land or a patta land.

8. Thereafter the Mandal Revenue Officer approached the Commissioner and Director of Settlement and Jagir Administrator with a prayer that the subject land should be declared as jagir land. The Commissioner and Director of Settlement and Jagir Administrator by an order dated 31.03.2005 dismissed the prayer made on behalf of the Mandal Revenue Officer.

9. However, the Joint Collector-I, Ranga Reddy District, issued a notice dated 21.06.2005 by which the land owners were informed that the case was taken up for hearing under Section 166-B of the Andhra Pradesh (Telangana Area) Land Revenue Act, 1317 Fasli (hereinafter referred to as, “the Land Revenue Act’) and Section 9 of the Andhra Pradesh Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 1971 (hereinafter referred to as, “the Pattadar Pass Books Act”), and s

              Click Here to Read the rest of this document
              1
              2
              3
              4
              5
              6
              7
              8
              9
              10
              11
              Judicial Analysis

              AI

              SupremeToday Portrait Ad
              supreme today icon
              logo-black

              An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

              Please visit our Training & Support
              Center or Contact Us for assistance

              qr

              Scan Me!

              India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

              For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

              whatsapp-icon Back to top