Back
M. LAXMAN
Ramesh Kumar Bung – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, Rep. by Station House Officer, Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad, through Public Prosecutor – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. firs registered against appellants showcase serious allegations of conspiracy and financial misconduct. (Para 2 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments on the legality of firs hinge on procedural compliance and merit of allegations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. the requirement of an affidavit in the application under section 156(3) is procedural. (Para 13 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. court determined the quashment of certain offenses while recognizing serious allegations remain. (Para 26 , 36) |
ORDER :
1. Since the issue involved in both the petitions is almost one and the same, they are being disposed of by way of this common order.
2. Crl.P.Nos.2370 and 2371 of 2021 are filed under Section 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure (for short ‘Cr.P.C’) by the petitioners/accused Nos.1 to 3 to quash proceedings in Crime Nos.218 and 222 of 2021 respectively on the file of Banjara Hills Police Station, Hyderabad. Crime No.218 of 2021 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477-A of the INDIAN PENAL CODE , 1870 (for short ‘IPC’) and Crime No.222 of 2021 was registered for the offences punishable under Sections 120-B, 409, 420, 467, 468, 471 and 477-A of
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
