A. SANTHOSH REDDY
Pratap Jungle Resorts Pvt. Ltd – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
Understood. Please provide the legal document content within
JUDGMENT
1. Since the issue involved in both the revisions is common and they also arise out of O.S.No.626 of 2019, they are heard together and disposed of by this common order.
2. C.R.P.No.911 of 2020 is directed against the order dtd. 17/3/2020 in I.A.No.2139 of 2019 in O.S.No.626 of 2019, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, wherein the said application filed by the petitioners herein (defendant Nos.6 to 9) under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') seeking rejection of plaint, was dismissed.
3. C.R.P.No.1004 of 2020 is directed against the order dtd. 17/3/2020 in I.A.No.2157 of 2019 in O.S.No.626 of 2019, on the file of the Principal District Judge, Ranga Reddy District, at L.B.Nagar, wherein the said application filed by the petitioner herein (defendant No.15) under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short 'CPC') seeking rejection of plaint, was dismissed.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the respondents in both the revisions. Perused the record.
5. Respondent Nos.1 to 5/plaintiffs filed the suit O.S.No.626 of 2019 filed a suit for declaration of
Chhotanben And Another V. Kiritbhai Jalkrushnabhai Thakkar
Dahiben V. Arvindbhai Kalyanji Bhanusali (Gajra) Dead Through Legal Representatives
Madanuri Sri Rama Chandra Murthy V. Syed Jalal
C.S.Ramaswamy V. V.K.Senthil And Others
Swamy Atmananda v. Sri Ramakrishna Tapovanam (2005) 10 SCC 51
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.