Back
K. SARATH
Kakati Karshak Industries Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana – Respondent
ORDER :
1. This Writ Petition is filed seeking a direction to the respondents to pay the compensation in respect of the lands of the petitioner-company to an extent of Ac.2.00 of land including Guva trees, a bore well, a room and fencing, covered by Sy.Nos.837/7, 837/8A, situated at Pamulaparthy Village of Wargal Mandal of Medak District, which was acquired by the respondents.
2. Heard the learned Counsel for the petitioner-company and the learned Government Pleader for Land Acquisition appearing for the respondents.
3. The learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner-company is the owner and possessor of land to an extent of Ac.43.00 Guntas in Sy. No. 837/7 and 837/A situated at Pamulaparthy Village, Wargal Mandal of Medak District having purchased the same through various registered sale deeds from the patta holders. After purchasing the same the name of the petitioner-company was mutated in the revenue records and pattadar pass books were also issued in the name of the petitioner-company to the said extents of lands in Katha bearing No. 136, vide Pass Book No. 664936.
4. The learned Counsel for the petitioner further submitted that the respondent authorities have p
The court established that proper notice and compensation are essential in land acquisition, reinforcing the rights of landholders under the Land Acquisition Act.
The acquisition proceedings under Award No.12/83 were held not to lapse in terms of Sec. 24(2) of the RFCTLARR Act and they will continue.
An argument to contrary blurs boundary lines of schemes of acquisition envisaged under these statutes and thus, runs counter to scope of section 28 of 1966 Act.
petitioners being agriculturists cannot be expected to remain quiet. When the purpose of acquiring their lands has remained dormant and that they are not being put to use for the purposes for which t....
No award under Section 11 of 1894 Act for specific land post Section 6 declaration causes lapse under Section 11A; mandates fresh acquisition under 2013 Act; delay/laches inapplicable, protects Artic....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
