Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
T.VINOD KUMAR
Sure Srinivasa Rao – Appellant
Versus
Station House Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners' concern for daughter's health. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. investigation into confinement and health status. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court orders medical admission and treatment. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 4. mother and child showed significant health recovery. (Para 9) |
| 5. medical reports indicate need for treatment and care. (Para 11) |
| 6. medical reports on delivery and condition of mother/baby. (Para 12 , 13) |
| 7. protective measures for family against threats. (Para 17 , 19 , 20) |
| 8. court directed protection and welfare measures for family. (Para 18) |
| 9. government intervention for welfare and safety. (Para 21 , 22) |
| 10. writ petition disposed with no costs. (Para 23 , 24) |
ORDER :
T. VINOD KUMAR, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed by the petitioners claiming themselves to be the parents of Smt.L.Pravalika, who is stated to have married one L.Venkata Chalapati Rao against their wishes and living with him; and that her husband – Sri L.Venkata Chalapati Rao is not providing their daughter necessary medical treatment and is not allowing her daughter to come out of the house by locking the premises whenever he is going out.
2. The petitioners by the present Writ Petition further claim that t
The court emphasized the balance between parental rights and individual autonomy, affirming the state's responsibility to ensure health and safety.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
