SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Telangana) 1764

IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
E.V. VENUGOPAL, J.
Sri Gollena Shyam Sunder – Appellant
Versus
The State of Telangana and 4 others – Respondent
Writ Petition No. 10304 of 2023
Decided On : 07-11-2025

Advocates:
Advocate Appeared:
For the Appellant : VENU CHEGGAM
For the Respondent: GP FOR REVENUE

The Court affirmed that failure to correct inaccurate land records constitutes a violation of natural justice and legal duty under the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020 - Writ petition filed for mandamus against respondent for not issuing E-Patta passbook - Action deemed illegal as it violated principles of natural justice and jurisdiction - Petitioner entitled to correction of records reflecting rightful ownership of ancestral land. (Paras 1, 3, 5)

(B) Administrative Law - Duty of authorities to ensure accuracy of land records and address errors - Rejection of application based on incorrect entries without verification found arbitrary. (Para 5)

(C) Fair Procedure - Obligation to conduct a hearing and notify affected parties before altering land records - The right to be heard is fundamental to just proceedings. (Para 5)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner sought to rectify land records after erroneous names were entered due to a technical error, despite being the lawful pattadar since 1988. The respondent’s rejection of his application for an E-Patta passbook was challenged as arbitrary.

Findings of Court:
It was determined that the petitioner’s ownership was established, and the action of the third respondent was illegal and unsustainable.

Issues: The main issues pertained to the jurisdiction of the respondents and the verification of entries on the Dharani portal.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that failure to correct inaccurate records and improper rejection without detailed inquiry was contrary to the principles of natural justice.

Result: Writ petition allowed, endorsement set aside.

Table of Content
1. declaration of illegal action regarding e-patta passbook. (Para 1)
2. argument about maintaining the correctness of land records. (Para 2 , 4)
3. petitioner's ancestral ownership and errors in records. (Para 3)
4. court's observations on arbitrary actions and verification necessity. (Para 5)
5. order for correction of land records and procedural fairness. (Para 6 , 7)

ORDER :

1. The present writ petition is filed by the petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief :

“… to issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of writ of mandamus declaring the action of the respondent No.3 in not issuing E-Patta pass book under Section 6 of Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020 in respect of petitioner's ancestral agricultural land an extent of Ac.2-26.80 Gts. in Survey No.142/1A/1/1 situated at Kothapet Revenue Village, Kaghaznagar Mandal of K.B. Asifabad District in pursuance of petitioner's online application for passbook data correction vide Application No. 2200044601 dated 13.06.2022 and offline representation dated 14.03.2023 as illegal, unjust, arbitrary, suffers from failure of exercising the jurisdiction vested in the respondent No.3 and violation of fundamental rights guaranteed to the petitioner under Article 14, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and consequently declare the action of the respondent No.3 in issuing the endorsement vide proceeding No.D2/TM33/2200044601/2023 dated 11.03.2023 by rejecting the petitioner's application is also illegal, arbitrary, against principles of natural justice and further set aside the same endorsement vide Proceeding No.D2/TM33/2200044601/2023 dated 11.03.2023 issued by the Respondent No. 3....”

2. Heard Sri Ramakrishna Kulkarni, learned counsel representing learned counsel for the petitioner Sri Venu Cheggam and Sri L.Ravinder, learned Assistant Government Pleader appearing on behalf of learned Government Pleader for Revenue Sri K.Muralidhar Reddy. Though notice is ordered, none appeared for the respondent No.6.

3. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the present writ petition has been filed seeking a declaration that the action of respondent No.3, in failing to record the petitioner’s name on the Dharani online portal and in not issuing an E-Patta passbook under Section 6 of the Telangana Rights in Land and Pattadar Pass Books Act, 2020, in respect of his ancestral agricultural land admeasuring Ac.2-26.80 Gts., in Survey No.142/1A/1/1, situated at Kothapet Revenue Village, Kaghaznagar Mandal, K.B. Asifabad District despite his online application for passbook data correction and subsequent offline representation dated 14.03.2023 is illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and violative of the principles of natural justice:

(a) The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that the endorsement issued by respondent No.3 vide proceedings No.D2/TM33/2200044601/2023 dated 11.03.2023, rejecting his application, be declared illegal and consequently set aside. During the Land Record Updation Programme (LRUP), the petitioner’s name was not uploaded on the Dharani portal for the aforesaid land. Instead, the name of one Smt.Parvathi Bayilani, W/o.Eshwar Das Bailani, was erroneously recorded in 2019-20 without any supporting documentary evidence, along with Survey No.139/5 under Khata No.100922, marked as Non-DS. Such wrongful entry, made without due verification, is contrary to the provisions of Revenue Law and violative of natural justice.

(b) Aggrieved by the said error, the petitioner submitted an online application No.2200044601 dated 13.06.2022 for passbook data correction. The Tahsildar, Kaghaznagar Mandal, after due verification, recommended the correction, confirming that the erroneous entry in Dharani was due to a technical error. Despite such confirmation, the District Collector, K.B. Asifabad District, vide Proceedings No.D2/TM33/2200044601/2023 dated 11.03.2023, rejec

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top