Back
SURYA PRAKASH KESARWANI, PRAKASH PADIA
State Of U. P. Through Secretary, Department Of Home (Police Section) – Appellant
Versus
Bhanu Pratap Rajput – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard Sri A.K. Rai, and Smt. Subhah Rathi, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsels and Sri P.K. Ganguli, learned Standing Counsel for the State-appellant and Sri Sanjeev Singh, learned counsel for petitioners-respondent.
2. All these Special Appeals have been preferred by the State-appellant challenging the orders dated 05.09.2018, 14.11.2019, 01.10.2019, 16.09.2019, 28.11.2019, 16.09.2019, 16.09.2019, 16.09.2019, 16.09.2019, 05.09.2018, 01.10.2019 & 25.11.2019 passed in Writ Petition No.14195 of 2018 (Bhanu Pratap Rajput Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.16840 of 2019 (Deepak Pal Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14514 of 2019 (Sumit Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14079 of 2019 (Bhanu Pratap Rajput Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.18772 of 2019 (Sri Shyam Singh Saroj Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14093 of 2019 (Sarvesh Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14100 of 2019 (Kapil Babu Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14084 of 2019 (Anuj Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition No.14005 of 2019 (Sunil Kumar Vs. State of U.P. and others), Writ Petition N
The court upheld the finality of height measurement and related recruitment procedures governed by regulations, dismissing claims for re-evaluation due to marginal discrepancies.
The judgment establishes the principle that candidates are entitled to accurate and fair physical assessments in recruitment processes, and that respondents must provide clear information on relaxati....
The court upheld the recruitment process's integrity, reaffirming that the medical examination procedures aligned with due process and disallowed the re-medical requests based on delayed objections b....
Height measurement for disqualification must adhere to rounding guidelines, ensuring fairness in candidate evaluation processes.
Medical examination by the Medical Board consisting of medical experts under Rule 15(g) cannot be said to be inferior to the physical standard test conducted by a team of non-experts.
Candidates must exhaust all available remedies within the recruitment process before seeking judicial intervention, and the findings of Medical Boards in recruitment processes are generally upheld un....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
