Back
IN THE HIGH COURT FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AT HYDERABAD
K.SARATH
G. Lalithamma – Appellant
Versus
State of Telangana, represented by its Principal Secretary, Stamps and Registration of Department – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. ownership and previous engagements concerning property. (Para 1 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. justification for property inclusion in prohibitory register. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. authority to challenge the status quo order. (Para 7 , 11) |
| 4. nature of the status quo order and implications on property rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. lack of prohibition order; directive to remove property from prohibited list. (Para 12) |
| 6. final judgment and implications for future property transactions. (Para 13) |
ORDER :
K.SARATH, J.
1. This Writ Petition is filed questioning the action of the respondent No.3 in including the property of the petitioner bearing Plot Nos.474 and 475, admeasuring to an extent of 546 sq.Yards in Sy.No.66/11, situated at Ward No.3, Block No.12, Rock Town, Mansoorabad Village, Saroornagar Revenue Mandal, under GHMC, L.B.Nagar Circle, Ranga Reddy District (hereinafter referred to as ‘subject property’) in the Prohibitory List maintained by the respondents as illegal and arbitrary and sought a direction to the respondent No.3 to delete the subject property from the Prohibitory List.
2. Heard Sri N.Krishna Sumanth, learned Counsel for the petitioner and Smt.S.Sravanthi, learned Assistant Gover
Inclusion of property in the prohibitory list without explicit court order against alienation is arbitrary and illegal; status quo does not imply prohibition on alienation.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
