WORKING JOURNALISTS AND OTHER NEWSPAPER EMPLOYEES (CONDITIONS OF SERVICE) AND MISCELLANEOUS PROVISIONS ACT, 1955
(1) This Act may be called the1[Working Journalists and other Newspaper Employees] (Conditions of Service) and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1955.
( 2 ) It extends to the whole of India2[* * *].
________________________
1. Substituted by Act 60 of 1974, section 2, for "Working Journalists" w.e.f. 21-12-1974.
2. The words "except the State of Jammu and Kashmir" omitted by Act 51 of 1970, section 2 and Schedule. w.e.f. 1-9-1971.
In this Act, unless the context otherwise requires,--
1 [(a)"Board" means--
(i) in relation to working journalists, the Wage Board constituted under section 9; and
(ii) in relation to non-journalist newspaper employees, the Wage Board constituted under section 13C;]
(b) "newspaper" means any printed periodical work containing public news or comments on public news and includes such other class of printed periodical work as may, from time to time, be notified in this behalf by the Central Government in the Official Gazette;
(c) "newspaper employee" means any working journalist, and includes any other person employed to do any work in, or in relation to, any newspaper establishment;
&n
(1) The provisions of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), as in force for the time being, shall, subject to the modification specified in sub-section (2), apply to, or in relation to, working journalists as they apply to, or in relation to, workmen within the meaning of that Act.
(2) Section 25F of the aforesaid Act, in its application to working journalists, shall be construed as if in clause (a) thereof, for the period of notice referred to therein in relation to the retrenchment of a workman, the following periods of notice in relation to the retrenchment of a working journalist had been substituted, namely:--
(a) six months, in the case of an editor, and
(b) three months, in the case of any other working journalist;
Where at any time between the 14th day of July, 1954, and the 12th day of March, 1955, any working journalist had been retrenched, he shall be entitled to receive from the employer--
(a) wages for one month at the rate to which he was entitled immediately before his retrenchment, unless he had been given one month's notice in writing before such retrenchment; and
(b) compensation which shall be equivalent to fifteen days' average pay for every completed year of service under that employer or any part thereof in excess of six months.
1 [5. Payment of gratuity
(1) Where--
(a) any working journalist has been in continuous service, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, for not less than three years in any newspaper establishment, and-
(i) his services are terminated by the employer in relation to that newspaper establishment for any reason whatsoever, otherwise than as a punishment inflicted by way of disciplinary action; or
(ii) he retires from service on reaching the age of superannuation; or
(b) any working journalist has been in continuous service, whether before or after the commencement of this Act, for not less than ten years in any newspaper establishment, and he voluntarily resigns on or after the 1st day of July
1 5A. Nomination by working journalist
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, or in any disposition, testamentary or otherwise in respect of any gratuity payable to a working journalist, where a nomination made in the prescribed manner purports to confer on any person the right to receive payment of the gratuity for the time being due to the working journalist, the nominee shall, on the death of the working journalist, become entitled to the gratuity and to be paid the sum due in respect thereof to the exclusion of all other persons, unless the nomination is varied or cancelled in the prescribed manner.
(2) Any nomination referred to in sub-section (1) shall become void if the nominee predeceases, or where there are two or more nominees, all the nominees predecease, the working journalist making th
(1) Subject to any rules that may be made under this Act, no working journalist shall be required or allowed to work in any newspaper establishment for more than one hundred and forty-four hours during any period of four consecutive weeks, exclusive of the time for meals.
(2) Every working journalist shall be allowed during any period of seven consecutive days rest for a period of not less than twenty-four consecutive hours, the period between 10 P.M. and 6 A.M. being included therein.
Explanation.--For the purposes of this section, "week" means a period of seven days beginning at mid-night on Saturday.
Without prejudice to such holidays, casual leave or other kinds of leave as may be prescribed, every working journalist shall be entitled to--
(a) earned leave on full wages for not less than one-eleventh of the period spent on duty;
(b) leave on medical certificate on one-half of the wages for not less than one-eighteenth of the period of service.
1 [8. Fixation or revision of rates of wages
(1) The Central Government may, in the manner hereinafter provided,--
(a) fix rates of wages in respect of working journalists;
(b) revise, from time to time, a! such intervals as it may think fit, the rates of wages fixed under this section or specified in the order made under section 6 of the Working Journalists (Fixation of Rates of Wages) Act, 1958 (29 of 1958).
(2) The rates of wages may be fixed or revised by the Central Government in respect of working journalists for time work and for piece work.
_______________________
1. Substituted by Act 65 of 1962, section 4, for sections 8 to 13 w.e.f. 15-1-1963.
1 [9.Procedure for fixing and revising rates of wages
For the purpose of fixing orrevising rates of wages in respect of working journalists under this Act, theCentral Government shall, as and when necessary, constitute a Wage Board whichshall consist of--
(a)2 [threepersons] representing employers in relation to newspaper establishments;
(b)2 [threepersons] representing working journalists;
(c)2 [fourindependent persons], one of whom shall be a person who is, or has been, aJudge of a High Court or the Supreme Court and who shall be appointed by thatGovernment as the Chairman thereof.
_______________________
1.Substituted by Act 65 of 1962, section 4, forsection
(1) The Board shall, by notice published in such manner as it thinks fit, call upon newspaper establishments and working journalists and other persons interested in the fixation or revision of rates of wages of working journalists to make such representations as they may think fit as respects the rates of wages which may be fixed or revised under this Act in respect of working journalists.
(2) Every such representation shall be in writing and shall be made within such period as the Board may specify in the notice and shall state the rates of wages which, in the opinion of the person making the representation, would be reasonable, having regard to the capacity of the employer to pay the same or to any other circumstance, whichever may seem relevant to the person making the representation in relation to his representation.
(3) The Board sh
(1) Subject to the provisions contained in sub-sec(ion (2), the Board may exercise all or any of the powers which an Industrial Tribunal constituted under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (14 of 1947), exercises for the adjudication of an industrial dispute referred to it and shall, subject to the provisions contained in this Act, and the rules, if any, made thereunder, have power to regulate its own procedure.
(2) Any representations made to the Board and any documents furnished to it by way of evidence shall be open to inspection on payment of such fee as may be prescribed, by any person interested in the matter.
(3) If, for any reason, a vacancy occurs in the office of Chairman or any other member of the Board, the Central Government shall fill the vacancy by appointing another person thereto in accordance with the provisions of sec
(1) As soon as may be, after the receipt of the recommendations of the Board, the Central Government shall make an order in terms of the recommendations or subject to such modifications, if any, as it thinks fit, being modifications which, in the opinion of the Central Government, do not effect important alterations in the character of the recommendations.
(2) Notwithstanding anything contained in sub-section (1), the Central Government may, if it thinks fit,--
(a) make such modifications in the recommendations, not being modifications of the nature referred to in sub-section (1), as it thinks fit:
Provided that before making any such modifications, the Central Government shall cause notice to be given to all persons likely to be affected thereby in such manner as may be prescribed, and shall
For the purpose of fixing or revising rates of wages inrespect of non-journalist newspaper employees under this Act, the CentralGovernment shall, as and when necessary, constitute a Wage Boardwhich shall consist of--
(a)1 [threepersons] representing employers in relation to newspaper establishments;
(b)1 [threepersons] representing non-journalist newspaper employees; and
(c)1 [fourindependent persons], one of whom shall be a person who is, or has been, a Judgeof a High Court or the Supreme Court and who shall be appointed by thatGovernment as the Chairman thereof.
_______________________
1.Substituted by Act 34 of 1996, section 3 w.e.f. 28-9-1996.
Legal Comments
"Section 13(c) - Inclusive Definition" - Section 2(f) and inclusive clause include correspondents; part-time status permitted provided principal avocation remains journalism - [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190]
"Principal Avocation Test" - To be a working journalist, the person must have journalism as his principal avocation and be employed as such; the onus lies on the claimant to prove principal avocation and employment status - [B. Somayajulu VS State OF A. P. , Hyderabad - 1961 0 Supreme(AP) 46]
"Commission of Inquiry Context" - Majithia Wage Board recommendations implemented under Section 12; Section 17(2) references and compatibility with ID Act are central to recovery mechanisms - [Head of Human Resource Dainik Bhaskar Group VS Dinesh Devidas Pardeshi - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1588]
"Concurrent Remedies" - Section 17(1) preserves other modes of recovery; Section 33-C/ID Act claims can coexist with WJ Act remedies; no exclusive bar - [BUSINESS MANAGER, ANDHRA PRINTERS LTD. VS INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT - Andhra Pradesh (1992)]
"Corresponder Included in Definition" - Expressly included in Section 2(f) as within “working journalist,” even when part-time; ensures coverage for correspondents - [B. Somayajulu VS State OF A. P. , Hyderabad - 1961 0 Supreme(AP) 46], [02100011737]
"Employer-Employee Relationship Burden" - Courts require proof of master-servant relationship; status as working journalist does not by itself establish employer status; burden on claimant to prove relationship - [00200049144]
"Exclusive Employment Principle" - Pre-amendment law required exclusive employment for part-timers under some cases; post-1981 amendment clarified part-timers may be covered if principal avocation test met - [PRABHAKAR SHANKAR KULKARNI VS JAYANTRAO TILAK - 1987 0 Supreme(Bom) 446]
"Retroactivity and Vires" - The Act and Majithia Wage Board framework upheld as intra vires; constitutional challenges to vires rejected; beneficial legislation for journalism - [ABP Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2014 1 Supreme 417], [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190]
"Part-Time Proofreaders" - Proofreaders deemed working journalists under 2(f) and entitled to hours of work; but tribunal findings require proper evidence of actual journalist work; court remands where necessary - [HINDU VS THEIR WORKERS (MADRAS UNION OF JOURNALISTS) - Madras (1957)], [L. D. JAIN VS GENERAL MANAGER GOVT. OF INDIA PRESS, NEW DELHI - 1966 0 Supreme(Del) 41]
"Scheme as Complete Code" - Express Newspapers lineage: Act operates as a complete framework for wages, gratuity, hours, etc., with ID Act integrated via Section 3; Wage Board functions akin to a quasi-judicial body but within statute - [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190], [Workmen Of Sadakt (Represented By Bihar Working Journalists Union) VS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 164], [R. Varadachari VS The Management of the Press Trust of India & Others - 2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 170]
"Calligraphists Katibs case" - Palekar/Bihar Patna decisions: inclusion of calligraphists as working journalists requires proving principal avocation and journalist-like work; mere handwriting not enough - [Workmen Of Sadakt (Represented By Bihar Working Journalists Union) VS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 164], [0040007210?] (reliable reference: 1980s Patna/Patna material)
"Revenue Recovery and Section 17" - Section 17 contemplates recovery after determination; not a forum for initial determination of amount due; reference to Labour Court for adjudication is required - [Mathrubhumi Printing & Publishing VS P. Rajan - 2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 464], [R. Varadachari VS The Management of the Press Trust of India & Others - 2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 170]
"Branch Office Jurisdiction" - Section 17(2) reference to Labour Court must consider jurisdictional premises (central/branch office location); failure to prove branch office affects references; remand/set aside where improper - [01300033980], [Living Media India Limited VS Deputy Labour Commissioner - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1689]
"Judicial Review of Wage Board Decisions" - Courts defer to specialized Wage Boards; independence and credibility of Board not undermined by perceived bias; finance capacity questions are for Board/Executive, not free of challenge - [Nav Bharat and M. P. Chronicle Group of Newspapers VS Krishna Sharan Shrivastava - 1988 0 Supreme(MP) 46], [Head of Human Resource Dainik Bhaskar Group VS Dinesh Devidas Pardeshi - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1588]
"Industrial Disputes Act Convergence" - Section 3(1) of Act extends ID Act to working journalists with specified modifications; 2(f) principal avocation and 2(c) newspaper employee interplay define status and remedies - [AVISHEK RAJA VS SANJAY GUPTA - 2017 5 Supreme 179], [All India Reporter VS State of Maharashtra - 1983 0 Supreme(Bom) 126]
"Proof of Employment Exclusivity" - For part-time journalists, exclusivity obligations and retainer-type arrangements scrutinized; the petitioner’s broader engagement may defeat status unless principal avocation remains journalism - [PRABHAKAR SHANKAR KULKARNI VS JAYANTRAO TILAK - 1987 0 Supreme(Bom) 446], [Navakesart Prakashan LTD. VS Employees State Insurance Corporation - 1984 0 Supreme(SC) 297]
"Arrears and Recovery Frameworks" - Section 17(1) permits recovery of money due; Section 17(2) permits reference to Labour Court for adjudication of disputed amounts; discerns between recoverability and entitlement - [Living Media India Limited VS Deputy Labour Commissioner - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1689], [KESHAVLAL M. RAO VS STATE - 1992 0 Supreme(Guj) 190]
"Judicial Stance on 'Newspaper Establishment'" - Definition of 'newspaper establishment' expansive; law reports not newspapers; ensuring only genuine newspaper establishments fall within Act coverage - [All India Reporter VS State of Maharashtra - 1983 0 Supreme(Bom) 126], [Navakesart Prakashan LTD. VS Employees State Insurance Corporation - 1984 0 Supreme(SC) 297]
"Notifications under Section 12" - Central Government notifications (Majithia Wage Board) are not ultra vires; challenge to notifications dismissed; due process preserved in wage-fixation scheme - [General Secretary New Indian Express Employees' Association VS New Indian Express - 2014 0 Supreme(Ker) 540], [ABP Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2014 1 Supreme 417]
"Interplay with Non-Journalist Employees" - Post-1974 amendments extended Act to non-journalist employees; wage Board mechanism tuned for both journalist and non-journalist sets, with common Board structure and independence safeguards - [Head of Human Resource Dainik Bhaskar Group VS Dinesh Devidas Pardeshi - 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 1588], [Bijay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Mohan Singh VS The State Of Bihar - 2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 20]
"Gratuity Conflicts" - Working journalists have gratuity provisions distinct from Payment of Gratuity Act; Section 5 provides special gratuity rules; conflicts with later gratuity regimes resolved by recognizing Act as a special statute for journalists - [P. RAJAN SANDHI VS UNION OF INDIA - 2010 0 Supreme(SC) 890], [Jagran Prakashan Limited VS Amar Kumar Singh - 2023 0 Supreme(All) 926]
"Proof of Principal Avocation in Corollary Cases" - In cases like Express Newspapers and Somayajulu lineage, the requirement to prove principal avocation remains central even where correspondents fall under inclusive clauses - [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190], [B. Somayajulu VS State OF A. P. , Hyderabad - 1961 0 Supreme(AP) 46]
"Remedies for Retrenchment and Reinstatement" - Board-based wage fixation interacts with ID Act retrenchment provisions; courts uphold reinstatement where appropriate and view contractual and managerial discretion with caution - [00100058727], [Vipin Kumar VS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal-cum-Labour Court - Punjab and Haryana (2014)]
Note: The above points synthesize the Act, Section 13(c) context (as reflected through Section 17 references and related jurisprudence) with emphasis on Section 2(f) definitions, principal avocation, inclusive vs exclusive interpretations, and the concurrent remedial framework. References are provided in square brackets after each bullet item.
The provisions of sections 10 to 13 A shall apply to, and in relation to, the Board constituted under section 13C, the Central Government and non-journalist newspaper employees, subject to the modifications that--
(a) the references to the Board and working journalist therein, wherever they occur, shall be construed respectively as references to the Board constituted under section 13 C and to non-journalist, newspaper employees;
(b) the references in sub-section (3) of section 11 to section 9 shall be construed as a reference to section 13 C; and
(c) the references in section 13 and section 13A to section 12 shall be construed as references to section 12 read with this section.]
1 [13DD. Constitution of Tribunal for fixing or revising rates of wages in respect ofnon-journalist newspaper employees
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act,where the Central Government is of opinion that the Boardconstituted under section 13C for the purpose of fixing or revising rates ofwages in respect of non-journalist newspaper employees under this Act has notbeen able to function (for any reason whatsoever) effectively, and in thecircumstances, it is necessary so to do, it may, by notification in the OfficialGazette, constitute a Tribunal, which shall consist of a person who is, or hasbeen, a Judge of a High Court or the Supreme Court, for the purpose of fixing orrevising rates of wages in respect of non-journalist newspaper employees underthis Act.
(2)The provisions of sections 10 to 13A shall apply to, and inrelatio
(1) The Central Government may, in the manner hereinafter provided,--
(a) fix rates of wages in respect of non-journalist newspaper employees; and
(b) revise, from time to time, at such intervals as it may think fit, the rates of wages fixed under this section.
(2) The rates of wages may be fixed or revised by the Central Government in respect of non-journalist newspaper employees for time work and for piece work.
1 [13AA.Constitution of Tribunal for fixing or revising rates of wages in respect ofworking journalists
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act,where the Central Government is of opinion that the Boardconstituted under section 9 for the purpose of fixing or revising rates ofwages in respect of working journalists under this Act has not been able tofunction (for any reason whatsoever) effectively, and in the circumstances, itis necessary so to do, it may, by notification in the Official Gazette,constitute a Tribunal, which shall consist of a person who is, or has been, aJudge of a High Court or the Supreme Court, for the purpose of fixing orrevising rates of wages in respect of working journalists under this Act.
(2) The provisions of sections 10 to 13A shallapply to, and in relation to, the Tribunal constituted under sub-secti
On the coming into operation of an order of the Central Government under section 12, every working journalist shall be entitled to be paid by his employer wages at the rate which shall in no case be less than the rate of wages specified in the order.
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in this Act, where the Central Government is of opinion that it is necessary so to do, it may, after consultation with the Board, by notification in the Official Gazette, fix interim rates of wages in respect of working journalists.
(2) Any interim rates of wages so fixed shall be binding on all employers in relation to newspaper establishments and every working journalist shall be entitled to be paid wages at a rate which shall, in no case, be less than the interim rates of wages fixed under subsection (1).
(3) Any interim rates of wages fixed under sub-section (1) shall remain in force until the order of the Central Government under section 12 comes into operation.]
Legal Comments
"Scope of Act" - The Act applies to Working Journalists and certain Newspaper Employees; Section 2(f) defines "Working Journalist" with an inclusive structure that includes correspondents, editors, copy-tasters, etc., ensuring coverage extends beyond strictly full-time journalists - [Management Of Express News Papers VS B. Somayajulu - 1963 0 Supreme(SC) 127]
"Principal Avocation" - A key test under Section 2(f) is whether journalism is the individual's principal avocation; part-time status does not automatically exclude coverage if journalism is the principal occupation and employment as such is established - [Management Of Express News Papers VS B. Somayajulu - 1963 0 Supreme(SC) 127]
"Inclusive Clause" - The definition of "Working Journalist" includes explicit enumerations (e.g., correspondent) in the inclusive part, indicating the legislature intended to extend coverage beyond those who meet the traditional first limb – the inclusive clause is not merely ceremonial - [B. Somayajulu VS State OF A. P. , Hyderabad - 1961 0 Supreme(AP) 46], [PRABHAKAR SHANKAR KULKARNI VS JAYANTRAO TILAK - 1987 0 Supreme(Bom) 446]
"Employment Exclusivity" - Historically, exclusivity was a consideration for part-time correspondents; after amendments (1981), part-time journalists are covered, but exclusive employment remains a practical indicator in many cases; absence of exclusivity can complicate status claims - [PRABHAKAR SHANKAR KULKARNI VS JAYANTRAO TILAK - 1987 0 Supreme(Bom) 446], [All India Reporter VS State of Maharashtra - 1983 0 Supreme(Bom) 126]
"Constitutional Veto on Vires" - The Supreme Court has repeatedly held the Act to be intra vires and a valid special code for the press, affirming that Working Journalists constitute a special class deserving tailored protections, not violative of Articles 14, 19(1)(a), or (g) - Express Newspapers (Pvt) Ltd. v. Union of India; 1958 SCC decisions; related summaries - [ABP Pvt. Ltd. VS Union of India - 2014 1 Supreme 417], [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190], [R. Varadachari VS The Management of the Press Trust of India & Others - 2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 170]
"Concurrent Remedies" - Section 17 provides a mechanism to recover money due and also preserves concurrent remedies with the Industrial Disputes Act (Section 3 application, and Section 33-C parity); Section 17(1) states recovery is without prejudice to other modes of recovery; Section 17(2) permits reference to Labour Court; courts have treated these as concurrent pathways - [Statesman Mazdoor Union VS Union of India Through Secretary (Labour) - 2018 0 Supreme(Del) 1641], [BUSINESS MANAGER, ANDHRA PRINTERS LTD. VS INDUSTRIAL TRIBUNAL-CUM-LABOUR COURT - Andhra Pradesh (1992)]
"Wage Board framework" - Section 9 and 13-C, with Section 12, establish Wage Boards and Government enforcement for wage fixation/revision for working journalists and non-journalist journalists; Majithia Wage Board recommendations and their implementation are subject to Central Government notification; non-interference with wage board independence is recognized - [Bijay Kumar Singh Son of Sri Mohan Singh VS The State Of Bihar - 2023 0 Supreme(Pat) 20], [ANANDA BAZAR PATRIKA LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 1988 0 Supreme(Cal) 161], [Living Media India Limited VS Deputy Labour Commissioner - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1689]
"Interim Wages" - Section 13(A) empowers fixing interim wages; tribunals/central notifications can set interim rates, subject to ongoing consideration of final Wage Board Awards - [ANANDA BAZAR PATRIKA LTD. VS UNION OF INDIA (UOI) - 1988 0 Supreme(Cal) 161]
"Burden of Proof" - In adjudications on status, the burden remains on the claimant to prove being a journalist and that journalism is their principal avocation; tribunals must evaluate evidence on principal avocation, hours, and the nature of duties; misapplication may lead to remand or denial - [B. Somayajulu VS State OF A. P. , Hyderabad - 1961 0 Supreme(AP) 46], [DILLIP CHAWDA VS PRESIDING OFFICER, LABOUR COURT, JAIPUR. - 2005 0 Supreme(Ori) 36]
"Katibs/Calligraphists — Special Category" - Palekar/Bachawat/Majithia-era awards recognized specialized categories (e.g., calligraphists) within the broader working journalist framework; determining whether katibs constitute calligraphists requires evidence that they perform journalistic functions and engage in editorial work; mere handwriting is insufficient - [Workmen Of Sadakt (Represented By Bihar Working Journalists Union) VS Presiding Officer, Industrial Tribunal - 1998 0 Supreme(Pat) 164], [Sandeep Nagar VS Presiding Officer, Labour Court - 2021 0 Supreme(All) 971]
"Non-newspaper establishments" - The Act applies to newspaper establishments; law reports publishers, printers, and non-newspaper publishers may not fall within its definition of "newspaper establishment" or "newspaper" unless explicitly notified; thus applicability can be jurisdictionally contested - [All India Reporter VS State of Maharashtra - 1983 0 Supreme(Bom) 126]
"Gratuity and Other Benefits" - The Act provides gratuity protections specific to working journalists; it has been held that gratuity under the Working Journalists Act may be forfeited for certain disciplinary terminations, balancing with separate gratuity regimes under the Payment of Gratuity Act; the two statutes serve different purposes and are not always interchangeable - [AVISHEK RAJA VS SANJAY GUPTA - 2017 5 Supreme 179], [Mathrubhumi Printing & Publishing VS P. Rajan - 2005 0 Supreme(Ker) 464]
"Arrears and Recovery Procedure" - When a dispute concerns arrears under Majithia Wage Board, the authority must determine the liability and amount due before invoking Section 17; Section 17 is for recovery once the amount is determined; improper initiation of Section 17 proceedings or lack of jurisdiction can be grounds for quashing awards - [Living Media India Limited VS Deputy Labour Commissioner - 2019 0 Supreme(Del) 1689], [KESHAVLAL M. RAO VS STATE - 1992 0 Supreme(Guj) 190]
"Remedial emphasis" - The jurisprudence consistently treats the Working Journalists Act as a beneficial, protective framework tailored to the press; courts show deference to Wage Board mechanisms and to the centralization of rates/benefits through government action - [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190], [HINDU VS THEIR WORKERS (MADRAS UNION OF JOURNALISTS) - Madras (1957)]
"Legacy and Amendments" - Amendments (e.g., 1981, 1974) broadened coverage to part-time journalists and non-journalist employees; the Act has evolved as a specialized social welfare instrument within the broader industrial relations landscape - [PRABHAKAR SHANKAR KULKARNI VS JAYANTRAO TILAK - 1987 0 Supreme(Bom) 446], [General Manager, Thina Boomi News Paper,9, Dindigul Main Road, Vilankudi, Madurai-16 VS Appellate Authority Under The Payment Of Gratuity Act, 1972, And Deputy Chief Labor Commissioner (Central) Shastri Bhavan, Chennai 600 008, The Assistant Labor Commissioner (Central), New No. 5, Old No. 1-A (Ii Floor) Lady Doak College Road, Chinnnachokki - 2011 0 Supreme(Mad) 4897]
"Exclusionary Boundaries" - The Act excludes certain managerial or high-level administrative roles from "working journalist" status; courts assess whether an individual’s duties primarily involve managerial functions to determine inclusion or exclusion - [S. N. Sahi VS Vishwanath Lal - 1959 0 Supreme(Pat) 67], [R. Varadachari VS The Management of the Press Trust of India & Others - 2003 0 Supreme(Mad) 170]
"Remedies for Termination" - Where termination occurs, Labour Courts and Wage Board processes interact with constitutional protections; in some cases, reinstatement with back wages is ordered where termination is illegal, subject to proof of principal avocation and status - [L. D. JAIN VS GENERAL MANAGER GOVT. OF INDIA PRESS, NEW DELHI - 1966 0 Supreme(Del) 41], [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190]
"Evidence Standards" - In status determinations, the tribunal must consider all materials on record; remands or judgments often call for fresh consideration where materials were not properly weighed - [Dillip Chawda VS Presiding Officer, Labour Court, Jeypore - 2005 0 Supreme(Ori) 39]
"Judicial Trend Summary" - The corpus of jurisprudence consistently upholds the Act as a constitutional, valid, and remedial framework with a specialized wage and employment regime for working journalists, while clarifying scope, definitions, and the interplay with general labour law - [Express Publication (Madurai) LTD. VS Union Of India - 2004 3 Supreme 190], [HINDU VS THEIR WORKERS (MADRAS UNION OF JOURNALISTS) - Madras (1957)], [Andhra Printers Limited, Hyderabad VS Industrial Tribunal-Cum-Labour Court - 1992 0 Supreme(AP) 378]
The provisions of the Industrial Employment (Standing Orders) Act, 1946, as in force for the time being, shall apply to every newspaper establishment wherein twenty or more newspaper employes are employed or were employed on any day of the preceding twelve months as if such newspaper establishment were an industrial establishment to which the aforesaid Act has been applied by a notification under sub-section (3) of section 1 thereof, and as if a newspaper employee were a workman within the meaning of that Act.
The Employees' Provident Funds Act, 19521 , as in force for the time being, shall apply to every newspaper establishmentin which twenty or more persons are employed on any day, as if such newspaperestablishment were a factory to which the aforesaid Act had been applied by anotification of the Central Government under sub-section (3) of section 1thereof, and as if a newspaper employee were an employee within the meaning ofthat Act.
________________________
1.Now the Employees' Provident Funds andMiscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952.
1 [16A. Employer not to dismiss, discharge, etc., newspaper employees
No employer in relation to a newspaper establishment shall, by reason of his liability for payment of wages to newspaper employees at the rates specified in an order of the Central Government under section 12, or under section 12 read with section 13 AA or section 13 DD, dismiss, discharge or retrench any newspaper employee.]
_________________________
1.Inserted by Act 36 of 1981, section 3 w.e.f. 13-8-1980.
(1) The provisions of this Act shall have effect notwithstanding anything inconsistent therewith contained in any other law or in the term of any award, agreement or contract of service, whether made before or after the commencement of this Act:
Provided that where under any such award, agreement, contract of service or otherwise, a newspaper employee is entitled to benefits in respect of any matter which are more favourable to him than those to which he would be entitled under this Act, the newspaper employee shall continue to be entitled to the more favourable benefits in respect of that mater, notwithstanding that he receives benefits in respect of other matters under this Act.
(2) Nothing contained in this Act shall be construed to preclude any newspaper employee from entering into an agreement with an employer for granting him rig
Every employer in relation to a newspaper establishment shall prepare and maintain such registers, records and muster-rolls and in such manner as may be prescribed.
(1) The State Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, appoint such persons as it thinks fit to be Inspectors for the purposes of this Act and may define the local limits within which they shall exercise their functions.
(2) Any Inspector appointed under sub-section (1) may for the purpose of ascertaining whether any of the provisions of this Act or of the Working Journalists (Fixation of Rates of Wages) Act, 1958 (29 of 1958), have been complied with in respect of a newspaper establishment--
(a) require an employer to furnish such information as he may consider necessary;
(b) at any reasonable time enter any newspaper establishment or any premises connected therewith and require any one found in charge thereof to produce before him for examination any accounts, books, regis
1[17. Recovery of money due from an employer
(1) Where any amount is due under this Act to a newspaper employee from an employer, the newspaper employee himself, or any person authorized by him in writing in this behalf, or in the case of the death of the employee, any member of his family may, without prejudice to any other mode of recovery, make an application to the State Government for the recovery of the amount due to him, and if the State Government, or such authority, as the State Government may specify in this behalf, is satisfied that any amount is so due, it shall issue a certificate for that amount to the Collector, and the Collector shall proceed to recover that amount in the same manner as an arrear of land revenue.
(2) If any question arises as to the amount due under this Act to a newspaper employee from his employer, the
1[(1) If any employer contravenes any of the provisions of this Act or any rule or order made thereunder, he shall be punishable with fine which may extend to two hundred rupees.
(1A) Whoever, having been convicted of any offence under this Act, is again convicted of an offence involving the contravention of the same provision, shall be punishable with fine which may extend to five hundred rupees.
(1B) Where an offence has been committed by a company, every person who, at the time the offence was committed, was in charge of, and was responsible to, the company for the conduct of the business of the company, as well as the company, shall be deemed to be guilty of the offence and shall be liable to be proceeded against and punished accordingly:Provided that nothing contained in this sub-section shall render any such person liable to any
No suit, prosecution or other legal proceeding shall lie against the Chairman or any other member of the Board1[or the person constituting the Tribunal]2[or an Inspector appointed under this Act] for anything which is in good faith done or intended to be done.
_________________________
1. Inserted by Act 6 of 1976, section 5 w.e.f. 31-1-1979.
2. Inserted by Act 65 of 1962, section 7 w.e.f. 15-1-1963.
Nothing in this Act or the Working Journalists (Fixation of Rates of Wages) Act. 1958 (29 of 1958), shall apply to 1 [any newspaper employee] who is an employee of the Government to whom the Fundamental and Supplementary Rules, Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, Civil Services (Temporary Service) Rules, Revised Leave Rules, Civil Service Regulations, Civilians in Defence Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules or the Indian Railway Establishment Code or any other rules or regulations that may be notified in this behalf by the Central Government in the Official Gazette, apply.]
________________________
1.Substituted by Act 60 of 1974, section 5, for "any workingjournalist" w.e.f. 21-12-1974.
1[19A. Defects in appointments not to invalidate acts
No act or proceeding of the Board shall be questioned on the ground merely of the existence of any vacancy in, or defect in the constitution of, the Board.
________________________
1. Inserted by Act 65 of 1962, section 8 w.e.f. 15-1-1963.
(1) The Central Government may, by notification in the Official Gazette, make rules to carry out the purposes of this Act.
(2) In particular and without prejudice to the generality of the foregoing power, such rules may provide for all or any of the following matters, namely:--
(a) payment of gratuity to working journalists;
(b) hours of work of working journalists;
(c) holidays, earned leave, leave on medical certificate, casual leave or any other kind of leave admissible to working journalists;
1 [(d) the procedure to be followed by the Board 2 [or, as the case may be, the Tribunal,] in the discharge of its functions under this Act;
(e) the form of nominati
[Repealed by the Repealing and Amending Act. 1960 (58 of 1960), section 2 and Sch. I]
1 [THESCHEDULE
[Seesection 2 (d)]
1.For the purposes of clause (d) of section 2,--
(1)two of more newspaper establishments under common control shall be deemed to beone newspaper establishment;
(2)two or more newspaper establishments owned by an individual and his or herspouse shall be deemed to be one newspaper establishment unless it is shown thatsuch spouse is a sole proprietor or partner or a shareholder of a corporate bodyon the basis of his or her own individual funds;
(3)two or more newspaper establishments publishing newspapers bearing the same or
similartitle and in the same language in any place in India or bearing the same orsimilar title but in dif
Elevate your legal practice with advanced AI-driven research and drafting solutions. Experience unmatched efficiency, precision, and security, tailored exclusively for legal professionals.