State of Karnataka – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
Judgement
BEG, C.J.I. :- "India, that is Bharat, shall be a Union of States." The very first mandate of the first Article of our Constitution to which we owe allegiance thus prohibits, by necessary implication, according to the plaintiff in the original suit now before us under Art. 131 of the Constitution of India, any constitutionally unjustifiable trespass by the Union Government upto the domain of the powers of the States. The State of Karnataka, has therefore, sued for a declaration that a notification dated 23-5-1977 (hereinafter referred to as the Central Notification) constituting a Commission of Inquiry in purported exercise of its powers under
Section 3 of the Commissions of Inquiry Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), is illegal asd ultra vires. This declaration is sought on one of two alternative grounds: firstly, that the Commissions of inquiry Act, 1952, does not "authorise the Central Government to constitute a Commission of Inquiry in regard to matters falling exclusively within the sphere of the States legislative and executive power"; and, secondly, that if the provisions of the Act do cover the Central Govt. Notification, they are ultra vires for contrav
followed : State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
considered : State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
referred to : State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
dissented from : Observations of Chandrachud,J. in State of Rajasthan v. Union of India
A. Sanjeeni Naidu v. State of Madras
Kesavananda Bharati v. State of Kerala
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar
A. Sanjeevi Naidu v. State of Madras
Kathi Raning Rawat v. State of Saurashtra
State of Jammu and Kashmir v. Bakshi Ghulam Mohammad
Brajanandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narain
relied on : Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
Virendra Singh v. State of U. P.
followed : P. V. Jagannatha Rao v. State of orissa
Krishna Ballabh Sahay v. Commission of Enquiry
followed : Brajnandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narain
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar
relied on : KesavanandaBharati v. State of Kerala
Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
referred to : State of W. B. v. Union of India
Brajnandan Sinha v. Jyoti Narain
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S.R. Tendolkar
P. V. Jagannath Rao v. State of orissa
Krishna Ballabh Sahay v. Commission of Inquiry
Shri Ram Krishna Dalmia v. Shri Justice S. R. Tendolkar
referred to and explained : State of West Bengal v. Nripendra Nath Bagchi
Shamsher Singh v. State of Punjab
followed : Smt. Indira Nehru Gandhi v. Raj Narain
referred to and explained : Observations of Sikri, C. J. in Union of India v. H. S. Dhillon
referred to : A. K. Gopalan v. State of Madras
State of Bihar v. Kameshwar Singh
I. C. Golaknath v. State of Punjab
K. K. Kochuni v. State of Madras and Kerala
State of M. P. v. Ranojirao Shinde
Prem Chand Garg v. Excise Commissioner, U.P.
Sakal Papers Ltd. v. Union of India
Jagannath Baksh Singh v. State of U. P.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.