JAGDISH SINGH KHEHAR, C.NAGAPPAN
State of H. P. – Appellant
Versus
Rajesh Chander Sood etc. etc. – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.
1. The State of Himachal Pradesh came to be created, with effect from 25.1.1971. Consequent upon the creation of the State of Himachal Pradesh, employees engaged by the corporate sector, on their retirement, were being paid provident fund, under the provisions of the Employees’ Provident Funds and Miscellaneous Provisions Act, 1952 (hereinafter referred to as the Provident Fund Act). The Central Government framed the Employees’ Provident Funds Scheme, 1995, whereby, it replaced the earlier statutory schemes, framed under the Provident Fund Act. This scheme was adopted for the corporate sector employees, engaged in the State of Himachal Pradesh.
2. In order to extend better retiral benefits to these employees, the Himachal Pradesh Government framed another scheme on 29.10.1999 – the Himachal Pradesh Corporate Sector Employees Pension (Family Pension, Commutation of Pension and Gratuity) Scheme, 1999. In the present judgment, the instant scheme will be referred to as ‘the 1999 Scheme’. A perusal of ‘the 1999 Scheme’ reveals that its application extended to employees of some of the corporate bodies (- specified in Annexure-I, appended to ‘the 199
State of Punjab v. Amar Nath Goyal
Officers & Supervisors of I.D.P.L. v. Chairman & M.D., I.D.P.L.
BALCO Employees’ Union v. Union of India
M. Ramanatha Pillai v. State of Kerala
Excise Commissioner, U.P., Allahabad v. Ram Kumar
Union of India v. Godfrey Philips India Ltd.
Commissioner of Income-tax, Kerala and Coimbatore v. L.W. Russel
Krishena Kumar v. Union of India
State of West Bengal v. Ratan Behari Dey
State of Rajasthan v. Amrit Lal Gandhi
Howrah Municipal Corporation v. Ganges Rope Co. Ltd.
Union of India v. R. Sarangapani
U.P. Raghavendra Acharya v. State of Karnataka
Chairman, Railway Board v. C.R. Rangadhamaiah
Asger Ibrahim Amin v. Life Insurance Corporation of India
State of Madhya Pradesh v. Yogendra Shrivastava
State of Jharkhand v. Jitendra Kumar Srivastava
Union of India v. SPS Vains (Retd.)
Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, Patiala v. Mangal Singh
State of Assam v. Barak Upatyaka D.U. Karmachari Sanstha
M/s. Bhagwati Vanaspati Traders v. Senior Superintendent of Post Offices, Meerut
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.