IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
V.M.VELUMANI, V.LAKSHMINARAYANAN, JJ.
J.Amsaveni – Appellant
Versus
The State of Tamil Nadu – Respondent
W.P.No.26673 of 2017 and W.M.P.No.28404 of 2017
Decided on : 24-04-2023
WATER CATCHMENT AREA - TAMIL NADU TOWN AND COUNTRY PLANNING ACT, 1971 - [26, 27, 38]
Fact of the Case:
The petitioner sought to release lands classified as water catchment area for development. The respondents had classified the areas as a water catchment area for Red Hills Lake and declared it as a 'no development zone' under the Master Plan for Chennai. The petitioner claimed that the lands should be reclassified as urban use zone within stipulated timeframe.
Finding of the Court:
The court found that the lands were rightfully classified as water catchment areas to protect the environment and water sources. The court held that the petitioner's right to property was restricted, not taken away, and balanced the public interest for maintenance of the catchment area and the petitioner's right to utilize the property for agricultural and allied purposes. The court dismissed the writ petition.
Issues: The issues involved the classification of lands as water catchment areas, the restriction on development in these areas, and the petitioner's claim for reclassification of the lands as urban use zone.
Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the State had the power to regulate the manner in which an area is to be developed and that the petitioner's right to develop the land was restricted, not taken away. The court also emphasized the duty of the State and its entities to protect the environment and water sources.
Final Decision: The writ petition was dismissed, and no order as to costs was given. The court declined to give a direction for the consideration of the petitioner's representation, as it would be contrary to the statute.
ORDER :
V. LAKSHMINARAYANAN, J.
Prayer: Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, to issue a writ of Certiorarified Mandamus, to call for the records of the 2nd respondent Letter No.C1/10267/2017 dated 19.09.2017 and quash the same by directing the Respondents herein to release the lands belonging to the Petitioner herein situated at Thiruvallur District, Ambattur Taluk, Morai Village, S.No.370/4, measuring an extent of Ac 4.11 in Patta No.415 and in S.No.370/2, measuring an extent of Ac 1.90 in Patta. No.3293 and in Vellanur Village, S.No.1, measuring an extent of Ac 4.00 in Patta No.344 from being reserved as catchment area and reclassify the same as Urban use Zone within stipulated timeframe, thereby enabling me to proceed with any development activity in the above mentioned lands without any restriction pertaining to catchment area.
English translation:
When water fails, functions of nature cease, you say; Thus when rain fails, no men can walk in 'duty's ordered way'. This couplet from Thirukural shows that the importance of water has been recognised in Tamil Nadu for thousands of years. After air, if life has to survive on this planet, it is attributable to water. Without water, there is no point in having any amount of wealth. It was once remarked, the next war between nations, if at all occurs, it will be on account of water.
2. This writ petition deals with the water catchment area for the Red Hills Lake. There existed a small reservoir in Puzhal area. Five score and fifty years before, the British administration decided to expand this reservoir and constructed embankments’ and masonry weirs for storage of water. The water stored in this lake, in addition to those in Chembarambakkam and Porur lakes, is essential for supply of water to the continually expanding Metropolis of Chennai.
3. The issue before this court is whether the respondents are justified in classifying the areas as a water catchment area for Red Hills Lake and declaring it as a “no development zone” under the Master Plan for Chennai. What is a water catchment area?. According to the Sydney Water Catchment Authority,
According to Understanding your catchment – stream sense manual,
DUTY OF THE STATE AND CITIZENS TO PROTECT THE ENVIRONMENT:
4. For over several decades, the position of law has been clear and categorical. It has been consistently held that it is the duty of the Union, its Federal Units, the legislatures, Union and State executives, the unitary judiciary and the citizens to act in a manner that it protects the environment. This is not only for the present residents of the country but also to save the environment for the future generations. The actions of today affects the life styles and livelihood of those coming tomorrow. Hence, the doctrine of sustainable development has been included in this nation’s DNA. The reports of the High Courts and Supreme Courts are replete
Hanuman Laxman Aroskar v. Union of India
Indore Vikas Pradhikaran v. Pure Industrial Coke & Chemicals Ltd.
Intellectuals Forum, Tirupati Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh and Ors
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the State has the power to regulate land development to protect the environment and water sources, and the petitioner's right to property was ....
Deprivation of property rights under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act requires acquisition within three years; otherwise, lands are deemed released from reservation, affirming constitutio....
Environmental protection of water catchment areas trumps property rights; prior binding precedent upheld over erroneous per incuriam declaration.
Prior development permissions granted under repealed rules remain valid despite subsequent regulatory changes, and cannot be revoked retroactively by new laws.
Land reserved under planning laws is deemed released if not acquired within three years, as per Section 38 of the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Point of law : water bodies cannot be alienated even if they are dry and cultivation carried on dried bed of water bodies does not denude land of its character as water bodies.
Failure to acquire land within three years from publication of a development plan results in deemed release from reservation under Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Failure to acquire land within three years under the Tamil Nadu Town and Country Planning Act results in automatic lapse of reservation.
Land is deemed released from reservation if not acquired within three years as per Section 38 of the Town and Country Planning Act, 1971.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.