Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
SHAHNAWAZ @ CHHOTU Vs State - Allahabad
"].Some references mention procedural aspects or related judgments, but without specific details about the case’s main points, verdict, or insights.
Analysis and Conclusion:
Note: For a precise answer, access to the actual case judgment or detailed case files would be necessary.
In the realm of Indian jurisprudence, cases involving state authorities often highlight critical issues in criminal law, administrative procedures, and constitutional rights. One such query that frequently arises is about the case . Legal enthusiasts, researchers, and practitioners often seek detailed judgments or summaries to understand precedents. However, a thorough examination of referenced legal documents reveals a notable absence of direct information on this specific case. This blog post analyzes the available materials, integrates insights from related sources, and provides guidance on navigating such legal research challenges.
The question at hand revolves around . Users typically inquire about the facts, rulings, or key legal findings in this matter. Unfortunately, as per a detailed review, the provided legal documents do not contain any direct reference, summary, or judgment specifically addressing this case. 2009 1 Supreme 438 2004 0 Supreme(SC) 1565 2015 5 Supreme 369
This lack of mention underscores the importance of precise document sourcing in legal research. The documents span criminal appeals, convictions, land reforms, and procedural issues, but none align directly with the queried case. 2014 2 Supreme 123 1995 0 Supreme(SC) 928
A comprehensive scan of 18 key references confirms no explicit citation or discussion of . For instance:- 2009 1 Supreme 438 discusses links but remains unrelated.- 2004 0 Supreme(SC) 1565 covers transfers, offering no connection. 2015 5 Supreme 369- NDPS-related appeals in 2014 2 Supreme 123 and 2023 0 Supreme(Cal) 376 focus on convictions and drug quantities, without mention of the case.
This pattern holds across procedural judgments on juvenile age, wills, and administrative appointments. 2023 0 Supreme(All) 2530 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 411
The documents broadly address:- Criminal Law: Assault, murder appeals, and evidence recovery. 2025 0 Supreme(HP) 738 2022 0 Supreme(UK) 66- Land Reforms: Vesting and civil suits over property. 1967 0 Supreme(SC) 250 2007 0 Supreme(UK) 606- Procedural Matters: Bail, NDPS compliance under Sections 50 and 42. 2024 0 Supreme(HP) 117 1972 0 Supreme(HP) 65- Service and Administrative Issues: Elections, transport cases. 1969 0 Supreme(SC) 221 2018 0 Supreme(HP) 1547
None pertain to the Himachal Pradesh case, limiting inferences to general principles. 2010 6 Supreme 336
While direct details are unavailable, other sources provide contextual value through similar names or themes, potentially aiding broader research.
Several documents reference a 'Negi' as Deputy Advocate General:
for the State/respondents. ... for the State/appellants.
These involve patwari peons and Section 73 matters, not directly linked but illustrating state counsel roles in regional disputes.
A pertinent theme emerges in service law. In one case:
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the appointing authority must independently apply its mind to the recommendations made by the Screening Committee and form a subjective satisfaction... 2005 0 Supreme(All) 2177
The court quashed a order under , emphasizing independent review of service records. This principle, drawn from precedents like AIR SC 1622, may resonate if the queried case involves administrative actions. The petitioner was reinstated without full back-wages on a '' basis.
Another source highlights termination vitiation:
Entire enquiry proceeding against petitioner was vitiated for non-observance of ... 2021 0 Supreme(All) 1424
Involving and , it stresses witness examination in charges.
NDPS compliance is recurrent:
Finding mandated under which is a for granting bail... 2020 0 Supreme(All) 438
Bail was denied for commercial charas quantity recovery, deferring factual disputes to trial. Similar rigor appears in references.
These snippets, while not central, enrich understanding of overlapping legal terrains like state actions and procedural fairness.
The absence of case-specific data in these references implies that may reside in unindexed or separate repositories. Analyses are confined to provided materials; external judgments could alter perspectives. 2004 1 Supreme 451
Key limitations:- No facts, holdings, or ratios available here.- Recommendations stress obtaining the original judgment for accurate advice.
While evades direct coverage in these documents, the reviewed materials illuminate allied principles in criminal, service, and procedural law. This analysis serves as a starting point, but for tailored advice, consult primary sources or professionals. Legal landscapes evolve, and thorough verification remains paramount.
Disclaimer: This post offers general insights based on referenced documents and is not legal advice. Outcomes may vary by facts and jurisdiction.
#HimachalCase2016, #SinghNegiJudgment, #IndianLegalAnalysis
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned AGA for the State. ... He further says that "yah kahna sahi hai ki Shahnawaz ke viruddh maine jo bhi bayan diya hai wah suni sunayi baton ke aadhar par diya ha, mere shapath patra me bhi Shahnawaz ke viruddh jo baten ankit hai wah suni sunayi baton ... Further contention is that applicant is in jail since 29.1.2016 with no criminal history and in case he is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application of....
Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ... Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/appellants. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. ... Names of those junior Patwari Peons are S/s Santosh Singh, Girish Chandra Joshi, Uttaranchal u/s 73, shall not be varied to his Rajendra Prasad and Arjun Singh.
Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ... Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/appellants. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. ... Names of those junior Patwari Peons are S/s Santosh Singh, Girish Chandra Joshi, Uttaranchal u/s 73, shall not be varied to his Rajendra Prasad and Arjun Singh.
Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/respondents. ... Negi, Deputy Advocate General for the State/appellants. Mr. C.D. Bahuguna, Sr. Adv., assisted by Mr. ... Names of those junior Patwari Peons are S/s Santosh Singh, Girish Chandra Joshi, Uttaranchal u/s 73, shall not be varied to his Rajendra Prasad and Arjun Singh.
Singh, Deputy Collector, Ghazibad. (2) S. B. Tewari, Deputy Collector, Garh Mukteshwar. (3) Rakesh Chandra, Additional District Magistrate (Admn.), Ghaziabad. ... State of Punjab and Ors.), AIR1979 SC 1622 , 1979 Lablc1186 , (1979 )2 SCC368 , [1979 ]3 SCR518 ). ... ( 15 ) REFERENCE may also be made to the Division Bench judgment of this Court in the case of kamta Singh v. State of U. ... Shri Naresh Chandra Sharma, (Sa. Ra. Ka.) ... Va Shri Naresh Chandra Sharma (Sa....
At Gwalior) STATE OF MADHYA PRADESH Petitioner(s) VERSUS RAGHUVEER Respondent(s) (HARESH SINGH NEGI) Court Master Court Master Digitally signed by R.NATARAJAN Date: 2017.03.02 2928/2017 (Arising out of impugned final judgment and order dated 02/08/2016 in MCRC No. 6991/2016 passed by the High Court Of M.P. ... JUSTICE PINAKI CHANDRA GHOSE....
(xliii)On 29th September, 2016, Sheladia wrote to NHAI, opining that the bifurcation of the state of Andhra Pradesh into Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Whether the bifurcation of the State of Andhra Pradesh into the reorganised states of State of Andhra Pradesh and the State of Telangana would constitute a „Change in Law‟?” ... (b) Whether the Bifurcation of the State of ....
(xliii)On 29th September, 2016, Sheladia wrote to NHAI, opining that the bifurcation of the state of Andhra Pradesh into Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Whether the bifurcation of the State of Andhra Pradesh into the reorganised states of State of Andhra Pradesh and the State of Telangana would constitute a „Change in Law‟?” ... (b) Whether the Bifurcation of the State of ....
(xliii)On 29th September, 2016, Sheladia wrote to NHAI, opining that the bifurcation of the state of Andhra Pradesh into Digitally Signed By:SUNIL SINGH NEGI Whether the bifurcation of the State of Andhra Pradesh into the reorganised states of State of Andhra Pradesh and the State of Telangana would constitute a „Change in Law‟?” ... (b) Whether the Bifurcation of the State of ....
Petitioner(s) VERSUS THE STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH & ORS. ... Somesh Chandra Jha, AOR Ms. Pyoli, AOR Mr. Rahul Narang, Adv. Mr. Pravin Chandra, Adv. Mr. Sanjiv Singh, Adv. Mr. Rajesh Singh Chauhan, AOR Mr. Pravesh Thakur, Adv. ... (NEETU KHAJURIA) (VIDYA NEGI) COURT MASTER COURT MASTER ... in WC No. 22576/2016 passed by the High Court Of Judicature At Allahabad) ITEM NO.5 COURT NO.7 SECTION XI S U P R E M E C O U R T O F I N D I A RECORD OF PROCEEDI....
vs. Its Workmen, AIR 1962 SC 1348 , Roop Singh Negi vs. Punjab National Bank and others, 2009 (2) SCC 570, State of Uttar Pradesh and others vs. U.P. Co-operative Spinning Mills and others, 2001 (2) UPLBEC 1475 wherein it has been held that non-compliance of procedure would vitiate the whole enquiry. Reference may also be made to the decisions of the Apex Court in the Imperial Tabacco Company of India Ltd. Saroj Kumar Sinha, 2010 (2) SCC 772 and Division Bench judgment of this Court in Subhash Chandra Sharma vs.
Manohar Singh Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh, (2014) 13 SCC 75.
The Court observed that a humane attitude is required to be adopted by a Judge while dealing with an application for remanding a suspect or accused person to police custody or judicial custody. This case before the Supreme Court was not under the provisions of the NDPS Act. 10. Dataram Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and another (supra)
(4) State of Rajasthan thro Chief Engineer, Public Health & Engineering Department, Jodhpur & Anr. Vs. Gopal Ram Gumani Ram, (2017) 2 DNJ 823. (1) J.G. Engineers Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Union of India & Ors, (2011) 5 SCC 758 (2) Harish Chandra & Company Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, (2016) 9 SCC 478 (3) Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd. Vs. Chetak Travel Agency, (2016) 2 RajLW 1545 (Raj.)
These are two appeals, being First Appeal No. 13 of 2016, Smt. Seema Vs. Shiv Singh Negi and First Appeal No. 14 of 2016, Smt. Seema Vs. Shiv Singh Negi.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
