Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Main Points and Insights:
Criteria for Case:
Criteria for Counter-Case:
Analysis and Conclusion:
The criteria for establishing a case involve the presentation of sufficient factual or legal grounds, supported by evidence or documents, to warrant judicial consideration. The nature of injury, seniority, efficiency, or procedural compliance are relevant factors in different contexts.
References:- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["Bhola Nath Dubey VS District Magistrate, Varanasi - Allahabad"]- ["M.R.Gandhi vs The State of Tamilnadu - Madras"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["Murad Khan VS District and Sessons Judge, Adilabad - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["Chidambar R. Chanekar VS Shirish Gadkar - Bombay"]- ["Thirupathi V vs The Revenue Divisional Offic - Madras"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]- ["Nallabolu Kotamma vs The Under /Deputy secretary To Govt of India/ Bharath Sarkar Ministryof Home Affairs FF Division - Telangana"]- ["Nallabolu Kotamma vs The Under /Deputy secretary To Govt of India/ Bharath Sarkar Ministryof Home Affairs FF Division - Telangana"]- ["Sterlite Technologies Ltd. & Anr. VS Assam Power Distribution Co. Ltd. & Ors. - Gauhati"]- ["K. Sreenivasachary VS A. P. State Electricity Board, Hyderabad - Andhra Pradesh"]- ["SHIVAPPA S/O RAMAPPA SULAKODE vs THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA - Orissa"]
In civil litigation, defendants often face the question: what is the criteria for case and counter case? This common query typically refers to the requirements for filing a counterclaim—also known as a counter-case—against the plaintiff's original suit (the case). Governed by Order VIII Rule 6A of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC), a counterclaim allows defendants to assert their own claims efficiently within the same proceedings. Understanding these criteria is crucial for avoiding multiplicity of suits and ensuring speedy justice. Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
This guide breaks down the statutory prerequisites, procedural nuances, and judicial discretion involved, drawing from key legal precedents and principles. Whether you're a litigant, lawyer, or simply curious about civil procedure, here's what you need to know.
A counterclaim is a defendant's claim against the plaintiff, set up in response to the original suit. It is treated as a cross-suit or separate plaint, leading to a unified judgment on both claims. The purpose? To prevent multiple proceedings and promote judicial efficiency. As noted, the purpose of introducing Rule 6-A... is to avoid multiplicity of proceedings. Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
Unlike a set-off, which is limited to ascertained sums, a counterclaim can involve any right or claim, including damages. It survives even if the original suit is dismissed. CHHAYA RAI VS BINDA PRASAD GUPTA - 2010 0 Supreme(Chh) 33Ishita Dua VS Tarun Kumar Sharma - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 645
Order VIII Rule 6A(1) CPC lays down the core requirements:
A defendant in a suit may... set up, by way of counterclaim against the claim of the plaintiff, any right or claim in respect of a cause of action accruing to the defendant against the plaintiff either before or after the filing of the suit but before the defendant has delivered his defence or before the time limited for delivering his defence has expired, whether such counterclaim is in the nature of a claim for damages or not: Provided that such counterclaim shall not exceed the pecuniary limits of the jurisdiction of the court. Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
Key prerequisites include:- Cause of Action Accrual: Must arise before delivering the written statement (WS) or the time for it expires. It can accrue before or after suit filing, but no new cause post-WS. BHAGABAT SAHU (DEAD) L. RS. ADARI DEI VS MANMATH KUMAR SAHU - 1989 0 Supreme(Ori) 314- Pecuniary Jurisdiction: Counterclaim value must fall within the court's limits; valued separately from the suit. SANJAY BHULABHAI PATEL VS PANKAJ VINODKUMAR PATNI - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1736- Limitation Act Compliance: Applies as if filed on the counterclaim date. Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
These ensure the counterclaim is maintainable as an independent proceeding. Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
Ideally, file the counterclaim with the WS under Rule 6B. However, courts allow flexibility:
Post-WS filing requires court leave, with an outer limit till issues are framed. The court has to take into consideration the outer limit for filing the counterclaim, which is pegged till the issues are framed. Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20SUDERSHAN TIWARI VS SHEO PRASAD TIWARI TRUST - 2016 0 Supreme(MP) 1078
Once allowed, it's deemed a plaint; plaintiff must file a WS in reply. Rule 6D mandates a separate order if needed. CHHAYA RAI VS BINDA PRASAD GUPTA - 2010 0 Supreme(Chh) 33
Courts exercise discretion for belated filings, balancing defendant rights with trial efficiency. Refusal is likely if it causes prejudice or delays. Key factors from Ashok Kumar Kalra (Supreme Court):- Delay period- Limitation status- Reason for delay- Assertion of right- Similarity to suit claims- Litigation costs- Abuse of process- Prejudice to plaintiff- Availability of facts- Pre-issues stage Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214
Not mandatory with WS; restriction on accrual, not filing. Courts refuse if it prolongs trial unduly. Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
The counterclaim integrates with the suit for a single judgment, avoiding fragmented litigation. Its valuation doesn't affect suit jurisdiction. Counterclaim treated as cross-suit; distinct valuation; unified proceedings. SANJAY BHULABHAI PATEL VS PANKAJ VINODKUMAR PATNI - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1736Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
If the plaintiff seeks exclusion (Rule 6C), it must be before issues. Independence ensures it proceeds solo if suit fails. Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
Other judicial contexts highlight criteria importance. For instance, in promotion disputes, merit and suitability are primary, not seniority alone—echoing balanced criteria in counterclaims. DEEPAK RANJAN MOHANTY VS STATE ELECTION COMMISSION ORISSA - 2009 Supreme(Ori) 654 In contractor eligibility, additional qualifications were upheld if aligned with manuals, stressing procedural fairness. G. D. Builders, Rep. by G. Dandapani, Puducherry VS The Government of Puducherry, rep. by Secretary to Government & Others - 2009 Supreme(Mad) 350 Even in criminal matters, injury nature isn't sole criteria for Section 307 IPC. GOUTAM SAHOO@NATHIA SAHOO Vs STATE OF ORISSA These reinforce that criteria must be statutory and justiciable across domains.
Misuse, like forum-shopping, invites costs: When a party tries to abuse... Courts should have to deal with such a client with iron hands. Sub Continental Equities Limited, Rep. by its Power Agent, Mr. Siddharth Pruthi VS R. V. D. Ramaiah - 2016 Supreme(Mad) 3566
Always consult a lawyer, as outcomes depend on facts. Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
Disclaimer: This is general information based on precedents like Ashok Kumar Kalra, Ramesh Chand, and others. It is not legal advice. Consult a qualified advocate for case-specific guidance, as courts may vary applications. Laws and interpretations evolve. Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20
References include Mahesh Govindji Trivedi VS Bakul Maganlal Vyas - 2022 8 Supreme 214, Ashok Kumar Kalra VS Wing Cdr. Surendra Agnihotri - 2020 8 Supreme 20, Ramesh Chand Ardawatiya VS Anil Panjwani - 2003 4 Supreme 27, Ishita Dua VS Tarun Kumar Sharma - 2024 0 Supreme(All) 645, CHHAYA RAI VS BINDA PRASAD GUPTA - 2010 0 Supreme(Chh) 33, SUDERSHAN TIWARI VS SHEO PRASAD TIWARI TRUST - 2016 0 Supreme(MP) 1078, HARSUMANTHASASTRI MAHADEVASASTRI PURANIK VS MADHAVA RAO - 1989 0 Supreme(Kar) 76, BHAGABAT SAHU (DEAD) L. RS. ADARI DEI VS MANMATH KUMAR SAHU - 1989 0 Supreme(Ori) 314, SANJAY BHULABHAI PATEL VS PANKAJ VINODKUMAR PATNI - 2022 0 Supreme(Guj) 1736, and related sources.
#CounterclaimCPC, #CivilProcedureIndia, #Order8Rule6A
issue the appointment letter for the post of Assistant Line Man after *** 2 In view of the facts and circumstances of the case
He further submits that nature of injury is not the sole crieteria to say whether a prima facie case under section 307 of the IPC stands or not. He, therefore, submits that the challenges are devoid of merit. ... Case No. 74/313 of 2016. By the said order, the learned court below has rejected the petition filed by the petitioner for his discharge. ... The second ground is that the injury on the person of the injured having been found to be simple in nature, no prima facie case under section 307 of the I....
Under the circumstances a case for issuance of a writ of mandamus is made out. 4. In the result, the petition succeeds and is allowed. ... This shows that negligence on the part of the State not to take matters seriously in respect of litigation in as much as even after two years having expired when the first time was granted, but no couter-affidavit has been filed, and now there is no justification to grant any further time to learned
building or from obstructing anything viz., seats projectors etc from being brought into the theatre or fro disconnecting or dismantling amenities to the theatre until respondents appear and file couter
The specific case of the petitioner is that in the year 2020-21, after the panchayat presidents and officers were elected, grama sabha was held and works were identified and sent to the officers under the third respondent. ... On perusal of the couter filed by the respondetns 4 and 5 revealed that Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme guarantees 100 days of financial year to every household whose adult members volunteer to do unskilled manual work.
clause-3 deals with eligibility crieteria for temporary affiliation. ... In the case at hand the U.G.C. Act is not applicable but NCTE Act is applicable. ... Regulations 2009 would be applicable to the petitioner’s case and The Hon’ble Apex Court in the case
In the present case, since the petitioners did not suffer such penalty, and since it is the case of the respondents that the petitioners have not suffered of any such penalty, I find that the order of the District Judge, Adilabad appointing juniors to the selection Grade, is illegal. ... There may be people who are more efficient but that does not mean that seniors can be omitted because they are less efficient and further the couter affidavit does not give any reasons to show for what reasons the petitioners were considered as less effic....
The copy of the couter affidavit is placed with the paper-books for kind perusal of the Hon'ble Court.
The proviso to Rule 1 of Order VIII of CPC is directory and not mandatory and in an appropriate case, the Trial Court can permit the defendant to put his defence even beyond the stipulated period (see the case of Kailash Vs. Nanhku & Others, (2005) 4 SCC 480. ... Undisputely, in the said suit, the respondents have raised a couter claim inter alia for declaration that the leave and license agreement dated 22.03.2016 has expired by efflux of time.
3.The case of the Petitioner is that the above mentioned property belongs to him by virtue of sale deed, dated 15.6.2020, executed by one Ramamoorthy.The patta stood in the name of his vendor. ... 4.The second respondent/Tahsildar, Rajapalayam Taluk, Virudhunagar District has filed a couter affidavit, in which, in paragraph No.9 the Village Administrative Officer concerned sent a report stating that S.No
The duty of the counsel as an officer of the Court to see as to whether cause of action arises or not and accordingly advise the party to file the proceedings before proper forum. Place of practise of the counsel seems to be the crieteria or cause of action. Lawyers are officers of Court and they have got three responsibilities, the first one is to the party, the second to the Court and the third is to the society. This is evident from filing of O.S.No.36 of 2016 before the Sub Court, Vellore, without any jurisdiction.
(3) In case of appointment on promotion the Selection Board shall prepare lists of successful candidates which shall be equal to the number of vacancies for different posts in order of merit on the basis of merit & suitability with due regard to seniority. Rule-3. Crieteria for Promotion-Notwithstanding anything contained in the Recruitment rules: (a) All promotions to the posts or grades of different Services Civil Post; under the State Government shall be made by selection; (b) Selection for such promotion shall be made on the basis of merit & suitability in all respects ....
Assuming that the Manual of the year 2007 is applicable, even then, as I have concluded above, prescribing additional qualifications as eligibility criteria which are not found in the manual 2007 cannot be stated to be either beyond the scope of the power of the Government or the same is illegal. Thus, the Government has rightly prescribed previous experience as an additional qualification which in my considered opinion, does not require any interference. But prescribing an additional qualification as a criterian cannot be stated to be violation of the manual. It is true that previ....
The couter-foils of cheque and the bank statement are also filed by the plaintiff Heard.
The seating capacity as certified by the manufacturer is the crieteria for entering in the Certificate of Registration. Further if the vehicle is registered as 10 Seater, the tax has to be levied @ 126/- per seat per quarter and if the vehicle is used as contract carriage, the rate of tax is Rs. 1,150/- per seat within the District or if it plies within the State of Andhra Pradesh or outside the State the tax is rs. 2,500/- per seat per quarter. ( 4 ) COMMON counter has been filed by the Transport Department statingthat once the seating capacity is fixed by the manufacturer....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
