Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query..!
Scanned Judgements…!
The proceedings are also subject to compoundability under Section 48 and appeal under Section 50 of the Act, implying that penal actions can be settled or challenged through appellate mechanisms ["KANAKASHREE STONE CRUSHER PROP. G v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"], ["M/S BALAJI v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"].
Analysis and Conclusion:
References:- ["SURESH KUMAR vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["Hindustan Unilever Ltd. VS State of Telangana, Rep. through Public Prosecutor, High Court for the State of Telangana, Hyderabad - Telangana"]- ["MUTHOOT FINCORP LTD. VS STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]- ["KANAKASHREE STONE CRUSHER PROP. G v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["M/S BALAJI v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["RASHMI HITNAL v/s THE STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["M/S SAI MAHALAKSHMI STONE CRUSHER PROP K LAKSHMI PRASAD RAO v/s STATE OF KARNATAKA - Karnataka"]- ["M/S.ASHLYN CHEMUNNOOR INSTRUMENTS PRIVATE LIMITED vs STATE OF KERALA - Kerala"]
In the realm of temple administration and regulatory compliance, a pressing question arises: whether penal proceedings can be initiated against Devaswom authority for non-compliance of directions in legal metrology packaged regulations. Devaswom Boards, which manage prominent temples like those in Kerala, often face scrutiny over vendor practices at pilgrimage sites such as Sabarimala. But does this extend to direct penal liability under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009? This post delves into the legal framework, judicial precedents, and practical implications, drawing from key cases and related sources.
Note: This article provides general information based on judicial interpretations and is not legal advice. Consult a qualified lawyer for specific cases.
The Legal Metrology Act, 2009, along with the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011, regulates declarations on packaged goods, weights, measures, and penalties for violations. These laws primarily target manufacturers, packers, importers, and sellers directly involved in packaging and sale activities. Penalties under Section 18, for instance, apply to contraventions like false declarations.
However, the Act does not explicitly impose obligations on administrative bodies like Devaswom Authorities unless they engage in regulated activities. Devaswom Boards oversee temple endowments and pilgrim facilities but typically do not package commodities themselves. Their role often involves ensuring vendor compliance, as seen in court directives for Sabarimala.
For example, courts have directed the Travancore Devaswom Board's Vigilance Wing to conduct inspections at Sabarimala and Erumeli to ensure strict compliance of the directions contained in the orders of this Court SURESH KUMAR T.J. vs STATE OF KERALA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11469. Similarly, in Sabarimala pilgrim management cases, the Kerala High Court emphasized enforcement of pricing and quality standards for vendors to protect pilgrims' rights under Articles 21 and 25 SUO MOTTU vs TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY Advocate - SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER,SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD - 2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20693. Here, authorities like the District Collector and Devaswom Board facilitate compliance, but direct penal liability remains unestablished.
Penal proceedings cannot be initiated against the Devaswom Authority solely for non-compliance with directions related to legal metrology packaged regulations, especially when such directions are not backed by applicable legal provisions or when proceedings are found to be baseless or beyond jurisdiction.
Judicial precedents consistently quash proceedings lacking a solid legal foundation, procedural fairness, or jurisdiction. Key points include:
In a pivotal case, the court held that prosecution should not proceed if the printing on the package is compliant with the rules and continuation of prosecution not necessary when allegations do not establish an offence Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. VS Controller Of Legal Metrology - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1493. Proceedings were quashed as baseless, underscoring that penalties require clear violations.
Proceedings were quashed due to non-applicability of the legal provisions and violation of natural justice Hindustan Unilever Limited Represented by its Executive Director VS State of Andhra Pradesh through Public Prosecutor - 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 395. This highlights that authorities must operate within the Act's scope; overreach invites judicial intervention.
In another instance, proceedings against duty-free operators were invalidated because the authority's jurisdiction extended beyond the customs frontiers of India Flemingo Duty Free Shop Pvt. Ltd. VS Kaushik Bhattacharya - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 308. Similarly, procedural irregularities led to quashing in a case involving packaging non-compliance Indian Oil Corporation Limited VS Controller of Legal Metrology Government of Goa - 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 234.
These rulings align with broader applications. For instance, directors faced liability for using non-standard units, but only where direct involvement was proven RAJEEV MINOCHA, UNNAT SUBHASH VARMA, PRIYANKA SINHA, ANKUSH TULI, SAMIR MENON, AMAN LAL, PRAVEEN REDDY CHERUKU, RAHUL SURESH SHINDE, M/S.YUM RESTAURANTS INDIA PVT. LTD. vs STATE OF KERALA - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 5919. In contrast, mere supervisory failure does not trigger penalties.
Devaswom Authorities manage religious endowments and pilgrim welfare, not commercial packaging. At sites like Sabarimala, they ensure vendor adherence to metrology standards via inspections, as directed by courts SURESH KUMAR T.J. vs STATE OF KERALA - 2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 11469. A report noted challenges in enforcement due to inadequate personnel from Legal Metrology and police SUO MOTTU vs TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY Advocate - SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER,SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD - 2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20693.
Yet, initiating penal action against the Devaswom itself—for example, for not obliging officers under Rule 6(1)(e)—lacks precedent unless direct engagement in sales is shown Raja.V vs The Assistant Inspector of L - 2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 76733. Courts have quashed similar complaints where non-standard practices were alleged but not substantiated HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED Vs THE STATE THROUGH PUBLIC PROSECUTOR.
In temple contexts, non-compliance with court directions on vendor pricing led to directives for schemes like direct sales by Devaswom, but not personal penalties on the authority SUO MOTTU vs TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY Advocate - SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER,SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD - 2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20693. This suggests supervisory lapses may warrant administrative action, not criminal prosecution under metrology laws.
While generally protected, exceptions exist:
Related cases reinforce this. Suppliers faced prosecution for Rule 24 breaches MUKESH S/O HARI BUTANI vs STATE OF MAHA THR THE INSPECTOR LEGAL METROLOGY AMRVATI DIVISION NO 3 - 2026 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 383, but administrative bodies escaped unless directly culpable.
To navigate these issues:
Legal Metrology officials have been deputed for temple compliance SUO MOTTU vs TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, REP BY ITS SECRETARY Advocate - SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD, GOVERNMENT PLEADER,SRI KRISHNA MENON, SC, TRAVANCORE DEVASWOM BOARD - 2014 Supreme(Online)(KER) 20693, emphasizing collaborative enforcement over punitive measures against authorities.
Penal proceedings against Devaswom Authorities for legal metrology non-compliance are typically unjustified absent direct involvement and proven violations. Courts prioritize valid legal basis, jurisdiction, and natural justice, as evidenced in precedents like Hindustan Coca Cola Beverages (P) Ltd. VS Controller Of Legal Metrology - 2024 0 Supreme(Ker) 1493Hindustan Unilever Limited Represented by its Executive Director VS State of Andhra Pradesh through Public Prosecutor - 2022 0 Supreme(Telangana) 395Flemingo Duty Free Shop Pvt. Ltd. VS Kaushik Bhattacharya - 2024 0 Supreme(Cal) 308Indian Oil Corporation Limited VS Controller of Legal Metrology Government of Goa - 2014 0 Supreme(Bom) 234. In temple settings, the focus remains on protecting pilgrims through enforcement, not penalizing overseers.
Key Takeaways:- Devaswom's role is supervisory, shielding it from direct penalties.- Challenge proceedings on procedural or jurisdictional grounds.- Prioritize compliance to safeguard pilgrim rights and avoid litigation.
Stay informed on evolving regulations, especially for high-traffic sites like Sabarimala. For tailored guidance, reach out to legal experts.
#LegalMetrology #DevaswomAuthority #PenalProceedings
The proceedings are initiated alleging violations of Section 30(a) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. ... Sri.Anoop P.V., the learned counsel for the petitioner, submitted that the authority of the Inspector, Legal Metrology, is questionable since it is seen from the complaint itself that he was appointed not by the Government but by the District Collector. ... 2 THE INSPECTOR LEGAL METROLOGY DEPARTMENT, RANNI, PATHANAMTHITTA DISTRI....
The said non mentioning of the net quantity as required under law amounts to contravention of Section 18, 31(1), 30 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009 read with Rules 32 of Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Rules 2011 and Rules 4, 2(f), 6(1) (c), 6(2) and 18 of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, ... However, when it is mentioned as 500 ml, it is in compliance of the quantity as mentioned in the Rules. ... Once the concerned authority#H....
The authority alleged that the above said action of the Petitioners constitutes an offence under Section 30 of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009. ... Petitioners are seeking to quash Annexure-A1 complaint filed by the Senior Inspector, Legal Metrology, Manjeri against them before the Judicial First Class Magistrate's Court, Manjeri and consequential proceedings in S.T. No. 152/2019. 2. ... Penalty for non-production of documents, etc. - Whoever, being required by or under....
The Vigilance Wing of the Travancore Devaswom Board shall also conduct regular inspections at Sabarimala and at Erumeli in order to ensure strict compliance of the directions contained in the orders of this Court.” ... By the order dated 19.12.2023, the additional 28th respondent Deputy Controller (Flying Squad), Legal Metrology Department, Pathanamthitta and the additional 29th respondent Deputy Controller (Flying Squad), Legal Metrology Department, Kottayam were dir....
The main contention of the petitioner is that for not having obliged the officer, the officer has initiated the prosecution as if this petitioner has violated Rule 6(1)(e) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 r/w Section 18 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009. ... Commodities) Rules, 2011 r/w Section 18 of Legal Metrology Act, 2009. ... Since the petitioner has refused to pay the demanded amount, a show cause notice, under Section 18(1) of the ....
He has also submitted that the Legal Metrology Department of the State Government has also deputed sufficient number of officers for ensuring compliance of the directions issued by this Court in the aforesaid orders. 6. ... It is pointed out in the report that the directions issued by this Court as per the order in DBP No.24 of 2010 and the order in SSCR Nos.26 and 28 of 2014 are not being enforced for want of adequate number of police personnel and legal metrology of....
METROLOGY ACT, 2009, R/W THE LEGAL METROLOGY (PACKAGED COMMODITIES) RULES, 2011, AND ALL FURTHER PROCEEDINGS AND ORDERS IN THE SAID CASE (ANNEXURE- A); B. ... 5 so instituted for the offence punishable under the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (`Act’ for short) and the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011. ... QAUSHING THE COMPLAINT IN C.C.NO.10291/2021 FILED BY THE RESPONDENT BEFORE THE XXIV ACMM, BANGALORE ON 05.03.2021 AND ALL THE ....
Legal Metrology Act, 2009 (for short ‘the Act’). 2. The proceedings in the aforesaid case were initiated by the learned Magistrate on the basis of a complaint filed by the Inspector, Legal Metrology, Kodungalloor. ... Thus, it is clear from the aforesaid provisions of law that the petitioners cannot take shelter under Annexures B and C or Rule 26(b) of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, to escape from the criminal prosecution #HL_START....
under Section 36(1) of Legal Metrology Act, 2009. ... to prosecute the accused under Legal Metrology Act. ... It is further alleged that accused is the supplier/dealer of M/s Glaxo Smithkline Consumer Healthcare Ltd. had committed a breach of Section 18(1) of the Legal Metrology Act, 2009 and Rules 24 of the Legal Metrology (Packaged Commodities) Rules, 2011 and is, therefore, guilty of the offence punishable ... He further submitted that the compla....
Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Rules, 2011. ... Further, the Assistant Controllers of Legal Metrology were directed to apprise the Bullion traders to use only non - automatic weighing machines which are approved by the Government of India. ... Legal Metrology (Enforcement) Rules, 2011. ... 11. ... Legal Metrology has filed counter - affidavit on behalf of the respondents. ... Legal Metrology (En....
4. Learned advocate Mr. Rana thereafter referred further affidavit filed by the applicant and contended that though the respondents have paid an amount of Rs.52,84,387/- including the interest as directed by this Court during the pendency of these proceedings, the respondents have not given the higher grade scale to the applicant and thereby the respondents have not fully complied with the directions issued by this Court. Thus, appropriate proceedings be initiated against the respondents for non-compliance of the directions issued by this Court.
We fail to see how the High Court would have role to play in this regard. In these circumstances, we could have initiated contempt proceeding against the concerned authority of the State Government for Non-compliance of the directions contained in paragraphs 33 and 34. Ramakrishnam Raju v. Union of India & Ors] and other connected matters. However, for the present, we refrain from doing so and instead grant four weeks' time from today to the State to come up With an appropriate Scheme in accordance With the directions contained in paragraphs 33 and 34 of the judgment and or....
In the said case, a Single Judge of the Gujarat High Court gave directions to the Registry to initiate action against concerned clerk for not being diligent in performing his duties and to apprise the Court about the action initiated by the Registry. The power to initiate disciplinary proceedings against any officer or other staff member of the High Court, thus constitutionally lies within the exclusive domain of the Chief Justice under Article 229. The Single Judge initiated suo motu contempt proceedings for non-compliance with the above directions. The Division Bench cons....
Mr. Saha Roy also submitted that the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the appellant was vitiated due to non-compliance of the statutory Service Regulations since the power of the disciplinary authority was not exercised by the authority mentioned in the Service Regulation. Roy specifically submitted that the disciplinary proceedings should be initiated by the prescribed authority only and therefore the disciplinary proceedings initiated in the present case cannot be held to be proper and valid. The learned counsel of the appellant further submitted that at no poin....
But it is also clear that these steps, however, harsh they may sound, are in the nature of being procedural and would only lead to delay without any gains to the environment and the people. The Committee is cognizant of the fact that large scale development has already been undertaken and it is not possible or prudent at this stage to halt or cease its operations. One option would be to recommend the cancellation of clearances, where procedures have been bypassed. The Committee is cognizant of the fact that large scale development has already been undertaken and it is not possible or prudent....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
