Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Scanned Judgements…!
GAJIBAR MONDAL vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS - Gauhati
"] and it would be in the interest of justice if one more opportunity is granted ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"].References:- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["2012 0 Supreme(All) 2745"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["
Goenka VS Rajesh Goenka - Crimes
"]- ["1985 0 Supreme(Cal) 428"]- ["GAJIBAR MONDAL vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS - Gauhati
"]- ["2025 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 21451"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["2013 0 Supreme(Mad) 377"]- ["A.S.ABBAS KHAN vs M.D.GAJARAJ KUMAR - Madras
"]- ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 35774"]- ["2022 Supreme(Online)(Mad) 73811"]- ["2021 Supreme(Online)(MAD) 34347"]- ["SUFIA KHATOON vs THE UNION OF INDIA AND 5 ORS - Gauhati
"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]- ["N.Nithya Vs Karmegam - Madras"]
In domestic violence cases, swift protection is crucial. A common query arises: police assistant granted exparte—meaning, can courts direct police assistance to enforce ex parte (without notice) residence orders under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (DV Act)? This blog delves into the legal framework, enforcement mechanisms, and limitations, drawing from judicial precedents. While this provides general insights, consult a legal professional for advice tailored to your situation.
Under the DV Act, courts may grant ex parte residence orders and enforce them with police assistance to safeguard the aggrieved person. Sections 19(5) and 19(7) explicitly empower this. However, vacating such an order after a hearing may not trigger the same police enforcement against the aggrieved person, as the Act prioritizes protection without symmetric reliefs against her. 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 332
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
Key Points:- Ex parte residence orders under the DV Act can be enforced using police aid for the aggrieved person's benefit.- Vacation post-hearing may not automatically allow police enforcement against the aggrieved person due to the Act's protective scheme.- Magistrates hold wide powers for interim/ex parte reliefs favoring the aggrieved. 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 332
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
The DV Act equips Magistrates to pass ex parte residence orders enforceable via police. Section 19(5) states the court may order enforcement of residence orders and direct the nearest
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
This framework ensures immediate relief, reflecting the Act's intent to protect women from domestic violence without delay.
A pivotal issue emerges post-hearing: Can an order vacating an ex parte residence order be enforced against the aggrieved person using police? The Act lacks specific provisions for reliefs or enforcement against her, as it's a beneficial legislation tilted toward the aggrieved woman. No conclusive ruling mandates symmetric enforcement, suggesting limitations. 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 332
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
For instance, in scenarios where ex parte injunctions are vacated, courts emphasize the Act's welfare nature, limiting adverse actions. This protective lean means police aid typically supports the aggrieved, not vice versa.
Courts exercise caution with ex parte grants across civil procedures, applicable here. They must be extremely careful, preferring notice and limiting duration. Factors include irreparable harm, balance of convenience, good faith, and brevity. If the suit is dismissed, restitution must be recorded. 2011 4 Supreme 625 1999 5 Supreme 547 2024 3 Supreme 619 2000 3 Supreme 195
In one case, an ex parte injunction granted in favor was later vacated, highlighting fabrication risks if misused.
KANNAN vs THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE
The court noted: injunction granted in her favour was vacated by the Sd/- //True Copy// Sub Assistant ... Using the exparte injunction, the said accused persons Vijaya, were fabricated. This underscores judicial scrutiny.Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
Related cases illustrate broader contexts. For example, ex parte decrees in matrimonial matters become final if uncontested, but delays in challenges (e.g., 1923 days) lead to dismissal, especially with prior participation or false complaints.
N.Nithya Vs Karmegam
Police involvement in such probes, like false complaints, adds layers: the petitioner/wife filed a false police complaint on 05.05.2014.N.Nithya Vs Karmegam
In disciplinary matters, police personnel like Junior Assistants face charge memos from competent authorities, such as Superintendents of
Criminal cases further contextualize: Invalid sanctions by Police Commissioners for Assistant Inspectors highlight procedural rigor. 2022 0 Supreme(Bom) 542 Undisputedly the sanction to the prosecution has been accorded by Anami Roy (P.W.3), who was Commissioner of
For Aggrieved Persons: Leverage Sections 19 and 23 for prompt police-protected relief. Document circumstances thoroughly.
In motor accident or corruption cases with police, inconsistencies in evidence (e.g., bribe demands) lead to acquittals, emphasizing reliable proof. 2015 0 Supreme(Bom) 91 2015 0 Supreme(Guj) 390
The DV Act empowers police assistance for ex parte residence orders to protect the aggrieved, but vacation enforcement may face hurdles due to its pro-victim design. Courts balance urgency with fairness, urging caution in ex parte grants.
Key Takeaways:- Police aid is available for enforcing pro-aggrieved ex parte orders. 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 332
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
- Symmetric enforcement against her lacks explicit support.- Always prioritize hearings and evidence.This is general information based on precedents; laws evolve, and outcomes vary. Seek expert counsel for your case. Stay informed, stay safe.
References:1. 2018 0 Supreme(Ker) 332: Ex parte residence orders, police enforcement, limitations.2.
Ansari VS Shiji - Crimes (2018)
: Reinforces DV Act police-assisted enforcement.3. 2011 4 Supreme 625: Caution in ex parte injunctions.4. Others as cited for contextual principles. #DVAct #ExParteOrders #PoliceAssistance
the exparte order in time and therefore, she filed a petition with the delay of 1923 days which was dismissed by the Court below stating that the petitioner has participated in the divorce proceedings and only after contest, divorce has been granted to the respondent/husband and though it is stated ... , the petitioner/wife filed a false police complaint on 05.05.2014 and was living separately and the respondent sent a legal notice dated 08.05.2014 for which, the petitioner did not reply to the same and hence, the respondent filed HMOP.N....
exparte decree of 1996 has been recalled, hence no relief as prayed for in this writ petition, can be granted to the petitioner for a direction to the Senior Superintendent of Police Aligarh to address the prayer of the petitioner made in the representation since there is no order passed in proceedings ... an application was made by the State on 15.02.2007 for recall of the exparte order, which application was allowed and the exparte order dated 30.11.1996 was recalled by the Assistant....
Hence, the exparte decree has become final. ... Hence, due to lapse of period, the prayer sought for by the petitioner cannot be granted now. ... Hence, the learned District Munsif, Dharmapuri has Sd/- //True Copy// Sub Assistant
injunction granted in her favour was vacated by the Sd/- //True Copy// Sub Assistant ... Using the exparte injunction, the said accused persons Vijaya, were fabricated and hence by recording the same the exparte
was granted on 09.04.2015. ... The said exparte divorce order was also published in Dina Bhoomi paper on 23.04.2015. ... Since G.R.Saranya was continuously absent before the said Court, an exparte divorce Sd/- True Copy Sub Assistant
and passed exparte decree as prayed in the suit. ... It has granted time to the HR & CE Department for production of order sufficient opportunities granted ... Commissioner of Police, Pallavaram, Chennai-43. ... As narrated above, the said decree is exparte decree.
order was granted in favour of the plaintiffs. ... Sd/- Assistant Registrar (CS-I) /True Copy/ Sub Assistant Registrar To: p ... According to the respondent, the property was earmarked for constructing a Police Station and such a vast area cannot be allowed to be encroached upon by the petitioners. ... During pendency of the suit, the defendant/respondent herein has filed an application in I.A.No.81 of 2012, praying to set aside the exparte order passed in I.A.No.274 of 2011, in and by which, an #HL_ST....
It has been urged on behalf of the petitioner that the said exparte order of Bail granted by the learned Magistrate on 22-10-85 is on the face of it bad. ... Aruna Goenka, wife of Sri Rajesh Goenka for cancellation of the bail granted to her husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and her sister-in-law in connection with Karaya Police Station Case No. 236 dated 19-10-85. ... We direct that a plain copy of the operative part of this order countersigned by the Assistant Registrar (Court) be handed over to t....
Aruna Goenka, wife of Sri Rajesh Goenka for cancellation of the bail granted to her husband, father-in-law, mother-in-law and her sister-in-law in connection with Karaya Police Station Case No. 236 dated 19-10-85. The F. I. ... ... ( 9 ) IT has been urged on behalf of the petitioner that the said exparte order of Bail granted by the learned Magistrate on 22-10-85 is on the face of it bad. ... Although in the petition for bail, only ad-interim bail had been prayed for, the learned Magistrate on 22-10-85 by his said order....
Contending that if an opportunity is not granted to the petitioner to defend his interest the same would result to miscarriage of justice, the learned counsel has prayed for setting aside the impugned exparte order. ... A perusal of the impugned exparte order dated 27.12.2018 goes to show that notice was served in this case by substituted method through the police constable by affixing a copy of the notice in presence of ... JUDGE JUDGE Comparing Assistant ... Having regard to the facts and circumst....
Undisputedly the sanction to the prosecution has been accorded by Anami Roy (P.W.3), who was Commissioner of Police. Admittedly, the accused was serving as an Assistant Police Inspector. 8. The first point agitated is about the invalid sanction. The main grievance is about the incompetency of Police Commissioner to accord sanction for the post of Assistant Police Inspector, who is a gazetted officer.
Copy of roznama in Criminal Case No.5 of 1995 Exh.35 13. 8 4. Agreement executed by accused and complainant dated 27-5-1994 Exh.14 5. Caste certificate of complainant Exh.13 6. Copy of complaint filed by accused Exh.9 7. Copy of complaint filed by accused Exh.10 8. Roznama in Criminal Case No.5 of 1995 Exh. 28 ....
There, first informant gave report [Exh. 24] on 31/01/2001. On following day, the Assistant Police Inspector [P.W. 11] He found there one 'shirt' having blood stains over the dried stems of the plants adjoining to the common boundary of the fields of Sambhaji Pole and accused Ashok.
2. The petitioner is a Junior Assistant in the police department. The charge memo was issued by the Superintendent of Police. He was issued with a charge memo dated 20.06.2013 under Rule 17(b) of the Tamil Nadu Civil Services (Discipline and Appeal) Rules (hereinafter referred to as "the Rules").
It is stated in the complaint, at the spot the Santro Car was coming down the slope towards the right side. It has been lodged by the Assistant Police Sub-Inspector. Similarly, the Mahindra Jeep was proceeding up on the slope and the same was driven by the driver in the middle of the road.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.