Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Searching Case Laws & Precedent on Legal Query.....!
Analysing the retrieved Case Laws
Scanned Judgements…!
Racial Perception and the Look-Alike Phenomenon - It was observed in a case involving pencils that the two pencils look alike due to similar color schemes and packaging, which could cause confusion among children ["CAMLIN PRIVATE LIMITED VS NATIONAL PENCIL INDUSTRIES - Delhi"]. Similarly, in a case concerning flowers, the flowers look very similar with minor differences, but the overall similarity could lead to mistaken identity ["CAMLIN PRIVATE LIMITED VS NATIONAL PENCIL INDUSTRIES - Delhi"]. These examples illustrate how physical similarities can lead to mistaken identity, paralleling the issue in TIP (Test Identification Parade) cases where witnesses might perceive individuals as identical or similar, especially when the accused and the person seen earlier look alike.
TIP Conduct and Its Impact on Identification Evidence - Multiple sources emphasize the importance of timely and properly conducted TIP proceedings. It was noted that delays (e.g., over four months) in conducting TIP can affect the reliability of identification, and that witnesses might identify accused based on appearance seen outside the TIP ["Arvind Rajwar, son of Rambachan VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"]. Courts have also observed that while TIP is a valuable tool, its absence or delay does not always invalidate identification, but it raises concerns about the witnesses' ability to distinguish the accused ["State Of Gujarat VS Govindbhai Madhubhai Koli - Gujarat"], ["LALIT KUMAR @ SONU vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"].
The Whiteman Reference and Racial Similarity - A specific case references the observation that for all Negroes Whiteman look alike in the context of racial stereotyping ["CHARAN SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi"]. This indicates a recognition that racial features can lead to perceptions of similarity, which may influence witness identification and the perception that individuals of different races look alike, thus complicating TIP procedures involving racial minorities.
Main Point and Insight - The recurring theme across these cases is that physical and racial similarities can pose challenges to accurate identification, especially when TIP procedures are delayed or improperly conducted. The recognition that Negroes Whiteman look alike underscores racial stereotyping's role in eyewitness misidentification, highlighting the importance of careful, prompt, and unbiased TIP procedures to mitigate mistaken identity based on superficial similarities ["CHARAN SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi"].
References:["CAMLIN PRIVATE LIMITED VS NATIONAL PENCIL INDUSTRIES - Delhi"], ["CHARAN SINGH VS UNION OF INDIA - Delhi"], ["State Of Gujarat VS Govindbhai Madhubhai Koli - Gujarat"], ["Arvind Rajwar, son of Rambachan VS State of Jharkhand - Jharkhand"], ["LALIT KUMAR @ SONU vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI - Delhi"]
In the realm of criminal law, Test Identification Parades (TIP) play a crucial role in corroborating eyewitness testimony. However, a striking judicial remark in one case highlighted deep-seated racial stereotypes: for all Negroes Whiteman look alike. This phrase, rooted in discussions on human perception and identification, raises profound questions about bias in legal proceedings. But in which case pertaining to TIP was this observation made?
This blog delves into the origins of this remark, its context within Indian jurisprudence, and its broader implications for fair trials. While stereotypes like this have no place in modern law, understanding their historical mention underscores the evolution of evidentiary standards.
A Test Identification Parade is a procedural tool used during police investigations to test a witness's ability to identify suspects from a lineup. Under Section 9 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872, TIP is not substantive evidence but serves to corroborate court identification. Courts have repeatedly emphasized its importance while cautioning against biases. As noted, TIPs belong to stage of investigation by Police – It assures that investigation is proceeding in right direction – It is a rule of prudence which is required to be followed in cases where accused is not known to witness or complainant. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178
Delays in conducting TIP can vitiate its reliability, especially if witnesses see the accused beforehand. In one ruling, the court observed that a 14-day delay may not cause prejudice to the accused, but there's a high chance of accused being seen by the identifying witnesses outside the jail premises. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178
The observation that all Negroes look alike emerges in discussions on perceptual biases during identification. A key reference appears in contexts involving the Universal Negro Improvement Association, where identity and racial stereotypes were scrutinized. The phrase in all Negroes Whiteman look alike is noted in the detailed case analysis related to State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362, examining the association's objectives, legality of bequests, and implications of racial stereotypes.
This ties directly to TIP proceedings, where such stereotypes could undermine accurate identification. The court highlighted how prejudiced views affect treatment of victims and accused, particularly in cases involving racial minorities. As elaborated, The phrase in all Negroes Whiteman look alike is found in the detailed case analysis related to trafficking, specifically in a case involving the Universal Negro Improvement Association and the legal considerations of the beneficiary's identity and purposes. State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362
Further echoing this, multiple judgments quote: For a white person, all negroes are like each other, and conversely. A person can much better distinguish those of his own age and condition than those of different ages and condition. Uniform is a cause of fallacious resemblance, above all for those who do not wear it. Lokai Chamar VS State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 1966SUSHIL ARORA VS STATE - 2017 Supreme(Del) 464IQBAL VS STATE OF UTTAR PRADESH - 2015 4 Supreme 519Hari Nath: Chhabi Nath: Raj Nath VS State Of U. P. - 1987 Supreme(SC) 834
These quotes illustrate how racial or uniform similarities lead to fallacious resemblance, impacting TIP reliability.
In State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362, the court discussed how such stereotypes influence law enforcement and judicial processes. While not establishing a legal principle, it reflects historical prejudices that could lead to misidentification in TIP cases. The observation underscores the need for objective procedures like fingerprinting or photo identification to counter biases.
Related cases reinforce this. For instance, in a dacoity matter, the court acquitted appellants because Witnesses had opportunity of seeing accused before conduct of TIP – TIP was a mere formality and no value could be attached to it. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178 The prosecution failed to prove fair conduct, highlighting TIP's fragility.
Another ruling clarified that accused cannot refuse TIP under Article 20(3), as it involves no positive volitional evidentiary act. Accused may be said to be compelled to attend a test identification parade, but this compulsion does not involve any positive volitional evidentiary act. Mukesh Singh VS State (NCT of Delhi) - 2023 6 Supreme 329 Yet, if shown to witnesses prior, TIP evidence becomes inadmissible. LALIT KUMAR @ SONU vs STATE OF NCT OF DELHI
TIP corroborates but does not substitute court identification. Evidence of mere identification of accused person at trial for first time is from its very nature inherently of a weak character – Purpose of a prior test identification is to test and strengthen trustworthiness of that evidence. Mukesh Singh VS State (NCT of Delhi) - 2023 6 Supreme 329
Courts mandate:- Holding TIP without avoidable and unreasonable delay post-arrest. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178- Maintaining a healthy ratio of suspects to non-suspects.- Prosecution proving fairness; burden not on defense. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178
The remark in State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362 and echoed elsewhere warns against racial biases. In dacoity cases, delayed TIPs (e.g., 42 days or four months) cast doubt: This delay in holding the identification parade throws a doubt on the genuineness thereof apart from the fact that it is difficult that after lapse of such a long time the witnesses would be remembering the facial expression of the appellant. Hari Nath: Chhabi Nath: Raj Nath VS State Of U. P. - 1987 Supreme(SC) 834
Modern practice condemns stereotypes, promoting training for officers. References like State of Punjab VS Davinder Singh - 2024 0 Supreme(SC) 615 provide context on racial perceptions in legal frameworks.
Other sources link to constitutional equality. Article 14 applies to laws, not administrative orders directly, but unfair discretion violates it. Dhanraj Mills Ltd VS B. K. Kocher and Anr. - 1951 Supreme(Bom) 33 In identification, Article 20(3) protects against self-incrimination but not compelled attendance at TIP. Mukesh Singh VS State (NCT of Delhi) - 2023 6 Supreme 329
In riot cases, vitiated TIP led to acquittal: As only evidence for convicting appellants is evidence of eyewitnesses in TIP and when TIP is vitiated, conviction cannot be upheld. Gireesan Nair VS State of Kerala - 2022 8 Supreme 178
For dacoity under IPC Section 396, participation of five or more must be proven beyond suspicious TIP. Lokai Chamar VS State of U. P. - 2019 Supreme(All) 1966
This analysis shows how a seemingly archaic remark reveals enduring challenges in evidence law. While specific to cases like State Of Kerala VS N. M. Thomas - 1975 0 Supreme(SC) 362, it informs ongoing reforms.
Disclaimer: This post provides general information on legal concepts and is not a substitute for professional legal advice. Consult a qualified attorney for case-specific guidance.
Chief Justice Taft observed in the leading case of Trumax v. ... Now let us look at the case of the present applicants. They say they are likely to be denied admission. On what ground? They would say that it is because they belong to the Brahmin caste. But is that all? ... The Court observed: ... "The basic consideration is.....as to what opportunity Missouri itself furnishes to white students and denies to Negroes solely upon the ground of colour. ... In the recent case#HL_E....
the dates of the TIP, which facilitated the investigation officer to acclimatise the witnesses to the way the Accused look. ... While holding that a 14day delay by itself in conducting the TIP may not cause prejudice to the accused, it observed that there is a high chance of accused being seen by the identifying witnesses outside the jail premises. In Subash and Shiv Shankar vs. State of U.P. ... Mathur’s submission was on the manner in which the TIP was conducted. According to her, the TIP#HL....
... In considering this question it is necessary to look at the constitution of appellant 1. This was a body incorporated in the State of New York on 17th June 1918. ... . - ... In this case the learned Chief Justice of British Honduras who tried it had a difficult task, arising out of somewhat obscure materials. But their Lordships think that his judgment ought not to stand. ... ... It is to be observed, further, that at the trial of the action no evidence of New York law was tendered to prove what in a British Court was only an allega....
When we look at that case we find that what was challenged in that case was not any administrative or executive order, but an ordinance passed by the City of San Francisco which required all persons desiring to establish laundries in frame houses to obtain the consent of certain municipal officials, ... That was a case where a coloured person went in appeal to the Supreme Court against his conviction for murder alleging that negroes were discriminated against in the selection of grand petit jurors, ....
There are five petals in National Flora flowers and four petals in the Camlin Flora flowers otherwise these flowers look very similar. The colour is also similar and there is green band at the end of the pencil. In short the two pencils look alike. ... In short, the two pencils look alike. These pencils are mostly purchased by small children. If a child is to buy a pencil of the plaintiff, he is bound to be confused by the two pencils. He would go by the colour combination rather than the mark written o....
At page 630 of Whiteman and Wheatcroft on Income-tax, it is observed as under: "An interesting question that often arises in practice is whether an interest-free loan or a loan at a rate below the market ... He also referred to a passage at page 630 in Whiteman and Wheatcroft on Income-tax. He also relied upon the decision in the case of Addl. CIT v. Late A.K. Lakshmi (supra). ... At page 375, it is observed as under: "...But the question would still arise whether granting amounts of the company for th....
PW-10 Sourabh Kumar Gautam, is Judicial Officer and he had conducted TIP of the suspected accused persons on 17.11.2016 in connection with GR Case No. 3657 of 2016 in B.M.C., Jail Premises, Hotwar, Ranchi. ... It is to be noted that TIP was conducted on 17.11.2016 while the date of occurrence is allegedly 28.06.2016, so, there is a gap of about more than four months in which TIP had been conducted. Here, it is pertinent to note that appellant Arun Kumar Singh was not put on TIP. ... TIP#HL_END....
In this case the Supreme Court has exhaustively examined the entire case law on the subject. It was observed:- “254. Even a TIP before a Magistrate is otherwise hit by Section 162 of the Code. ... However, in the present case the appellant refused to take part in the TIP. ... It was observed where an accused declines to participate in the TIP, the prosecution has no option but to proceed with dock identification. ... It is a safe rule ....
As was observed in Collector of Customs v. ... According to the learned counsel, the TIP is a part of the police investigation and the accused cannot be compelled to submit himself to the TIP, more particularly if the case of the accused is that he was already shown to the witness before the TIP could be undertaken. ... In the case on hand, we are not concerned with the right of privacy of an accused when it comes to putting him to TIP. What has been ruled in K.S. .......
The amendment went further and placed upon the states an obligation to provide to Negroes and whites alike that legal protection which government owes to all men. "fourteenth Amendment" edited by Bernard Schwartz, (pages 221 and 222 ). ... to the benefit of Article 16 (4), have an obvious application to our case. ... Constitution, according to Chief Justice Warren, it did more than simply require the states to refrain from affirmative action which discriminated against Negroes. ... ... ( 17 ) BUT Article 16 (2) docs not....
For a white person, all negroes are like each other, and conversely. A person can much better distinguish those of his own age and condition than those of different ages and condition. Uniform is a cause of fallacious resemblance, above all for those who do not wear it.
Uniform is a cause of fallacious resemblance, above all for those who do not wear it.” 19. For a white person, all negroes are like each other and conversely. A person can much better distinguish those of his own age and condition than those of different ages and condition.
For a white person, all negroes are like each other, and conversely. A person can much better distinguish those of his own age and condition than those of different ages and condition. Uniform is a cause of fallacious resemblance, above all for those who do not wear it.
But this ignores that unlike the United States our Constitution itself provides for reservation for backward classes, therefore, it is unnecessary to derive inspiration from decisions given by American court on equal protection. B. Venkataramana v. The State of Madras & Ors. (AIR 1951 SC 229) (3) 633. Before proceeding further it may be mentioned that many decisions were cited of American Courts dealing with affirmative action for Negroes and a parallel was attempted to be drawn from it for justifying reservation for other backward classes.
The act of recognition is very open to suggestion in all its forms .......... Resemblance is a matter or relativity. For a white person, all negroes are like each other, and conversely. A person can much better distinguish those of his own age and condition than those of different ages and condition. Uniform is a cause of fallacious resemblance, above all for those who do not wear it.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
