AI Overview...
- Basudeb Debnath Case - Main Points and Insights:
- The case involves the regularization of casual or temporary workers, with references to judgments such as Uma Devi (supra) and decisions by the Supreme Court and High Courts State of Rajasthan VS Krishna Kumar Saini - Rajasthan, Om Prakash VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Tara Pargi W/o Shri Pawan Kumar Pargi VS State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan, Dhula Ram S/o Puniya VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Durgalal Verma S/o Shri Chottulal VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Rukhamo Devi W/o. Shri Mula Ram VS State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan.
- The courts emphasized that regularization is not a one-time measure but a process that depends on fulfilling specific criteria, including service duration and compliance with established legal principles Tara Pargi W/o Shri Pawan Kumar Pargi VS State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan, Dhula Ram S/o Puniya VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Durgalal Verma S/o Shri Chottulal VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Rukhamo Devi W/o. Shri Mula Ram VS State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan.
- In the Debnath case, the Tripura High Court, referring to Uma Devi and other judgments, underscored the necessity of following proper procedures and criteria for regularization, often involving forming committees or considering eligibility based on service records State of Rajasthan VS Krishna Kumar Saini - Rajasthan.
- Several judgments highlight that casual or temporary workers, such as those working since 1996 or 1997, are subject to criteria laid down in Supreme Court cases like Uma Devi, and their regularization depends on meeting these standards Om Prakash VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Dhula Ram S/o Puniya VS State of Rajasthan - Rajasthan, Durgalal Verma S/o Shri Chottulal VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.
-
Courts have also directed authorities to reconsider cases where orders were challenged, emphasizing fairness and adherence to legal principles 01700064891.
-
Analysis and Conclusion:
- The Debnath case exemplifies the judicial stance that regularization of casual or contractual employees is governed by principles established in Supreme Court judgments, notably Uma Devi (supra).
- Regularization is a process that involves fulfilling criteria such as service length, proper procedural compliance, and eligibility, rather than an automatic or one-time act.
- Courts have consistently directed authorities to establish committees or review cases thoroughly, ensuring fair treatment of employees and adherence to legal standards Tara Pargi W/o Shri Pawan Kumar Pargi VS State Of Rajasthan, Through The Secretary Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan, Rukhamo Devi W/o. Shri Mula Ram VS State of Rajasthan, Through the Secretary, Social Welfare Department - Rajasthan.
- Overall, the case reinforces the principle that regularization is a structured process grounded in legal precedents, emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and criteria compliance for casual workers seeking permanent status State of Rajasthan VS Krishna Kumar Saini - Rajasthan, Om Prakash VS State Of Rajasthan - Rajasthan.
References: - Supreme Court of India judgments: Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Kumar Saini, Jai Narain Vyas University, and Uma Devi (supra). - High Court decisions from Tripura, Rajasthan, and Bombay emphasizing the application of these principles to specific cases involving casual or contractual employees.
Search Results for "Basudeb Debnath Case"
2021 0 Supreme(Raj) 2048 • India - Rajasthan
AKIL KURESHI, REKHA BORANA
Fact of the Case: The respondent was employed as a daily wage worker, terminated, and reinstated following a Labour ... The decision in the case of Uma Devi (supra) was noticed in the said decision. 8. In case of Basudeb Debnath (supra), Division Bench of Tripura High Court referring to decision in case of Uma Devi (supra), in the case of State of Karnataka and Ors. Vs. M.L. Kesari and Ors. ... Counsel for the petitioner relied on a Division Bench judgment of this C....
2022 0 Supreme(Raj) 1173 • India - Rajasthan
REKHA BORANA
Regularization - Services - [Uma Devi's case, Gopal Singh's case, Narendra Kumar Tiwari's case, Basudeb Debnath's case, Krishan ... Kumar Saini's case, Jai Narain Vyas University's case] - The court discussed the principles laid down in Uma Devi's case and its ... Fact of the Case: The petitioner had been working with the respondent-Department as Langari (Cook) on a wholly temporary ... In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon....
2024 0 Supreme(Raj) 884 • India - Rajasthan
FARJAND ALI
Fact of the Case: The petitioner, initially appointed as Cook-cum-Chowkidar, faced retrenchment ... In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Basudeb Debnath, Krishan Kumar Saini and Jai Narain Vyas University, it can be safely concluded that the process of regularization as held in Uma Devi’s case in not a one time measure ... [(2018) 8 SCC 238]; Shri Basudeb Debnath and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. decided on 09.03.2021; ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5688 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, J
Group ‘D’ employee after serving as casual labor since 1996; claim dismissed as he did not meet criteria established in Uma Devi case ... (Paras 5, 6) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicant worked as casual labor since 1996 and ... eligibility for regularization based on service duration and compliance with the criteria set by the Supreme Court in Uma Devi's case ... In the matter of Basudeb Debnath (supra), the Hon’ble High Court directed the respondents to form a committee to consider the #H....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5687 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr JUSTICE RAMESHWAR VYAS, J
Labour - Applicants sought regularization of services as Group 'D' employees citing circular and Supreme Court judgment in Uma Devi case ... (Paras 5, 6) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicants, engaged as casual labour since 1997 ... criteria for regularization of long-serving casual employees - Applicants failed to fulfill conditions set forth in Uma Devi's case ... In the matter of Basudeb Debnath (supra), the Hon’ble High Court directed the respondents to form a committee to consider the #....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 356 • India - Rajasthan
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Basudeb Debnath, Krishan Kumar Saini and Jai Narain Vyas University, it can be safely concluded that the process of regularization as held in Uma Devi’s case in not a one time measure ... State of Jharkhand and Others, (2018) 8 SCC 238, Shri Basudeb Debnath and Others vs. Union of India and Others, decided on 09.03.2021, Jai Narain Vyas University and Another vs. Mukesh Sharma, D.B. SAW No. 347/2019 and State....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 363 • India - Rajasthan
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Basudeb Debnath, Krishan Kumar Saini and Jai Narain Vyas University, it can be safely concluded that the process of regularization as held in Uma Devi’s case in not a one time measure ... [(2018) 8 SCC 238]; Shri Basudeb Debnath and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. decided on 09.03.2021; Jai Narain Vyas University and Anr. vs. Mukesh Sharma (D.B. SAW No.347/2019) and State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Krishan ....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 374 • India - Rajasthan
USHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Basudeb Debnath, Krishan Kumar Saini and Jai Narain Vyas University, it can be safely concluded that the process of regularization as held in Uma Devi’s case in not a one time measure ... [(2018) 8 SCC 238]; Shri Basudeb Debnath and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. decided on 09.03.2021; Jai Narain Vyas University and Anr. vs. Mukesh Sharma (D.B. SAW No.347/2019) and State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Krishan ....
2025 Supreme(Online)(CAT) 5156 • India - Central Administrative Tribunal
Mr.Umesh Gajankush, Mr.Santosh Mehra, JJ
service on a contractual basis as Ward Boy/Nursing Orderly - The court emphasized the need for reconsideration of the applicant's case ... (Paras 7, 13) ... ... Facts of the case: ... The applicant has been working since 09.08.2000 on ... ... ... Findings of Court: ... The court quashed the impugned orders and directed the respondents to reconsider the applicant's case ... Abhang and Another, 2024 SCC OnLine Bom 1268; (v) Basudeb Debnath and Others vs. ... Since in the present case#HL_EN....
2023 0 Supreme(Raj) 265 • India - Rajasthan
PUSHPENDRA SINGH BHATI
In view of the ratio as laid down by the Hon’ble Apex Court in cases of Narendra Kumar Tiwari, Basudeb Debnath, Krishan Kumar Saini and Jai Narain Vyas University, it can be safely concluded that the process of regularization as held in Uma Devi’s case in not a one time measure ... [(2018) 8 SCC 238]; Shri Basudeb Debnath and Ors. vs. The Union of India and Ors. decided on 09.03.2021; Jai Narain Vyas University and Anr. vs. Mukesh Sharma (D.B. SAW No.347/2019) and State of Rajasthan & Ors. vs. Krishan ....
Filter by Legal Phrase
